Rilles

How To Disidentify With The Voice

69 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, Faceless said:

@robdl

can you see that movement in your own experience?

It rings true personally, for sure. Now the mind goes, "indeed this is the case with fear, pleasure, and desire and how they interrelate, but what to do about it?"  Is it safe to say that there is nothing to do about it per se --- merely just to see it is sufficient?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, robdl said:

but what to do about it?

To do anything about it implies “positive action” 

 

The “i” that is separate from “it” is a movement of duality 

 

The “i” and “it” are one and the same movement. To take any action in accordance to that division inevitably leads to contradiction, and therefore confusion, conflict.

 

And any action taken by the self is a movement of will/volition “thought” and will only nourish and perpetuate that movement. 

33 minutes ago, robdl said:

Is it safe to say that there is nothing to do about it per se --- merely just to see it is sufficient?

Anything thought/self “the doer” does to “IT/thought/self” is a movement of volition/strife/duality/contradiction. This is positive action taken by thought/ego. 

 

 

To see/understand the whole of this is movement, “the nature, structure, and process of thought” is it’s own action of non-action. 

 

To negate all positive action of self/thought/duality/time, is the cessation of movement of thought/time. 

This is what is known as the ending of time. 

 

 It’s quite beautiful indeed

 

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this “ending of time becomes actual” then interesting things happen. 

 

Experience “memory” ceases to be carried over onto the present moment and there is an experiencing without the experiencer at all. 

 

Otherwise known as centerlessness. 

 

This is the timeless

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Faceless said:

To do anything about it implies “positive action” 

 

The “i” that is separate from “it” is a movement of duality 

 

The “i” and “it” are one and the same movement. To take any action in accordance to that division inevitably leads to contradiction, and therefore confusion, conflict.

 

And any action taken by the self is a movement of will/volition “thought” and will only nourish and perpetuate that movement. 

Anything thought/self “the doer” does to “IT/thought/self” is a movement of volition/strife/duality/contradiction. This is positive action taken by thought/ego. 

 

 

To see/understand the whole of this is movement, “the nature, structure, and process of thought” is it’s own action of non-action. 

 

To negate all positive action of self/thought/duality/time, is the cessation of movement of thought/time. 

This is what is known as the ending of time. 

 

 It’s quite beautiful indeed

 

This is some of the most cogent teaching I've ever come across.  Much appreciated. 

I hope people aren't skipping by these gems you're dropping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, robdl said:

Much appreciated. 

??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, robdl said:

This is some of the most cogent teaching I've ever come across.  Much appreciated. 

I hope people aren't skipping by these gems you're dropping.

I'll have to agree! I read it carefully just because your comment! 

This is some of the greatest stuff I have yet come across at this forum

Pure gold. 


Isn't it so, yes or no? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now