Propertarianism

[RichardY]

Was wondering what people think of Propertarianism? As far as I can tell, it's a reworking of Confucian Legalism.

Basically the premise is that because immigrants to the United States overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with ethnic minority groups and females. The right-wing no longer have a chance of winning future elections, Trump being a last ditched anomaly, by successfully winning "the rust belt".  In effect the situation has become polarised. 

As most of the democratic voters are concentrated in Cities. In the event of a Civil War, predominantly Democrat cities could be cut off and starved to death, hence reducing the voter base. Where as Republicans in the countryside with higher gun ownership and agricultural goods, could remain well supplied. Conversely if the Democrats centralise totalitarian power in Washington DC, by running up the clock in demographics. They could massacre the Right-wing.

The idea is that a peaceful solution would be preferred. But, as they reckon the psychology of voters is too ingrained, it will result in mass violence as it has throughout history. The last 70 odd years being a bit of a bubble for peace in the west, if not east.

Sort of a repeat of the Spanish Civil War, but with a death count in the tens of millions.

I'd prefer rule by "Judges", as unnatural selection, ruling by moral authority and force, stripping out the legislative that contributes to a lot of the conflict. Or, that really some of the states should secede from the Union.
 

 

[Leo Gura]

This is so stupid.

[silene]

This reminds me of Enoch Powell and his infamous 1968 'Rivers of blood' speech ... what's that saying, the more things change the more they stay the same. 

[RichardY]

Demographically and Ethnically, it is what it is. Libertarianism, is rightfully discredited, what comes next should be interesting either way.