Path to enlightenment don't have to be painful

[Leo Gura]

@now is forever Questioning will happen naturally when you are in the middle of the trip. But it's not the kind of "questioning" you're talking about. The "questioning" you're doing right now is a sort of fear-based skepticism. That's not true questioning. True questioning is totally open and curious. Fear of being wrong shouldn't be on your mind. It's the ego-mind which fears being wrong.

The psychedelic will reveal truth to you in an organic, effortless manner. You can doubt it afterwards if you like. If you try to apply fear-based skepticism in the middle of the trip, you are not surrendering, and you will likely have a bad trip. Psychedelics punish arrogance. And fear-based skepticism -- despite how it might seem to you -- is arrogance.

Sounds like your aversion to psychedelics is fear-based.

For me, stopping is not a problem or an issue. I have no attachment to psychedelics. I use them like a tool, in moderation.

[now is forever]

22 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

@now is forever Questioning will happen naturally when you are in the middle of the trip. But it's not the kind of "questioning" you're talking about. The "questioning" you're doing right now is a sort of fear-based skepticism. That's not true questioning. True questioning is totally open and curious. Fear of being wrong shouldn't be on your mind. It's the ego-mind which fears being wrong.

The psychedelic will reveal truth to you in an organic, effortless manner. You can doubt it afterwards if you like. If you try to apply fear-based skepticism in the middle of the trip, you are not surrendering, and you will likely have a bad trip. Psychedelics punish arrogance. And fear-based skepticism -- despite how it might seem to you -- is arrogance.

i don't see that the same way. because i didn't have fear taking them. i only questioned them afterwards - and i have no curiosity to take them again. i would even not stand in the way if i had children taking psychedelics, i maybe would even help them in finding good quality stuff. i would just tell them to be careful and that they should question doing them, so no it's not fear. it's compassion for others.

either way i would not tell them to take them, everyone has to decide that for themselves.

Edited June 9, 2018 by now is forever

[Leo Gura]

@now is forever Your experience with psychedelics was only the tip of the iceberg of what is there.

It's like you dipped your toe in the ocean, saw a shark, and ran away forever.

The ocean is still there to be explored.

If you don't want to explore it, that's fine.

[Solace]

And even monks and advanced yogis are not enlightened after a lifetime of practice. This is because they did not know about the spiritual heart, and how it is essential to connect there to become source! This is sooo important, beyond important.

Enlightenment this requires a lifestyle change. For me that is focusing on the rising and falling of my chest. I’m talking about the deepest enlightenment, not merely awakening.

Edited June 9, 2018 by Solace

[now is forever]

@Leo Gura group pressure is something  really massive, you understand your roll don't you?

don't want to moralize here, just want you to be careful. you are the center of this discussion.

Edited June 9, 2018 by now is forever

[Moreira]

37 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

@now is forever Your experience with psychedelics was only the tip of the iceberg of what is there.

It's like you dipped your toe in the ocean, saw a shark, and ran away forever.

The ocean is still there to be explored.

If you don't want to explore it, that's fine.

Elon Musk say's there are 90% posibilities that the reality we are living in is a simulation. did you saw that in your trips when you whitnesses the absolut? If yes,what is outside the simulation?

[now is forever]

1 hour ago, Moreira said:

Elon Musk say's there are 90% posibilities that the reality we are living in is a simulation. did you saw that in your trips when you whitnesses the absolut? If yes,what is outside the simulation?

i wonder who thought of simulating shitting and naked mules and cockroaches. it's just that we are building simulating machines that serve as models for our world how we perceive it. it showes a lack of direct experience of nature.

sorry for the ordinary words, but by constantly neglecting those things we forget something.

energy might have simulating foundations though. and so has what we perceive as matter.

you could say there are multiple steps of energy evolution. that build multiple layers of reality. and the mind receives what it is able to recive. did you ever wonder if everyone sees the same colours as you do?

if evolution = simulation, it's energy simulating itself no one behind it. and probably nothing outside of it.

but we might never know for sure.

so the question is kind of aggressive...as was mine ☺️

Edited June 9, 2018 by now is forever

[Crystalous]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

@now is forever Your experience with psychedelics was only the tip of the iceberg of what is there.

It's like you dipped your toe in the ocean, saw a shark, and ran away forever.

The ocean is still there to be explored.

If you don't want to explore it, that's fine.

It's not everything for everyone!

[pluto]

First of all.. everything is spiritual. Everyone, knowingly or unknowingly is here to ultimately wake up to their true self/Enlightenment without having the infinite intelligence available that is default in spirit/oneness.

Some people go through hell all their lives then have a spiritual awakening(never practicing modern so called "spirituality") and its all absolute bliss for them while others have illusory happy lives then find spirituality/truth then need to go through the truth they never saw and experience the darkness they never truly faced to reach Enlightenment.

Others already have before they got onto a "spiritual path"(so to speak) but one way or another, its always been a spiritual path.

We are not human beings having a spiritual experience, we are spiritual beings having a human experience.

Edited June 10, 2018 by pluto

[now is forever]

@pluto do you want to say that everything we experienced is true? or is it just true for us? i'm stil trying to figure that out...but it's like the ultimate question of everything - it seems there will never be an answer.

Edited June 10, 2018 by now is forever

[Nahm]

Skeptical or cynical is a worthwhile self inquiry & realization.  

Great thread. 

[SgtPepper]

I unconditionally accept Leo in his communication. Like another poster said, it felt like Leo was being honest and authentic about his experience. 

Leo's discussion about psychedelics is correct and it falls in line with my experience.

I think at the end of the day, we just gotta do our best for ourselves. We have techniques for raising consciousness like meditation, yoga, psychedelics... Everyone practice it as much as you can, if you don't get enlightened, it doesn't mean you won't find gems and peaks, about who we are. On a material level, who knows what this could mean for our genes and future generations potential to become enlightened. 

 

[Faceless]

@Joseph Maynor

What if there is really only one insight?

What if by us continuing in the direction of time (psychological becoming) we are preventing that one major insight that ends the movement of time altogether? 

What if the reason there are so many partial insights is because each of those insights is fragmented and a movement of duality? 

Could there be only One whole insight? 

What is insight? Is insight gained through the accumulation of knowledge, experience, memory? 

Something that may interest you buddy

Edited June 10, 2018 by Faceless

[Faceless]

2 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

What’s the insight?

Well if it was that easy communicating it i would be a lot more successful in sharing it lol 

But have you ever considered that before? 

Edited June 10, 2018 by Faceless

[Faceless]

Have you read many of my posts? 

[Faceless]

4 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You gotta give me one insight, that’s what you said, right.  Am I wrong?

I didn’t say I could give you an insight. Besides that implies duality. 

I just asked if you had considered that there may be one insight. And that insight may not be the result of anything within the field of knowledge, experience, memory. (Accumulation) 

No one can give you anything. You see that right?

Edited June 10, 2018 by Faceless

[Guest Quanty]

No physical/emotional pain during the path to Enlightenment ?

Who claims there is no pain is an amateur, an aspirant to awakening. 

[Faceless]

26 minutes ago, Faceless said:

@Joseph Maynor

What if there is really only one insight?

What if by us continuing in the direction of time (psychological becoming) we are preventing that one major insight that ends the movement of time altogether? 

What if the reason there are so many partial insights is because each of those insights is fragmented and a movement of duality? 

Could there be only One whole insight? 

What is insight? Is insight gained through the accumulation of knowledge, experience, memory? 

Something that may interest you buddy

I don’t understand why you are getting all defensive. 

Look at what I asked you originally 

[Faceless]

@Joseph Maynor

nobody can give/teach you this stuff. And We must explore without bias. 

I have simply offered some possible questions that may be valuable. Never know right. 

Edited June 10, 2018 by Faceless

[Solace]

Oh, there is pain... Depends on how fast you want to evolve