hope

[GomeGabrielDavid]

location infinitely tiny (example: infinite locations within circle) motion require distance infinite instantly

.

Edited March 28, 2018 by GomeGabrielDavid

[deci belle]

hi Gabriel~

Without engaging any sort of philosophically recreational speculation…

If inconceivability is non-originated, and awake; void of inside, void of outside, void of voidness: how is there motion or stillness?

Having no location, inside or outside, the locus is whole, complete, perfect. How is there "surface"?

Particulars are either a self-reference or ineffable. Knowing has no self. Knowing has no origin. How could there be "location"?

"There is no thing" isn't a manifesto of nihilism~ it's the nature of non-dual Reality in the midst of delusional existence. It's "who knows". Neither noumenon or particular are harmed. This is itself awake. No-thing is awake, is what is awake, is your own mind right now. Just this is "who". Who is knowing, is the same as knowing; there is no "who" that partakes of knowing. Knowledge of particulars is relativity; "who" is not relative.

Perception itself has no relative aspect. Awake is. There is no reason why. Nobody knows. Our nature is simply and selflessly "awake".

Who knows, there being no knower, known or liver of life?

Who knows?

To talk about if (anything)… is that something else altogether?

 

[deci belle]

Well, Gabriel…

Instead of changing your OP's title and content, why not just continue the thread as posed, and work with that?

Are you some sort of recreational philosopher looking for wiggle room?

There is not even nothing in the circle. There is no room, surface, space, location— much less hope.

Floating around in the center of the compass is itself the center which has no location. This is the center.

Its point of illumination is "who". The circle has no "where".

As for who, the one who requires proof~ who might that be, Gabriel— since you mention it?

In terms of your OP, what is it?

Quote

If you require proof, will you understand anything is possible?

As for your last line, is that to mean that doubt is commensurate with belief? If so, I'll go along with that much.

 

ed note: add "— much less hope." in the 3rd line; add last line and quote

 

Edited March 28, 2018 by deci belle

[deci belle]

It seems mr GomeGabrielDa…'s "who," cut and run (after further deconstructing his OP to the point of packing up and leaving town on a rail).

To quote Don Juan Matus (again), "Ego is such a prick, it would rather kill itself ."

 

 

ed note: remove one redundant "further" in first line

Edited March 28, 2018 by deci belle