Anderz

ACIM Journal

1,972 posts in this topic

I found something called the Orion group in the Law of One. The Orion group is the second layer of the breakaway civilization. Well, that's my hypothesis at the moment.

Quote

"Questioner: I’ll just ask about Orion. You mentioned Orion as a source of some of the contacts of UFOs. Can you tell me something of that contact, its purpose?

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, a simple example of intentions which are bad/good. This example is Adolf. This is your vibratory sound complex. The intention is to presumably unify by choosing the distortion complex called elite from a social memory complex and then enslaving, by various effects, those who are seen as the distortion of not-elite. There is then the concept of taking the social memory complex thus weeded and adding it to a distortion thought of by the so-called Orion group as an empire. The problem facing them is that they face a great deal of random energy released by the concept of separation. This causes them to be vulnerable as the distortions amongst their own members are not harmonized." - Law of One 7.14

It's only the questioner who mentions UFOs in the quote. It's Law of Confusion trickery again. Notice that Ra talks about an elite formed from a social memory complex and "adding to it a distortion", not as being space aliens. So what Ra describes sounds more like the cabal/deep state conspiracy than something extraterrestrial. And the adding of distortion is the second layer of the breakaway civilization, which literally is an added distortion.

And the Orion group is service to self, just like how I in a previous post described the second layer of the breakaway civilization as service to self.

Quote

"Those seeking intelligent infinity through the use of service to self create the same amount of power but, as we said, have constant difficulty because of the concept of separation which is implicit in the manifestations of the service to self which involve power over others. This weakens and eventually disintegrates the energy collected by such mind/body/spirit complexes who call the Orion group and the social memory complexes which comprise the Orion group." - Law of One 7.15

And since the second layer is only needed during the development of our civilization it will no longer be needed when we move into fourth density, hence this passage in the quote above: "... disintegrates the energy collected by such mind/body/spirit complexes who call the Orion group and the social memory complexes which comprise the Orion group."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a report from the Bank of China about the new digital currency:

Quote

"... the Internet, big data, blockchain and other technologies to establish a market-oriented micro-model of monetary policy [vii] to achieve accurate monetary policy Timeliness, timeliness, integrity, and scientificity; management of income big data, wealth big data, consumption big data, investment big data. These data are production materials themselves, and the marketization process of this digital asset will make the macroeconomic data more clear, complete, timely and accurate.

It is more important to expand the functions of currency and make monetary finance a tool and a means of creating value. Money has become a tool for creating value. It not only has the function of value scale, but also unifies currency and value scale. The process of currency creation is the process of value creation. Inflation and deflation no longer occur. Money, monetary theory and monetary policy have entered a new era and new world." - Paper of the People's Bank of China: Research on Market Coordination of Monetary Policy and Big Data Mechanism, Mar 22, 2020 (translated from Chinese with Google)

And this news article about the report says:

Quote

"The report stated that China’s digital currency’s main focus is on creating an innovative monetary system and developing a digital currency based on the human value that will make a major contribution both theoretically and practically to China and the entire human race." - TWJ News, Apr 28, 2020

To me it sounds promising and scary at the same time. A huge change of how money is regulated. Could create a really efficient and stable global economy. The scary thing is that their model is based on human value which sounds similar to a social credit score, which might be necessary in China, but seems horribly Orwellian from a western perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I came to think of a new radical theory about the coronavirus crisis. The ego armor causes the nervous system to become numbed out. That's very dangerous for the health of the body. Disclaimer: These are my own speculations. And when we get the flu or a cold, then that's exosomes trying to prevent too much numbing out.

What we have been told are viruses are actually exosomes, tiny particles that cells send out to other cells in the body. And a flu is a psychosomatic response. And the flu can spread between people through exosomes moving out of the body and into the environment. To be immune means that the body doesn't need to activate flu symptoms. The exosomes are messengers of information and depending on the need of the body-mind of the person receiving exosomes they can trigger flu symptoms or not.

The psychosomatic hypothesis of viruses can be tested on a large and global scale in this coronavirus crisis. One prediction is that COVID-19 will result in global herd immunity for all kinds of viruses for those people who raise their consciousness to a high enough level. Even bacterial infections might be a similar psychosomatic mechanism. Or it can be called a sociosomatic effect.

Quote

"Patients with medically unexplained symptoms comprise from 15% to 30% of all primary care consultations. Physicians often assume that psychological factors account for these symptoms, but current theories of psychogenic causation, somatization, and somatic amplification cannot fully account for common unexplained symptoms. Psychophysiological and sociophysiological models provide plausible medical explanations for most common somatic symptoms. Psychological explanations are often not communicated effectively, do not address patient concerns, and may lead patients to reject treatment or referral because of potential stigma. Across cultures, many systems of medicine provide sociosomatic explanations linking problems in family and community with bodily distress." - https://europepmc.org/article/med/15560312

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q has several new posts and two about the DNC, how they communicate. My guess is that they communicate in ways that the NSA can surveil. Q has said in earlier posts that they have it all.

The other Q posts I only briefly looked at because they were about the FBI and such. I believe that the FBI and other departments only played the roles of black hats to make the real black hats trap themselves. It seems to me that blaming the FBI for corruption is almost a red herring, even in Q posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I wrote earlier, I think e-money needs to be trackable because if the digital money is anonymous then criminal networks can spread like wildfire both nationally and internationally. However fully trackable e-money controlled by the government is a huge privacy issue since it will become mandatory and also the government will track everything. Today for example Amazon, VISA and commercial banks can track our use of money but they are separate companies and we as individuals have the freedom to use other companies if we find some to be too invasive in terms of privacy.

With the government being able to track all our use of money it's like a totalitarian situation. That's how many people will see it I think. A Spygate scandal might change that. How? By exposing huge money laundering and organized crime activities caused by LACK of tracking and by the private banking sector controlling basically all the money. So a possible scenario is that the coronavirus crisis ends in May in the U.S. and soon after that in May or June the Durham report is released to the public and the Spygate scandal starts and becomes huge during this summer.

Edited by Anderz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

G7 consists of some of the largest economies in the world, except.... China! And the G7 summit is in June and the G20 summit is in November this year. This means that the G7 countries will have to come up with a plan to combat China's digital currency, like immediately. So I expect that the G7 summit will be much about how to deal with China's e-yuan (also called e-RMB, DCEP and DC/EP).

One solution is that the G7 countries will come up with a plan for a global currency since otherwise China's e-yuan will become too dominating due to first-mover advantage. And then the G20 summit will be focused on how to realize the global digital currency. Alas, that's too late. China has been working on their digital currency for years. So in practice the solution I mentioned in a previous post might be used, which is to have China making its e-money technology open source. China will benefit from that because then their e-yuan becomes compatible with the e-dollar, e-euro and e-yen and so on instead of being seen as an international threat and be worked against.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We humans are like "batteries" used by the global ego and are running its "programs". And one of the key characteristics of the global ego is that it operates through planning, predicting and controlling the future. And the personal ego is a reflection of that behavior.

What if what the nonduality teachers say is true? That there are no actual separate doers. The Bible has verses about God being the only doer. And if we use the hypothesis Ramesh Balsekar has and in essence also mathematician Stephen Wolfram has, that the future is predetermined, then it might be possible to become more powerful than the global ego, not by trying to control or plan more ourselves but to do the opposite! The opposite is to have ZERO plans.

I can feel how my own ego wants to cling to the idea of personal control and planning, but that could be global ego programs! If the hypothesis of nondoership is correct, then it can be tested by dropping all personal planning and control of the future. If it works, then one's personal power will actually increase, because it's the correct perspective and loads of control and management effort is removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I learned that a global currency would remove the power governments have over regulating the nation's economy and implementing a global currency would be impractical it says on Investopedia. However there is also this:

Quote

"In addition, there would be somewhat of a leveling of the global playing field with one currency, since nations like China could no longer use currency exchange as a means to make their goods cheaper on the global market. For a long time, China has manipulated its currency, undervaluing it and therefore making the price of its exports more competitive across the world. This has been a detriment to the economies of other nations. With one global currency, China would not be able to do this, nor would it have a reason to do so." - Investopedia

Trump has been talking about a level playing field and has been ranting a lot about how China is manipulating their currency. Probably Democrats have also said the same thing. And now with China already testing their new e-yuan this makes the situation even more urgent for the U.S. and other countries.

Is a global currency possible to implement? As e-money, I think yes! Investopedia mentioned this:

Quote

"In March of 2009, U.S. Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, let it slip that he was "quite open" to the idea of an eventual move toward a global currency run by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Although many were surprised by this unusual announcement, the idea of a world currency is certainly not a new one." - Investopedia

So instead of the UN as I mentioned in another post it could be the IMF who will issue the global digital currency, or the BIS or the FSB, or some other new international agency. And commercial banks would be strictly regulated regarding how much reserves they need to have when they create credits and loans using fractional reserve banking.

And each country can have their own management of the e-money wallets for their citizens, although the tracking of transactions needs to be global with for example all intelligence agencies around the world having access their own countries' transaction data and some global Interpol or something having access to all the transaction data to prevent international crimes and terrorism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Self-control, self-discipline, self-protection, self-esteem, personal responsibility and duty. Those are programs that the global ego has been indoctrinating into us.

Quote

"The ego is thrown further off balance because it keeps its primary motivation from your awareness, and raises control rather than sanity to predominance. The ego has every reason to do this, according to the thought system which gave rise to it and which it serves. Sane judgment would inevitably judge against the ego, and must be obliterated by the ego in the interest of its self-preservation." - ACIM T-4.V.1:4-6

ACIM talks about how the ego operates through separate control. That's precisely the core program hammered into us by the global ego, which ACIM describes as "the thought system which gave rise to it". 

And here is the solution to this dilemma in ACIM:

Quote

"God holds your future as He holds your past and present. They are one to Him, and so they should be one to you. Yet in this world, the temporal progression still seems real. And so you are not asked to understand the lack of sequence really found in time. You are but asked to let the future go, and place it in God’s Hands. And you will see by your experience that you have laid the past and present in His Hands as well, because the past will punish you no more, and future dread will now be meaningless." - ACIM Lesson 194

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Holy Relationship in ACIM is much bigger than Gaia consciousness. Because the holy relationship is to be connected to Christ through the Holy Spirit and Christ is connected to and one with God. Jesus said that in the Father's house are many mansions. I have been thinking of "mansion" in this Bible verse as meaning world, but we can also think of it as a universe. So in God's house are many universes.

And Gaia is a unique yet tiny dot in the "house" of God. So even though Gaia consciousness is billions of times bigger than our personal ego consciousness it's still minuscule compared to the mind of God. Gaia consciousness is connected to all memories on the planet. So when we enter Gaia consciousness we need to change our relationship to our own personal memories.

Gaia consciousness is free of sin, so all sinful memories both in our own mind and other people's memories need to be accessed in a way free of sin. The word sin means to miss the mark, and especially in ego consciousness the belief in personal doership in memories is sin, because that's a false perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My previous scenario where countries would exchange their fiat currencies for e-money doesn't work for a global currency, because then for example China could continue to manipulate their yuan. Not good. Instead the global digital currency would be issued by for example the IMF and be competing with the existing currencies.

Ron Paul has talked about how it would be good to have competing currencies. And Ron Paul has libertarian free market views. And although he seems to be against a universal basic income (UBI) a global currency could be designed to be a competing currency.

And there are some conservative people who are for a UBI:

Quote

"Conservative views: support for basic income has been expressed by several people associated with conservative political views. While adherents of such views generally favor minimization or abolition of the public provision of welfare services, some have cited basic income as a viable strategy to reduce the amount of bureaucratic administration that is prevalent in many contemporary welfare systems. Others have contended that it could also act as a form of compensation for fiat currency inflation.[25][26][27]" - Wikipedia

One of the first use cases for a global digital currency is for efficient introduction of a UBI. And governments would get e-money from the IMF for the payment of a UBI. Another use case for the global digital currency is to compete with existing fiat currencies. And since the existing money is created and controlled dominantly by the private banking sector, the competition is between governments issuing the global digital currency and commercial banks etc creating ordinary fiat money. The U.S. government has the incentive to replace the USD with the new global currency to prevent China from manipulating their yuan and to prevent the private banking sector from keeping their power over money. The same with the governments of other countries. Even China will in the long run benefit from a global currency because their currency manipulation will lead to more conflict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think in practice that it will actually be easy to introduce a global digital currency. Governments today already have separate central banks that control their money. Not only that, the central banks have in reality very little power over the creation of money. The vast majority of all money is created by the private banking sector. So governments replacing their central banks with for example the IMF and a global currency seems like a simple task to me.

And each country can have their own e-money with the global digital currency as the actual money. For example the U.S. will have an e-dollar with the exact same value as the fiat dollar, and France would have e-euro, China e-yuan and so on. So for the citizens using e-money it would be the same as usual, with e-money cards or smartphone apps etc in addition to debit/credit cards and cash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, even commercial banks would have to create e-money using fractional reserve banking. So the competition will be between old money and new e-money. When the global digital currency is introduced the private banking sector has to stop creating their own money and switch over to creating e-money with a strictly regulated fractional reserve demand determined by the IMF.

Central banks would still serve a purpose such as issuing the e-money tokens for their national currency. For example the e-dollar will fluctuate in relation to the global currency depending on the market value of the old dollar in comparison to the global currency. The e-money is merely a tokenized form of the global currency. Also, central banks can act as suppliers of the e-money for commercial banks instead of the banks interacting directly with IMF, and only central banks will interact with IMF.

So underneath for example e-euro and e-yen is the same global currency. The e-money is just a label put on top of the global currency to make it match the old money in value. This means that exchanging between different e-money can be done directly and automatically since what happens in technicality is that it's always the same global currency and it's just a matter of switching e-money labels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ACIM says that the ego mistakes control for sanity. How to realize that in practice? One approach is to start with the premise that reality is already 100% in full control. Is that true? I believe so, but I'm not sure. So the premise is then for me a hypothesis that can be tested. And it can be tested from a nondual perspective, meaning that the 100% control and me are one. The ego control ACIM talks about is the belief in separate control. That's duality and that is what is causing the ego's mistaken perspective according to my hypothesis.

Depersonalization disorder is a state of experiencing life as a passive observer. That's duality! That's still a separate ego now even more stuck in an isolated state. The correct approach is to recognize the full control of everything, including one's own actions and thoughts. It's a bit tricky since the habit of separate control is so deeply ingrained in ego consciousness. In theory it's simple. It's just a matter of shifting one's perspective from separate control to recognizing control as a wholeness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see intellectually that there are no regrets because the past is a perfect manifestation. I can still feel regret sometimes but my mind is free from regrets. That's a great improvement in my life. I believe it's possible to even melt away the slight feeling of regret that can come at times. ACIM says:

Quote

"In Him you have no cares and no concerns, no burdens, no anxiety, no pain, no fear of future and no past regrets. In time­lessness you rest, while time goes by without its touch upon you, for your rest can never change in any way at all. You rest today. And as you close your eyes, sink into stillness. Let these periods of rest and respite reassure your mind that all its frantic fantasies were but the dreams of fever that has passed away. Let it be still and thankfully accept its healing. No more fearful dreams will come, now that you rest in God. Take time today to slip away from dreams and into peace." - ACIM Lesson 109

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the coronavirus is just a meme not a virus, then this may be correct:

Quote

"Trump says he's seen evidence suggesting coronavirus emerged from Wuhan lab, compares WHO to PR agency" - Fox News, Apr 30, 2020

But did the meme emerge from the Wuhan lab? I doubt it. A meme is based on information, not biology. I'm curious about how China will reply to Trump's suggestion.

Quote

"A meme (/miːm/ MEEM[1][2][3]) is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning referring to a particular phenomenon or theme.[4] A meme acts as a unit for carrying cultural ideas, symbols, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena with a mimicked theme. Supporters of the concept regard memes as cultural analogues to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures.[5]" - Wikipedia

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ego is incredibly focused on its own individual self. Even when the ego thinks of so-called loved ones, it's the ego's own memories and ideas about other people it relates to, not a true connection with others. ACIM calls these ego traits special relationships.

The useful purpose of the ego is to create unique individuals and for that purpose the ego is an excellent vehicle. But the ego is also a fake image! And that produces a lot of suffering. Fortunately the ego is just a temporary stage of development.

The holy relationship in ACIM is different from the ego's special relationships.

Quote

"This holy relationship, lovely in its innocence, mighty in strength, and blazing with a light far brighter than the sun that lights the sky you see, is chosen of your Father as a means for His Own plan. 2 Be thankful that it serves yours not at all. 3 Nothing entrusted to it can be misused, and nothing given it but will be used. 4 This holy relationship has the power to heal all pain, regardless of its form. 5 Neither you nor your brother alone can serve at all. 6 Only in your joint will does healing lie. 7 For here your healing is, and here will you accept Atonement. 8 And in your healing is the Sonship healed because your will and your brother's are joined." - ACIM T-22.VI.4.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the alternative community experts present many different theories and opinions. That's actually good! It's a decentralized system. If one expert would have all the answers then that would be a centralized system, and that's fragile and also prone to disinfo and false dogma. It requires more work and openmindedness to figure out the truth with a decentralized alternative community but it's a more robust approach.

I cherry pick information that fits my own model and that's a form of self-bias, but it makes me able to form my own opinions. And if new information is presented that seems more correct than my model, I can switch or adjust my model since I don't need to defend it. An example of information that I resonate with is this new video by Bruce Lipton where he talks about the caterpillar-butterfly analogy again from around 5 minutes:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine how difficult it is for a professional expert to change his or her theories. Not only is there risk of ridicule, loss of social status and even loss of career. It's also extremely difficult in a mainstream expert position to go against the mainstream dogma.

As amateurs we can change our opinions instantly almost. One example is how I up until very recently believed that viruses are real. Then I started wondering about how the heck viruses can hijack the extremely complicated machinery of cells to replicate themselves. That's like a car inserted into a computer factory makes the manufacturing machinery starting to produce cars instead of computers. Ridiculous!

And then I learned about exosomes and some experts I found just a month ago or something like that said that viruses are exosomes. And then I thought wow, that's pretty obvious. Exosomes are something cells are designed to produce. So I basically immediately changed my belief about viruses. And it may turn out that viruses actually are different than exosomes, and that they hijack the exosome "factory" in cells, but my belief at the moment is that there aren't any viruses. For example polio is caused by DDT, not by a virus one expert said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it turns out that the mainstream view is based on a huge heap of lies, false dogma, manipulation, disinfo, diversions, whitewashing, deception, propaganda, psyops, social engineering and so on, should we get angry? I think non-serious anger is fine. Serious anger I'm more suspicious about. Because the fallen world, what I call the global ego, is built on those kinds of false views for good reasons.

I see a deliberate and good purpose behind the ego state of separation, which is as a mechanism for maximizing growth, development and uniqueness. Personally I get angry at the idea of mandatory vaccines. That's because of my own fear! And my approach at the moment is to focus on my fear instead of my anger. When the fear dissolves, the serious kind of anger also dissolves along with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now