Does gods infinite love also include stage blue values?

[Nahm]

@Llight It’s seems that you are mistaking your thoughts about what people think for what people think. Might be worth inspecting, and trying listening out, imo. 

[Llight]

@Nahm Yeah yeah, it isn't working pal. If you don't want to see the obvious keep it for yourself.

[Nahm]

2 minutes ago, Llight said:

pal

?? Classic. Much love man. I hope you work it out. 

[Llight]

@Nahm Again trying to make this about me so that you don't have the thing that is really troubling you, which is this topic, trying anything to find some dirt or that i can fall for some trap so that you can feel better. Truth is, there is nothing wrong with messing up despite what you might feel, it's not too late to get back,

[Nahm]

@Llight There’s no way for you to see none of that is actually going on, while you’re believing so strongly that it is. No dirt, no traps. I love you. 

[Llight]

@Nahm You have a very contradictory way of showing it, but let's test it then more directly. Would you agree that in the god perspective materialistic world view(aka normie worldview) is the same as leos highest teaching or yours that you currently use? If yes tell me if not why? If you can't deny it or accept it then you will try talking about anything else.

[calibrate]

This topic is really sticking in my head lol

It seems the users on this site are part of some subtle religion where they derive their self worth from what color they are on spiral dynamics. Is that kind of what youre saying?

[Llight]

@calibrate That appears to be the case, they depend on that to be god, unlike the real deal.

[Nahm]

12 minutes ago, Llight said:

@Nahm You have a very contradictory way of showing it, but let's test it then more directly. Would you agree that in the god perspective materialistic world view(aka normie worldview) is the same as leos highest teaching or yours that you currently use? If yes tell me if not why? If you can't deny it or accept it then you will try talking about anything else.

What is “my teaching”? 

[Llight]

@Nahm Bruh, as i told the other guy, do your thing i am not here to convince you anything. Hey it's your life, bye bye.

[Nahm]

@Llight ♥️??

 

[Llight]

@Nahm hahah

[calibrate]

22 minutes ago, Llight said:

@calibrate That appears to be the case, they depend on that to be god, unlike the real deal.

Im with you, but what do you propose the real deal is?

[Llight]

@calibrate You would have to ask that to someone who knows and is willing to answer.

[calibrate]

Interesting...

[steenadrianmr]

Props for people keeping their cool here. OP seems very troll-ish and evasive. That or I am missing the higher picture/point here.

It seems as if OP is asking questions, but evading the ones asked by the ones replying to get more understanding for the main question.

Again, I might be missing the bigger picture.

Edited February 12, 2020 by steenadrianmr

[Forestluv]

1 hour ago, Johnny5 said:

OP is absolutely right

?

If we create a construct in which the construct is "right", then of course that construct is "right".

We could create a construct that space kangaroos value Scooby Snacks more than candy bars. If we add in righteousness to the construct, of course it is "right". That's what we just created. . . At this point, we could remain contracted within the righteousness of the construct we created. Or, we could promote it's righteousness to others. Or, we could argue with others about it's righteousness. . . Or we could expand toward "Hmmm, maybe there is another way of looking at this. . . ". 

[steenadrianmr]

1 hour ago, Johnny5 said:

OP is asking a very straightforward question with a very straightforward answer, and everyone else is evading it by asking him counter questions.

I can agree to some extent on that one after reading the thread a couple times more, however I also feel that the questions OP asked are already answered.

[Leo Gura]

Enough foolishness.

@Llight Tread carefully in the future. You're verging into ban territory.