Rupert Spira on time and space

[andyjohnsonman]

 

This video absolutely baffles me! I was following along with it conceptually until at the end of the video when the guest asks about death at 16 mins.  Birth and death dont take place at 2 different times they take place at the same moment - now. Thought cant go to the now so everything that has ever happened is now? If we have a memory of something we are remembering it now? But what about change there must be a passage of time as i look older. I understand that the past is an idea because i have never experienced it but theres definitely a transition going on as things are changing. How can things change in the now?  Is this just semantics? Just because i cant experience the past now doesn't necessarily prove it doesn't exist. If birth and death happen now then why am i alive from the relative perspective? I know people will say this is a duality hence my wording. Ruperts model of all meetings stay in the same space. 

Edited January 30, 2020 by andyjohnsonman

[Leo Gura]

Infinity cannot be explained. Period.

The mistake is trying to explain it. All explanations are finite, relative, and incomplete.

It's all pure imagination.

[Javfly33]

50 minutes ago, andyjohnsonman said:

 

This video absolutely baffles me! I was following along with it conceptually until at the end of the video when the guest asks about death at 16 mins.  Birth and death dont take place at 2 different times they take place at the same moment - now. Thought cant go to the now so everything that has ever happened is now? If we have a memory of something we are remembering it now? But what about change there must be a passage of time as i look older. I understand that the past is an idea because i have never experienced it but theres definitely a transition going on as things are changing. How can things change in the now?  Is this just semantics? Just because i cant experience the past now doesn't necessarily prove it doesn't exist. If birth and death happen now then why am i alive from the relative perspective? I know people will say this is a duality hence my wording. Ruperts model of all meetings stay in the same space. 

Who is this I that says it´s alive? Are you really this I?

Or is this "I" something that appears in form of thought and it just appears to be an "I" ?