Santhiphap

Fear of losing myself

92 posts in this topic

4 minutes ago, Faceless said:

Precisely

And effort/volition -- this sense of doing, striving.  Completely flavoured by time, fear, and desire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, robdl said:

And effort/volition -- this sense of doing, striving.  Completely flavoured by time, fear, and desire.

The self(time) attempting to use time (movement of self) to end time. 

The ultimate contradiction indeed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Citing spiritual authority -- flavoured by:

knowledge (having accumulated their teaching),

fear (seeking security in their teaching)

time (using memory/the past to recall their teachings/knowledge)

self (I am a Buddhist/Christian and here's what my tradition says about it)

 

Therefore citing spiritual authority can quite easily be a movement of thought-self asserting/propagating.

Edited by robdl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Faceless said:

The self(time) attempting to use time (movement of self) to end time. 

The ultimate contradiction indeed. 

Or the self (desire) attempting to use desire (movement of self) to end desire.

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, robdl said:

Citing spiritual authority -- flavoured by:

knowledge (having accumulated their teaching),

fear (seeking security in their teaching)

time (using memory/the past to recall their teachings/knowledge)

 

Therefore citing spiritual authority can quite easily be a movement of thought-self asserting/propagating.

Yes. 

Any movement of conforimty to thought, (experience, knowledge, memory), is the same as clinging to the self/ego. 

The self seeks security in its own movement. But the self and it’s content (experience, knowledge, memory) is one and the same process of fear. 

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, robdl said:

Or the self (desire) attempting to use desire (movement of self) to end desire.

lol

Bingo lol 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duality is kind of  hilarious.  50 seemingly different ways that seem opposed, separate, unique, conflicting --- to speak of ONE AND THE SAME movement!

Edited by robdl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, robdl said:

Duality is kind of  hilarious.  50 seemingly different ways that seem opposed, separate, unique, conflicting --- to speak of ONE AND THE SAME movement!

The nature of thought loves to cut ‘things’ to pieces, and be totally blind to that very doing. 

Well said @robdl

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Faceless said:

The nature of thought loves to cut ‘things’ to pieces, and be totally blind to that very doing. 

Well said @robdl

 

 

Because it's in thought's very nature to thing-ify, make distinctions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an insight that is unitary, whole, and then thought seems to have the capacity to thing-ify it later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, robdl said:

Because it's in thought's very nature to thing-ify, make distinctions.

Thats it. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Arman said:

Has faceless found his soul-mate??? 

 

 


source: cook-greuter.com 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Arman said:

Has faceless found his soul-mate??? 

 

We're buying a timeshare together in Scottsdale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

broquet-meme.jpg


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, robdl said:

Citing spiritual authority -- flavoured by:

knowledge (having accumulated their teaching),

fear (seeking security in their teaching)

time (using memory/the past to recall their teachings/knowledge)

self (I am a Buddhist/Christian and here's what my tradition says about it)

 

Therefore citing spiritual authority can quite easily be a movement of thought-self asserting/propagating.

I'm the only one in the thread that cited a tradition. Was this directed to me? Was I suppose to comment?


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Anna1 said:

I'm the only one in the thread that cited a tradition. Was this directed to me? Was I suppose to comment?

Nah. This tendency is universal.  I've done it.

Edited by robdl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, robdl said:

Nah.

Good, cause I'm a little tired and not in the mood. xD You enjoy your non-teaching and I'll enjoy my teaching.  Lol


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, robdl said:

Nah. This tendency is universal.  I've done it.

Yes, the only way to learn is to see this actuality in ourselves. This is self learning/self reflection, to understand oneself. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now