Everything that is possible for humans to do, we will always do?

[MarkusSweden]

Let us imagine a large range of all human behaviours that is possible, all possible deeds, thoughts, level of consciousness etcetera. 

In todays world that range of 'all-possibilities' is fully covered, we have humans from the highest to the lowest level of awareness.

Now, if we think of a better world, let's say in the future, where world is at peace and politicians speaks more truth for more altruistic reasons. And that certain deeds that humans use to do(commit) is absent. Hence a range that is more limited then the 'all-possibility-range' and cover all of the 'good', but not all of the 'bad'.  

In that new world, a somewhat more idealistic world, it would lack full coverage of all possible human behaviours. And is that really possible? 

Maybe we humans can't have a world where our full range of possible behaviours where all levels of consciousnesses and deeds are not represented?

The actuall range of human behaviours at any given time must be fully relaxed into complete coverage of the "all-possibility-range" 

Hence, politics will probably always be somewhat of a low conscious 'game' for example. 

If we can do good, we do! If we can do bad, we do. 

Humans as a whole will always do everything that is possible to do. The lowest level of consciousness will always be represented just because it is possible, and vice versa, the highest level of consciousness will also always be represented, simply because it's possible.

Hence the world can't be that much better of. A little bit better of course, we might live in a somewhat more peaceful world. But we can never shrink that range of actual human behaviours to be any less then the "all-possibility-range". It must be fully covered in the same what that consciousness must be infinite. 

Imagine filling a span with water, some of the volume in the span represent 'good' and some volume represent 'bad'. You can't fill that span in a way that only the 'good' volume parts are filled with water. All of the volume must be filled if you fill that span. 

There are a lots of fields in mathematics that says that if something can be 'relaxated', it will be, only constraints that is impossible to remove will sustain. Therefore a 'constraint' that cut off bad deeds and low consciousness behaviour will never sustain, since it's possible to break that constraint(relaxation).

I don't know why this is so interesting to me. I guess I want to know how accurate feelings of "saving the world" are, that many people held. 

What do you think? 

In a way, it's an endless battle between 'good' and 'evil' where both sides must be represented. Just make sure you pick the right side. At least not to far from the 'good' end.  

Edited June 5, 2018 by MarkusSweden