Being-Consiousness-Bliss

[Mulky]

Which of these 3 can be known? Being cannot be known, it can only be existed as.  Consiousness cannot be known, it can only be existed as.  Bliss can be known.  The bliss we are concerned with is the true bliss of being-consiousness bliss.  If this is the only aspect that can be witnessed, then once this bliss is known at least once, maybe it is best to pursue this bliss within, as the most reliable beacon of all observable things.

[Guru Fat Bastard]

The three are one.The inherent bliss (peace), of pure consciousness-being, is the absence of an illusory separation and/or the mistaken sense of being a temporary,separate,finite individual. The individual "I" or "me", is only an idea, giving the false impression of being real. The individual looking for bliss is the cause of the absence of bliss. The individual,taking itself to be a thing (a person,a body), will only find bliss in another thing, or object. It looks to maintain it's sense of "realness" by seeking and obtaining the object while still keeping its sense of being an individual self.. Being consciousness bliss, is the one,unchanging reality,absent of an illusory,separate self seeking it as an object.  Being consciousness bliss is, what is,when the sense of false,illusory self, falls away.

But nothing really "falls away",as it was never real,or existed in the first place.

Edited August 4, 2019 by Guru Fat Bastard