Gods connection to personality types

[integral]

This is a fun connection i made not saying any of this is true/accurate, just a observation from my limited point of view.  

Leos description of god seems like the exact essense of the INTP personality type.

Its as if he dug deep into himself and pulled out the core of his programming and interpreted that as god.

Hes describing the ultimate INTP achievement, to know/be/see/experience/love everything simultaneously. 

His enlightenment experiences/interpretations/explanations are like the core of the INTP brain structure/reward system. 

 

[hamedsf]

direct experience occurs without any distortion to any body 

but that person could distort and manipulate the first-hand experience deliberately 

and the teachings of Leo seems with less impurities, as far as I'm concerned 

the irony is that he's describing the indescribable nature of reality and that could be interpreted differently on a person by person basis.

for instance : you may hear that he's saying you're GOD, imagining to be a person, if you don't have any enlightenment experiences, your ego would get in your way and would think that he's GOD imagining the person! you get the point? a simple thought of ego doesn't equal the direct experience. 

hope you understand.

[integral]

@hamedsf Is it possible that there is a connection between someones experience of god (not person interpretation) and there MBTI personality type?

Differences in direct experience?

Edited October 13, 2020 by integral

[Preety_India]

23 minutes ago, integral said:

@hamedsf Is it possible that there is a connection between someones experience of god (not person interpretation) and there MBTI personality type?

Differences in direct experience?

Not at all. MBTI nothing to do with it 

God does not have a personality type. 

Also God is not outside the universe. God is the universe. 

God is not a persona. 

You'll have better grasp of God in the following paragraph. ( Taken from a channel.) 

(God is the universe and connection is the answer) 

Edited October 14, 2020 by Preety_India

[integral]

@Preety_India Im having a hard time understanding the comment, but the part i do understand is im the narcissist hahah. One step at a time then... 

- Connection is the answer. Universe is a network of energies interdependent. Balancing energies and duality is reality. 

What is energy? Would be great if each school used the same vocabulary... 

---

Another idea: What if reality is a onion of many layers where each layer is as sophisticated or more to this one? Lets image this experience is layer 1 the universe, the next layer 2 would contain and be interconnected with the universe/layer 1. We keep going like for infinite layers. 

Things that can be experienced at layer 2 cannot be experienced at layer 1. Layer 1 is a a small part chipped off layer 2.

If we imagine all this higher complexity that is playing a major role in layer 1,

Its possible all direct experiences of god are just layer 2.

Layer 2 can also express systems that govern personality traits, making perosnality types foundational to layer 1 reality. 

Its possible we are part of a larger system that beyond our ability to experience. Like the cells in our body are part of a large system (human) producing a finite experience. We are part of a larger system producing something unexplanable? The individual cell cannot possible understand the whole. They only see there little cell experiences. 

Finite experiences interconnected producing a larger finite experience... repeat and circulate 

Edited October 14, 2020 by integral

[Leo Gura]

Lol

GOD. IS. EVERYTHING!

Without a finite expression God can have no expression at all. All expressions of God must be finite because the infinite is infinitely inexhaustible.

[RichnNL]

On 7/1/2019 at 5:17 PM, integral said:

This is a fun connection i made not saying any of this is true/accurate, just a observation from my limited point of view.  

Leos description of god seems like the exact essense of the INTP personality type.

Its as if he dug deep into himself and pulled out the core of his programming and interpreted that as god.

Hes describing the ultimate INTP achievement, to know/be/see/experience/love everything simultaneously. 

His enlightenment experiences/interpretations/explanations are like the core of the INTP brain structure/reward system. 

 

A danger with personalities types is to personify them, if you are familiar with 16 personalities one trap people get lost into is worry about the characters of INTP for example. With personalities you have to look at it as behaviours or characteristics working in a 1 way direction so an INTP person will often do or act like x y and z because they are an INTP. Its dangerous or misleading to say you did x y and z and therefore you are an INTP do not do this you will mistype others and yourself and ummm GOD. 

And just to elaborate a bit more I have obverse that it is easier for some personality types "get closer to god" and more difficult for others for example someone who is lead Extraverted Sensory is probably going to be more interested in people and get lost in the social aspects of spirituality like debating over what is or what is not spriality if Jesus was legit or if the Buddha was really enlightened etc. It will be far more difficult for them to go inside. 

Hope that helps

[integral]

5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Lol

GOD. IS. EVERYTHING!

Without a finite expression God can have no expression at all. All expressions of God must be finite because the infinite is infinitely inexhaustible.

Are all direct experiences of god finite expressions? 

I think i conflated 2 topics:

- what is direct experience?

- "this" finite expression is far more complex then we realize. Its infinitely layered in complexity. 

Did you experience how insanely complex "this" finite expression is? I think something is being simulated here of mind-blowing layered complexity and interconnectedness. We cant appreciate it because the fabric of these layers are concepts/ideas impossible to have.   

Did you experience all the impossible concepts during the trips?

Did you experience all the impossible systems? 

Did you experience all finite expression permutations? 

Did you experience the totality of each of does finite expressions?

 

Never did psychedelics so wondering these things... 

[Leo Gura]

11 minutes ago, integral said:

Are all direct experiences of god finite expressions?

In a sense, yes.

Quote

I think i conflated 2 topics:

- what is direct experience?

- "this" finite expression is far more complex then we realize. Its infinitely layered in complexity. 

Did you experience how insanely complex "this" finite expression is? I think something is being simulated here of mind-blowing layered complexity and interconnectedness. We cant appreciate it because the fabric of these layers are concepts/ideas impossible to have.   

Of course every finite experience is infinitely complex. It's not just complex, it's infinitely complex. And yet it's still finite.

Quote

Did you experience all the impossible concepts during the trips?

Did you experience all the impossible systems? 

Did you experience all finite expression permutations? 

Did you experience the totality of each of does finite expressions?

Obviously not. There is an infinite amount of formed experiences which I have never and will never experience. That is not necessary.

I don't need to experience every dog in the universe to understand what a dog is. I can grok dog as an abstraction in one fell swoop.

The highest levels of truth are pure abstractions.

[integral]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

1 hour ago, integral said:

Are all direct experiences of god finite expressions?

In a sense, yes.

If direct experience is a finite expression then it is not god? paradox?

 

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Of course every finite experience is infinitely complex. It's not just complex, it's infinitely complex. And yet it's still finite.

Is absolute finite possible? 

 

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Obviously not. There is an infinite amount of formed experiences which I have never and will never experience. That is not necessary.

I don't need to experience every dog in the universe to understand what a dog is. I can grok dog as an abstraction in one fell swoop.

Is it possible there is more then one god? Infinite gods? "this" finite expression is part of this god? Direct experience of "this" god?