CQ - Contextual Intelligence? Let's find a term for Guru-contextual-knowledge.

[skywords]

@MAYA EL

For me, the important thing is, or was, "does Leo understand me?"  

I don't think he does.  On the other hand, he might understand me, but is pretending not to, because his plate is already too full, and he can't afford to.  I can totally understand that.  I always have too many ppl wanting too much of my attention, too.

I'm pretty sure that I understood Leo from the very start.  Immediately.  That's why I love the guy:  He's exquisitely eloquent and easy, at least for me, to understand.

So, if I can understand all of this, why shouldn't others?

And yet, if he can't understand me, how come?

So, why not post?

What's there to lose?

You seem to fear apocalypse, the post that breaks the universe's back.  I don't.

[Amandine]

3 hours ago, skywords said:

Also, "he will not" what??  What are you referring to?

@skywords  I understood it to mean "Leo will not burn out"

That was about the only bit I understood in the whole thread. 

 

 

 

 

Edited December 14, 2019 by Amandine

[skywords]

@Amandine

Thanks!

 

[skywords]

@Angelite

I don't know what you're referring to.

[Nahm]

@Maximo Casas 

Each one is The One. There are no separate selves. The guru has no use for the model because there’s no guru believing the guru is a guru. It’s entirely a projection on the part of the seeker. Which, there isn’t. “The seeker” too, is The One. 

@skywords I like the word ‘communion’ for that. The One is absolutely non communal.

[MAYA EL]

On 12/14/2019 at 1:16 PM, skywords said:

@MAYA EL

For me, the important thing is, or was, "does Leo understand me?"  

I don't think he does.  On the other hand, he might understand me, but is pretending not to, because his plate is already too full, and he can't afford to.  I can totally understand that.  I always have too many ppl wanting too much of my attention, too.

I'm pretty sure that I understood Leo from the very start.  Immediately.  That's why I love the guy:  He's exquisitely eloquent and easy, at least for me, to understand.

So, if I can understand all of this, why shouldn't others?

And yet, if he can't understand me, how come?

So, why not post?

What's there to lose?

You seem to fear apocalypse, the post that breaks the universe's back.  I don't.

I'm not sure why you say I fear apocalypse? 

[Angelite]

15 hours ago, skywords said:

@Angelite

I don't know what you're referring to.

...

It is referring to what comes to mind as I read it. What comes to my mind may not have anything to do with what was written. Don't mind me. 

[Amandine]

On 16/12/2019 at 8:08 AM, Angelite said:

...

It is referring to what comes to mind as I read it. What comes to my mind may not have anything to do with what was written. Don't mind me. 

@skywords If it's clearer for you, can you maybe explain this answer to me? It kinda sounds very cryptic.

Edited December 17, 2019 by Amandine

[Maximo Casas]

 

On 14.12.2019 at 8:16 PM, skywords said:

@MAYA EL

For me, the important thing is, or was, "does Leo understand me?"  

I don't think he does.  On the other hand, he might understand me, but is pretending not to, because his plate is already too full, and he can't afford to.  I can totally understand that.  I always have too many ppl wanting too much of my attention, too.

I'm pretty sure that I understood Leo from the very start.  Immediately.  That's why I love the guy:  He's exquisitely eloquent and easy, at least for me, to understand.

So, if I can understand all of this, why shouldn't others?

And yet, if he can't understand me, how come?

So, why not post?

What's there to lose?

You seem to fear apocalypse, the post that breaks the universe's back.  I don't.

I think he does, he understood what you said to him. That the "evil" Stalin is also just a demonizing thing but maybe/probably (I don't know shit what the fuck is going on in his head) HE KNOWS that Stalin and Trump are a necessity to see a "complete" universe.

The only issue I see here is that you are proposing one paradigm to be "the best", the one which fits in most.

I think as @Leo Gura stated in Understanding how Paradigms work that paradigms have to be dropped, have you seen this video? If yes, drop yours too!

Dropping everything is a "narrative" I see on the Channel Actualized.org .

The Real Issue: It feels like you want to start a cult out of this idea, because you believe in the paradigm you "found" or "created", but it's just a paradigm and not "truth". I don't know yet what truth is, but probably not this paradigm you proposed, even though it includes a lot of what Leo invites you to experience.

[Maximo Casas]

On 14.12.2019 at 1:49 PM, Leo Gura said:

Yes, of course. Even Trump and Stalin are very intelligent things. Their ego just gets in the way of access to God's infinite intelligence. But never totally. Even the most evil humans still use God's intelligence to do their evil. In fact, evil is highly intelligent. But nowhere near as intelligent as Goodness and Love.

Does Goodness and Love include Evil and Hatred somehow? Aren't all good things part of bad things as non-duality defines it as Alan Watts poetically states? If the universe is infinite (I know I will try my psychedelics sooner or later ) there must be as infinite intelligent evil as infinite intelligent goodness and love or is the infinity = Goodness and love? Confused.  

[Maximo Casas]

On 16.12.2019 at 0:31 AM, Nahm said:

@Maximo Casas 

Each one is The One. There are no separate selves. The guru has no use for the model because there’s no guru believing the guru is a guru. It’s entirely a projection on the part of the seeker. Which, there isn’t. “The seeker” too, is The One. 

@skywords I like the word ‘communion’ for that. The One is absolutely non communal.

Yes, sounds "logical" (xD). This shows that some part of me is kind of a seeker still. Love it, this concept just disintegrated by your post.

[Angelite]

@skywords it does, but I have forgotten how it relates back to the post. So don't mind me. I wouldn't be able to remember my thought process back anyway~

[Nahm]

@Maximo Casas

That’s the best thing anyone can be.

Put all your attention into perception; seeing, hearing, feeling the body. Feel the breath, the air on your skin. Let your eyes relax taking in sight as a whole. Listen in to the sound bed of silence underlying all of sound, feel into the sound bed, feel into the hearing, and feel into the seeing. Attuned in perception, there’s little thinking, and everything makes sense. 

 

[skywords]

@MAYA EL

Oh, I was just playing with these words you used:

"that Leo has made and I fear that any more information and there heads may start to pop,"

You know, as if there were some catastrophe imminent, somehow.

Right?

 

[skywords]

@Amandine

No, I can't.  It sounds way too cryptic to me, as well.

[skywords]

@Nahm

Yeah, in a perpetual and infinitely varying flow..