Whats the difference between Zen and Vipassana?

[lmfao]

Shinzen Young wrote this in one of his blogs https://www.shinzen.org/from-vipassana-to-zen/

Quote

However, the style of practice in Zen is radically different from, almost diametrically the opposite of, the style of practice in Vipassana (although, when things go well, the results should be similar). In Zen practice, one first learns how to flow with impermanence (expansion and contraction, anicca) through doing—riding on the rhythm of a highly ritualized schedule. After doing impermanence for many years, the Zen practitioner will begin to see that impermanence is also the nature of their sensory experience—both subjective (image, talk, emotional body) and objective (sight, sound, physical body). In Vipassana, the order is reversed: a person first carefully observes the senses, sees their impermanent nature and (hopefully) later learns to express that impermanence dynamically through their energy and actions.

So how might a strict zen monk differ from a strict Vipassana monk in their practice? Thoughts on this quote?

 

Theres this video as well 

 

I know that I myself like being bouncy. Anyone experienced in this matter and know what the differences are?

I've perhaps been exposed to how zen people talk, but idk about vipassana.

 

Edited June 12, 2019 by lmfao