.com vs .org when being applied to a life purpose

[Key Elements]

Explain the difference when it's being applied to a life purpose. When a life purpose is a .com, it's an early stage startup capable of scaling and growth. But, in the beginning, it's also capable of self-employment. Yes, this could be very useful when jobs are scarce or when you have to move. You won't lose your self-employment if you're on the internet. Tax deduction is applied when it's a home business.

Rules are different in a .org . The structure is not meant for scaling and profit.

Another thing with .com is that it's more capable of being in the Maslow pyramid structure. Self-transcendence is a must at the top. It will not be at the base. We can't all be "monks" and "sages."  That would be .org structure.

If you go straight into .org, your lifestyle may not be stable because you skipped through stage orange and never really understood entrepreneurship and how to apply it in your life. There are drawbacks if you're just a .org (green) lifestyle.

There is nothing wrong with .org . It's just that if you only do that, skipping through orange, you may end up like this monk. She needed help. She had serious cancer throughout her body. Her fellow monks were unable to raise enough money to send her to a proper hospital. So, she called her brother, Kiyosaki, Trump's friend , another real estate tycoon to save her life. I think they did a book together so that she could understand passive income.

Just sharing my thoughts.

[Karla]

That last part is interesting!

[Key Elements]

Just wanted to share some more points because I find this topic crucial...

A life purpose that's also a .com will include the following:

• Win-win situations
• Challenges are opportunities.
• Actions speak louder than words.
• Something that most ppl can relate to at first glance. Being eye catching is a plus.
• Able to include the complete Maslow structure, including self-transcendence in some way (although not required)
• Teaching/learning (esp a useful skill) for survival and beyond, covering the foundation of Maslow. Goes with the saying, "Give a man a fish; feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish; feed him for life."
• Different techniques for teaching and learning. (Eg. Learning through art, cooking, exercising, teaching for children, teaching for slow learners, etc.) The roles for teaching and learning can be reversed.
• Very inclusive of all perspectives, but does not let down its guards when it gets down to business and the nitty gritty. Knows limitations.

 

A .com life purpose with self-transcendence will include:

• Gets down to the point when self-transcendence is being pointed out.
• Takes into consideration: Only those who are ready to hear it will hear it. Truth isn't taught. It's realized.
• To be discussed at the top of Maslow's, not at the base, or close to the base.

I always thought that the Shaolin monks as a group (big picture) is a good example of .com/life purpose/self-transcendence, although some features need to be more developed if a person is going to learn from them--like pitching, for example. 

[Key Elements]

@Leo GuraI just thought of something in our most recent discussion. The average Joe is too lazy to dig through to find the needle in the haystack. Not so easy to build the obstacle, is it? We can't build a candy haystack. All the candies will be eaten and the needle ignored.