Leo's biggest hater?

[Aakash]

@DrewNows don't get the wrong idea, i'm not critising it, i'm complimenting it lol, just in slang

[Forestluv]

4 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Wow, this is so dismissive and argumentative.  I was expecting you to be more impartial.

You know what you were doing. I am standing up to you. I doubt many people have.

If you want to call me a bad scientist that makes overly hasty judgements, is biased and that I cannot see that due to my own Ego and wanting to protect other Egos, that is totally fine. Just say that. I don't care. Don't play these manipulate passive aggressive games.

Have the courage to say it directly to me. Passive aggressiveness is for cowards.

[Forestluv]

4 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Dude, I know you’re a moderator, but I think it’s gone to your head, I really think so.  You need to examine how you act too, not just point the finger at me.  

If you want to call me a bad scientist that makes overly hasty judgements, is biased and that I cannot see that due to my own Ego and wanting to protect other Egos, that is totally fine. Just say that. I don't care. Don't play these manipulate passive aggressive games.

This is not about moderation. This is about honesty and being upfront. Passive aggressiveness is really unhealthy and causes harm. I personally don't care about what you think about me. I'm calling you out on this. If you want to say it. Then say it to me straight up.

[Arhattobe]

Who is it that gets triggered? No one. Triggeredness just arises. No one here got triggered. No one here did anything. Let’s move on.... wait. There is nothing to move. Nothing to on. 

Very profound. Very deep. 

Edited April 3, 2019 by Arhattobe

[cetus]

 lets have a reality check.............. Yep reality is still an illusion.

[Forestluv]

Just now, Joseph Maynor said:

My intention was not to impugn your character outside of the very limited set of issues that I raised in my first response to your first post.

Joe that is totally fine. Yet, indirectly calling someone bad at their life-long career, biased and unable to see these deficiencies because it threatens their ego and that they want to protect the Egos of others are big accusations. Personally I don't care. I think it is the trying to cover it up and shift responsibility for ones passive aggressiveness that can cause the greater harm. I've seen this so many times. It causes harm to others Joe. It is not a decent way to treat other human beings. If you want to criticize me or anyone else, then just do it directly. I can take it. Just cut the games.

[Arhattobe]

Seretonin you seem like a nice enough guy. Didn’t read the whole thing, but are genuine and show vulnerability which is a good quality. 

Joe. You are, lol well, not as much, but have integrity internally I believe. 

Arguments happens. Let’s move on : ) 

Edited April 3, 2019 by Arhattobe

[Forestluv]

8 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I’m not playing games.  End this please.  Put a fork in this please.

Joe. I went through your post line by line and clearly explained the game that you were playing. 

You don't seem open to looking at this and I understand. I have been in this situation myself. You are asking me to stop pressing and I respect that.

[Manjushri]

is this topic the  youtube comment section of the video or what

[Forestluv]

10 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

That’s your contention, and of course I have not had the chance to respond to the way you framed the issues.  So just stop with everything.  This is done.  Good day to you.  

You had many opportunities to do so. I know how hard it can be to look at. I've been on the other end of this. You don't seem open or willing to look at this and I respect that and will stop pressing you on it. Yet I want to be clear: in the future if you want to criticize me that is totally fine. Yet say your criticism to me directly. Doing so indirectly through passive aggressiveness is an unhealthy mode of communication imo.

If you would like discuss this further via PM, I would be happy to do so.

[thesmileyone]

Could be worse...

 

[purerogue]

25 minutes ago, thesmileyone said:

Could be worse...

This guys has my kind of humor.

 

[nistake]

Personally, I find it funny how triggered this guy is

Though, the interview invitation was a pretty cool move from him, I'll give him that.

[WelcometoReality]

3 hours ago, purerogue said:

This guys has my kind of humor.

 

He is a little bit off but funny indeed. 

[sgn]

8 hours ago, Rilles said:

Why do you care about someone criticizing Leo? Do you have something invested in him? Be careful not to make Leo your guru and placing him on a pedestal. Just do the work. 

I don't really care. Thanks for the speech.

[fortifyacacia3]

I feel like he finds real objections to schools of thought but inflates them to all of spirituality. Leo's said before spirituality is nihlism actualized. Solipsism, pantheism, and many things that show certain aspects of the universe but still falls under their own limitations. He doesn't really integrate the nature of things but attributes a concept as a tell-all. Valid behind his efforts to debunk.

[Aaron p]

15 hours ago, sgn said:

This "unSpirituality" guy is back at it again. This time criticising Leo's latest video.

Thoughts? 

 

7:10 I thought he said "god is that which transcends FUCK." HAHA

[Pouya]

@Dumb Enlightened he mentions in the intro video that this videos are for entertainment purposes 

I like the guy and he likes to talk shit about people. 

He actually has experience but I assume he is close-minded and defensive.

[legendary]

I just checked this guy's channel out. All his criticism of Actualized.org boils down to 3 things:

• This guy walked the same path as Leo 30 years ago, and based on his experience, Leo is wrong about neuroscience, Quantum Mechanics, etc. It's not science, but Leo who is making an epistemological blunder by buying into new-agey and woo-woo concepts. The brain is primary, subjectivity is secondary.
• Leo is solipsistic & nihilistic. This guy argues that there exists an external physical reality which will exist even without a conscious observer, which is in opposition to what Leo teaches (PFA)
• How do we know that he is correct? Because he has worked with his Kundalini for years and all his chakras are opened.

If we could weigh his opinions against Leo's, we have a more objective way of determining who is correct and who isn't.

[Dumb Enlightened]

2 hours ago, Pouya said:

@Dumb Enlightened he mentions in the intro video that this videos are for entertainment purposes 

I like the guy and he likes to talk shit about people. 

He actually has experience but I assume he is close-minded and defensive.

indeed, I laughed a lot, because of his ignorance hahahahahaahahaah