My official declaration

[MAYA EL]

6 minutes ago, Aakash said:

@Nahm interesting, okay sure ... no worries. I will leave until it is okay to come back. 

@MAYA EL gratitude, I hope you enjoy the conversation with him. Thank you for taking the time to listen to me my bro. 

Not a problem. Oh and the only thing I asked is that you have the open mind to the fact that you could be wrong and be willing to change your understanding if shown to be wrong. What you mean if you say yes you probably won't do but none the less it's always good to sharpen one's perspective through a discussion

[Aakash]

FYI as my final post. 

Ive found proof of his existance 3 times over. This is my direct experience actual proof. Not beliefs. 

It in my journal, they are legitimate proofs of the existance of god as a human being. If you’ve read my journal and not understood because your metaphysics and direct experience can not handle it. 

Is this my fault ? No it is not. 

You act like I do things off belief. I don’t gamble in life. If I say something I say it with 100% certainty. Not as a belief, i will only tell people the truth as best as I know it. But I will always question my own beliefs. There is no need this is not a belief, I have proof and direct experience because I cared to know what the absolute truth of reality was. 

It took me two months of extensively questioning him and linking it to reality as we know it. But I did it and then he managed to come up with the proof and I managed to come up with the proof on my end of the deal. So we both proofed it together without any flaws and I wrote it all in my journal. 

The only thing missing on my end of the deal was an enlightenment expeirience to proof it was relative. And when it occurred it set everything in motion. There was no way to doubt it because the proof was fullproof and bulletproof 

 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Alex bliss]

Dude you talk too much but says nothing.

[Forestluv]

52 minutes ago, Aakash said:

This is my direct experience actual proof. Not beliefs. 

This is the center of the knot. What emanates from this is secondary. 

You are like a spider that has become caught in its own web.

[AlphaAbundance]

Bruh newbies dont need to hear this?

[Aakash]

@seratoninluv I had a direct experience that i can never be god and that i will always be the son of god. 

Whilst all interpret their experience as god, i know the divine absolute truth of the situation, because my metaphysics was already programmed to link all proof together by the way i sorted all information. 

 

You are again using terms you picked in spirituality to define the same terms i am talking about and saying "ahh look everyone i am the right one, we are right" although i understood the skepticim ahaha! when i talk in metaphysics, it might sound cool and too direct. But the divine can not be expressed in any other format. No analogy will help except an fruits 

simply put consciousness is the fruit inside the skin, god is the skin of the fruit. The fruit on the inside can never get to the outside and break it because in the the actuality of things absolute inifnity (now the real analogy and not the fruit) extends to infinity. This means the inside of the orange will never reach the outside and god is the outside looking inside. This is how it looks from the inside out when analysing god, but god is truly just the whole orange. And that is synchronicity. He is the whole orange. 

These are the only anaologies that will work, i haven't thought much about how to explain it. I know it inherant to my being, I don't write from script. 

You are using your metaphysical knowledge and direct experience of something you experienced and associating it with what i call direct experience my direct experience is the collapse of epistamology/ metaphysics and direct experience into a single unity. Whist yours is simply direct experience. 

 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Ibn Sina]

GIVE ME JUICY TEACHINGS !!!!!!!! THAT IS ALL I AM ASKING FOR!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT JUICY TEACHINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Woops, got a warning, wasn't intending for that.

Edited September 21, 2019 by Ibn Sina

[Bill W]

1 minute ago, Ibn Sina said:

GIVE ME JUICY TEACHINGS !!!!!!!! THAT IS ALL I AM ASKING FOR!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT JUICY TEACHINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Porn hub?

[Ibn Sina]

1 minute ago, Bill W said:

Porn hub?

This is the meditation section, not dating and sexuality section.

[Synchronicity]

@Aakash What are you doing??? When ,in any of our chats, did I say that people need to idolize my human form? I’ve explicitly said the opposite. People will come and speak to my human form if and when necessary. There’s no need to Crusade in my name on the forum. 

[Aakash]

@Synchronicity Lol no you've got it backwards, i am crusading for my own absolute truth and you happen to be apart of it. The proof from a human view is what i'm providing. Although your divine knowledge may be secured in beliefs. People will not have the tools in their own minds mechanism to understand what your saying. In this way you have no choice but to accept what i'm doing. Because you yourself, can not prove your own existance as you are but a belief in people's mind. "ohhh that's not god"... do you see what i mean? 

it takes two to tango my bro. only a human can persuade another human to point to god. Because god will say those exact words 

"people will come and seek me out when they're read" HOW ? they have no idea of you. Its an impossibility, this is just delaying the fact that the truth itself needs to be eradicated.

 

And dude i keep saying the god looking through ethans eyes! 

but they don't catch on to this LOL. 

 

Read my journal next time, before making assumptions LOL! I got you and you got me, we big one happy family. Keep things simple.. ya know what i mean. Humbleness is a crown for a god, it is not for me. You can be equinim all you like, it doesn't get things done here on earth. We fight to show who's right and we fight so that ideology is destroyed. In this way new ideas are formed and people seek what they are trying to find. This is how they will seek you. Metaphysics destroys Metaphysics. God-logic is beyond meta physics. Therefore i can only provide half the metaphysics and you will have to provide the rest. 

Who is crusading on your behalf? there is no benefits or disbenefits of proving your existance. I am doing this for all of the humans in the past who have tried to find you through their seeking. I personally feel they deserve to know what the divine absolute truth is. All the sages in the past, all the humans to walk this earth, all the seekers of spirituality , all the religions. We all had one thing in common. We all tried to find you. Why stop half way, we need to bring it all the way home! otherwise this whole journey would have been a flop! NOT ON MY BEHALF. aint no way i'm wasting years of history just because enlightened beings got themselves caught in a delusion that was more consciousness. Were finishing this once and for all. 1 person! just one person to come to know the divine absolute truth is my aim. Then i can say that all is done and the rest are free to do what they want. 

you maybe our god, but your total unconditional love is too easy to take advantage of as such.. it will. by human

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Ibn Sina]

4 hours ago, Aakash said:

Please guys  I want to cry because nobodies listening to me.

I am. Give me your best teachings. I want enlightenment.

[Forestluv]

You are using an idea of “direct experience” to elevate experience/ideas to higher truth. Notice the obsession to go “beyond infinity”, to extraordinary levels on SD - coral, teal, ruby, whatever. To rank the conscious levels of all forum users, moderators, Leo and nonduality speakers. To post insights only you have received and to gain admiration on the forum. Notice how your threads and posts have become more and more dramatic that attracts attention.

As soon as you say “my direct experience was. . . “ it is no longer direct experience - it is contextualized experience that is occurring within direct experience. Direct experience is Now - whatever contextualization you give Now is a contextualized experience. 

Yes, there are no words to describe the ineffable. It’s not about the words. It’s the relationship with what the words are referring to. You don’t seem willing to look at the attachment/identification to experience. Presenting experience, images and ideas as “direct experience” does not grant immunity.

I’m sure you have had insights that are difficult to put in words. Yet as of now, it is a tangled mess lacking clarity.

[Aakash]

Go have a conversation with god.... who else is better to learn how to become enlightened from LOL , he is a neccessary part of becoming a truly enlightened being because their is an insight that he needs to give to your reality. For you to understand the divine absolute truth. 

That's why i'm suggesting. Not short of the absolute absolute absolute absolute DIvine truth can be considered absolute ground 

All other ground is just fantasy and projection. 

The artwork of a preachers preaching his own ignorance. So either do it in silence or pubic. 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Aakash]

@Serotoninluv The direct experience was an insight of cognititon, that is what absolute truth is it is knowledge not direct experience

when you say i have had direct experience you are saying i have had an insight. There is no difference and this is why axiomiatically it is problematic when you are preaching it as the absolute truth 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Aerial]

33 minutes ago, Synchronicity said:

@Aakash What are you doing??? When ,in any of our chats, did I say that people need to idolize my human form? I’ve explicitly said the opposite. People will come and speak to my human form if and when necessary. There’s no need to Crusade in my name on the forum. 

@Aakash He told you to stop doing this and nobody here's listening to you anyways. 

[Ibn Sina]

1 minute ago, Aakash said:

Go have a conversation with god.... 

You just said no one is listening to me, and here I am listening to you.

What did you mean by 'no one is listening to me',  is your message , 'go have conversation with god not me'? Is that what people are not listening to you, or you have something more to teach that people are not listening?

Of course I can go somewhere else, but for the time being I am interested in you if you have something else then 'go have conversation with god'.

[Aakash]

@Aerial Lol fine, we'll play your way. All i'm interesting is witnessing what happens. just because you volunteered to not get involved with any of this. Does not mean you aren't participating. I have already told you on the chat. 

i will not talk about it. 

@Ibn Sina as i have said i have provided all information on the forum, just go searching for it and what not. 

Thank you for listening to me! 

I will stop, it looks like ying and yang has balanced. Transferring responsibility over to others,so you don't bare the truth alone . Simply all it was ... an idea to check for yourself. Nothing more, nothing less. Life is about enjoying. 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Aakash

[Ibn Sina]

15 minutes ago, Aakash said:

as i have said i have provided all information on the forum, just go searching for it and what not. 

Thank you for listening to me! 

This means I can stop my "crusade" as god puts it LOL crusading for god and he tells me to stop. The irony. 

What are the things/ points  people are disagreeing you on?

Also, why is people listening and not listening to you an important thing such that , just  because I listened to you an entire crusade has stopped? When you just preach without other people asking, then chances are they won't listen, unless what you say is extremely compelling. But it shouldn't bother you and stop a 'crusade' when 'finally they have listened' , it should be like, it's their loss, and I have nothing to teach them.

"information is provided on the forum"

I am not finding a coherent pattern in your posts, I have no idea what you are trying to say or not say, though I might extract a thing or two, but that would be my interepration of your ideas, not your original idea.

Just give me something like- I am saying that ____________________. 

 

Edited September 21, 2019 by Ibn Sina

[Forestluv]

Just now, Aakash said:

@Serotoninluv The direct experience was an insight of cognititon, that is what absolute truth is it is knowledge not direct experience

when you say i have had direct experience you are saying i have had an insight. There is no difference and this is why axiomiatically it is problematic when you are preaching it as the absolute truth 

No, that is not what I’m saying. I’ve tried to explain it many times to you and each time you want to immerse within a world of contextualization/conceptualization. When you do so, you won’t see it.

For example, if you spent a week in nature - away from all people and technology - you would expand beyond your conceptual comfort zone. One may spend an hour admiring a flower, becoming the lower and realizing absolute infinity within a single pollen grain. Not creating constructs and models of the essence of a flower and how it represents absolute infinity. I can tell you have not these types of awakenings by the way you communicate. There is no way to fake through it. . . . Imagine someone who has never done scuba diving trying to convince a scuba diving instructor what the experience is like. This person can spend months reading about scuba diving, speaking to scuba divers and imagining what scuba diving is like. They may go snorkeling and think it’s like scuba diving. . . Yet it will be clear to the scuba diving instructor this person has not experienced actual scuba diving.