Prohibition of drugs. Criminals love to see it. Why do we make their day?

[Gnostic Christian]

Prohibition of drugs. Criminals love to see it. Why do we make their day?

 

You will know why criminals love to see us prohibit the various social drugs that we and our children consume.

 

Why did you vote to make their day?

 

Why are we fighting a drug war against our own children when our intelligentsia pushes for drug legalization so that we can then control in a better way what we and our children consume?

 

Our children are the ones dying due to our drug war, --- while we adults hide behind legislation that criminals love to see?

 

Regards

DL

[Mason Riggle]

Prohibition is not only profitable for the criminals on the streets who sell drugs, but also for the criminals in suits who enforce the prohibition. 

Just follow the money.  

 

[Gnostic Christian]

5 minutes ago, Mason Riggle said:

Prohibition is not only profitable for the criminals on the streets who sell drugs, but also for the criminals in suits who enforce the prohibition. 

Just follow the money.  

 

I have in official records and it leads to corrupt politicians and other white collar criminals.

W T hell. It is only our kids that we do not seem to care about.

Regards

DL

[Egzoset]

Salutations,

 

The root of bigot prohibitionism which i know & understand best (about cannabis) actually goes back to the Victorian age (1895) when a doctor of the British Empire got appointed in Cairo/Egypt to reform its El Abbasiya asylum.  His name was  John Warnock and he eventually posed as a "specialist"/"expert" though it appears he actually required assistance from a translator simply to communicate with his patients for 28 years...  That so-called "expertise" on « Insanity from Hasheesh » later inspired equally mis-guided 3rd-party publications as that from Emily F. Murphy (aka Janey Canuck), who's Macleans 1922 articles were finally printed as a book titled "The Black Candle" that is said to have joined the "reference" section of the League of Nations library just a couple years before "Indian Hemp"/"Cannabis sativa L." was added without much explanations to the 1925 Geneva Opium Convention, effectively removing moral accountability by allowing politians to displace due debates outside each country's own democratic space.  Since then our laws were gradually "harmonized" in an effort to implement the "Drug-Free World" utopia so dear to self-serving politicians as William Lyon Mackenzie King (e.g. between 2 devastating wars while eugenism + racism proved being rampant "elite" values"), ultimately followed by Nixon who gave it his own kick start, In The Name Of Children.  Nonetheless lets also mention that USA was initially expected to lead such prohibition effort much sooner though internal political tensions over sovereinty delayed its support to an international "War-on-Drugs".  Hence that's why USA citizens generally refer to the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act as a prelude only...

 

At 1st biased politically convenient juxtapositions with heroin and opium were made, arguing that drugs including cannabis could be used for sexual slavery of vulnerable women and children in days when vast portions of voters couldn't even read, much less acquire informed opinions of their own on the subject.  It was consecutive to abuse by dentists and apothecaries who lost previous "marihuana" control at the hands of doctors and pharmacists (as soon as 1890 in the Québec province).  Etc.

 

Briefly put it's a whole mess of which the "scientific" foundations wouldn't stand trial in a court of justice today.  On top of it, another socio-toxic event dating back to 1880 - 1881 occured when James Albert Bonsack patented a machine rendering the cigarette consumption method commercially viable, while prior to such invention the cost of manual rolling prevented its spreading on a planetary scale.  That's a crucial detail to include in the global perspective knowing how combustion smoke proved devastating in terms of Public Health, which brings the matter of successive predatory governments determined to overtax cigarettes which only contributed to vilify those much further, always failing to fix it in the meantime.

 

Today's "vaping deaths" crisis can be thought to be a repetition of similar immature behaviour while it's clear at least to me that the consumption method shapes a user's profile.  Additionally, prohibition boosting the mercantile value for an underground market resulted in extreme THC-centric genetic selection quite likely promoting "fidelization" of vulnerable individuals (predisposed to habit disorders) - a situation which is perpetuated under "legal" regimes including in my country.

 

Worse, industrialization led to an ultimate form of mari-caca vilification under the form of "Pest Control Products" that even include/tolerate myclobutanil (ref.:  Zyklon!), or if not then possibly approved "beneficial" predatory mold besides predatory insects, while adoption of presumably health-wise alternative consumption tools expose to a mix of "traces" with their effects being multiplied while intense Conduction Heat in e-Cigs submit those contaminants to repeated/frequent cooking that promotes secondary reactions, presumably seasoned with a dozen (or 2!) PCPs sprayed systematiclly to overcome bad cultivation practices, etc., etc.

 

So, is it really cannabis killing youth today?  I don't think so as it's been around long enough to survive civilizations...  Then what else??

 

M'well, earlier this year in California LPs started to shop around for laboratories that made their "legal" shit pass pesticide tests more often than others, for example.  Then rejected batches made it to the "illicit" market somehow.  Which in a context of strong conductive heat in e-Cigs may very well have happened to precipitate a latent crisis, go figure.  In any case the plant itself ain't to blame until predators cease control IMHO.

 

In conclusion, the only safe way to consume cannabis today is to cultivate biological plants at home or delegate this task to a skilled person who can be trusted.  Then serious reflexion is required to determine what's a consumption method most appropriate as a smoking substitute which would remain acceptable even in chronic exposure scenarios.  Ultimately it's adults given fair options who shall transform the environment until rolling paper (made of wood fiber + glue!) finally disapears from all inventories, considering it's not possible to reach all kids more directly as history repeatedly demonstrated.  Only then the lost statistically elusive teenagers of planet Itnoc can be "saved", i believe; meanwhile expect many more generations to endure a fate similar to my own many decades ago.

 

M'well, that's one way for me to put it anyay.  Most of the rest escapes my perspective except i'd insist for metered dosage combined to a consumption method & ritual which no longer promotes abuse (and perhaps even replace it with self-awareness hints from biofeedback),  knowing with confidence it's counter-productive to aim for a crash against the tolerance wall (e.g. calling for frequent "T-Breaks") when in fact it proves much more satisfying (and economical) to ride on the safe side while acquiring enhanced appreciation of aroma/taste - a thing bigot prohibitionists just can't conceive nor accept as this would sound like further "banaleezation" to them.

 

Etc.

 

Good day, have fun!! 

Edited October 19, 2019 by Egzoset
Proof-reading.