Is Consciousness the Unified Field?

[Moment]

 

Just saw this YouTube lecture and I believe he is really onto something. I don't think the science community is taking him seriously, some even laugh at him. Might be because they are stuck in the materialist paradigm? Would love to hear some thoughts

 

 

[cetus]

Consciousness is the ultimate unified field that science is searching for. Look at the double slit experiment. look at "spooky action at a distance". It all points to consciousness being primary. Science will grow by leaps and bounds once it admits that consciousness needs to be taken very seriously in any formula. No lab experiment has ever been carried out without the presents of consciousness being there first. John Hagelin deserves to share the Nobel prize for advancing science in this area along with David Bohm.

[Shin]

150 years ago he would have been burned by blue scientists.

We live in a good society don't you think ?

[Shadowraix]

This is probably the best explanation for consciousness from a scientific perspective I've heard.

[Forestluv]

2 hours ago, cetus56 said:

Consciousness is the ultimate unified field that science is searching for. Look at the double slit experiment. look at "spooky action at a distance". It all points to consciousness being primary. Science will grow by leaps and bounds once it admits that consciousness needs to be taken very seriously in any formula. No lab experiment has ever been carried out without the presents of consciousness being there first. John Hagelin deserves to share the Nobel prize for advancing science in this area along with David Bohm.

Also, the scientific collective consciousness makes a subconscious assumption that we are objectively observing the subject from *outside* the system. The scientific collective consciousness has not yet realized that there is a single underlying field, that includes both observer and subject. 

[Preetom]

2 hours ago, cetus56 said:

Consciousness is the ultimate unified field that science is searching for

But too bad scientists will never 'it'. They are looking for that which enables the very act of looking 

[Forestluv]

14 minutes ago, Preetom said:

But too bad scientists will never 'it'. They are looking for that which enables the very act of looking 

And 200 years ago scientists were searching for a tiny person in the head of a sperm. Scientists evolve and the scientific collective consciousness expands over time.

Currently science is centered at Orange. Just wait until science becomes centered at Yellow and Turquoise. Buckle your seatbelt. . .

[Preetom]

Just now, Serotoninluv said:

And 200 years ago scientists were searching for a tiny person in the head of a sperm. Scientists evolve and the scientific collective consciousness expands over time.

No matter how evolved science gets, it will never be possible to objectify or manipulate Consciousness. 

I mean absolute Consciousness, not the subject-object human consciousness.

[Forestluv]

4 minutes ago, Preetom said:

No matter how evolved science gets, it will never be possible to objectify or manipulate Consciousness. 

I mean absolute Consciousness, not the subject-object human consciousness.

That is through a lens of Orange level science.

The human mind cannot currently conceive of Turqoise level science.  

[Preetom]

7 minutes ago, Serotoninluv said:

That is through a lens of Orange level science.

The human mind cannot currently conceive of Turqoise level science.  

if you mean manipulating phenomena, then sure the mind has no clue what science will be able to accomplish in next 2000 years.

Science is all about study and manipulation of phenomena, something whose existence isn't recognized by Absolute Consciousness in the first place.

[Forestluv]

21 minutes ago, Preetom said:

if you mean manipulating phenomena, then sure the mind has no clue what science will be able to accomplish in next 2000 years.

Science is all about study and manipulation of phenomena, something whose existence isn't recognized by Absolute Consciousness in the first place.

That is within the current scientific paradigm.

There is also the perspective that reality is testing itself with the tool of science, yet hasn’t let the scientists in on the secret yet. It’s humor in the movie.

[StephenK]

1 hour ago, Preetom said:

But too bad scientists will never 'it'. They are looking for that which enables the very act of looking 

To be fair, don't all spiritual texts/dialogues/conversations have that exact problem? Who is to say that science will not one day 'meet' spirituality and merge? 

[Nahm]

@Moment  Weird isn’t it? It seems the deeper one gets into science, the more they can’t see the truth. Kinda baffling. (Not John, he totally gets it).