Faceless

The beauty of a mind a mind that has no problems and therefore no experience.

12 posts in this topic

 The moment you have an experience and hold onto it then that becomes memory. Then that memory is chased and longed for to become experienced again and again. Then arises pleasure and where there is pleasure there is fear and pain, ‘problems’ 

 

 As long as there is a center ‘the self’ there must be problems.. as long as there is a movement that i must be enlightened, become a spiritual success, develop a quiet mind, conflict is inevitable. Conflict arises in the ‘i’ who must become or the ‘i’ who must not do this or that. 

 

 The center is the essence of inattention. When there is total attention there is no center. The moment the ‘u’ creeps in there is inattention. And the center with its inattention creates all psychological problems.

 

A mind free of problems/experiences is an art. This is the art of living.

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Faceless said:

A mind free of problems/experiences is an art. This is the art of living.

Funny how death leads to it :)
You need to die in order to live and see the cycle. A positive feedback loop. Completely counter-intuitive.


Bearing with the conditioned in gentleness, fording the river with resolution, not neglecting what is distant, not regarding one's companions; thus one may manage to walk in the middle. H11L2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Faceless  Isn't the problem being described the exclusive self-identity's segregated subject/object relationship with experience? Whereas, in truth, consciousness and experience are not-two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, tsuki said:

Funny how death leads to it :)
You need to die in order to live and see the cycle. A positive feedback loop. Completely counter-intuitive.

?good call 

Die every minute to live every minute. A constant process of dying is a constant process of living. To live in the dynamic ‘present moment’, the static ‘accumulation of the self and it’s content or the past’, must end. Otherwise the past is imposed on the present moment. That which is old, dead, ‘experience’ becomes an impression onto each moment which is alive and active and therefore projections manifest from that. Therefore one is never free from recognition. So nothing is new or there is never a sense of creativity....This is the prison of memory, knowledge, and experience. 

This is why I think most people say they can’t live in the present. I would say this is the root of all psychological problems. 

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, snowleopard said:

@Faceless  Isn't the problem being described the exclusive self-identity's segregated subject/object relationship with experience? Whereas, in truth, consciousness and experience are not-two.

I would say they are the same. Yeah fragmentation, segmentation, create the confusion, contradiction, conflict. When we look at ourselves the subject is the object. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, snowleopard said:

@Faceless  Isn't the problem being described the exclusive self-identity's segregated subject/object relationship with experience? Whereas, in truth, consciousness and experience are not-two.

Consciousness and experience are not two. 

Do you think there are strict "laws" to consciousness, or do you thing anything is possible. If you saw a man breaking the laws of "physics" and fly over your head, would you be surprised?

Or if you were able to levitate just because you want to, how surprising would that be to you, giving your understanding? 

 

Edited by MarkusSweden

Isn't it so, yes or no? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MarkusSweden said:

Consciousness and experience are not two. 

Do you thing there are strict "laws" to consciousness, or do you thing anything is possible. If you saw a man breaking the laws of "physics" and fly over your head, would you be surprised? Or if you were able to levitate just because you want to, how surprising would that be to you, giving your understanding? 

 

Your consciousness is composed of memory, knowledge, experience. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The self ‘thought’ and it’s consciousness is the accumulation of memory, knowledge, and experience/experiences...

when that is emptied only then is the mind/consciousness free

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go into it for yourselves... this is freedom

Edited by Faceless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MarkusSweden said:

Or if you were able to levitate just because you want to, how surprising would that be to you

If I were in the space-station, then not very surprising at all. ;) But again, the 'laws' of nature need not be incompatible with explaining phenomenal events in terms of the primacy of consciousness. So within a given rule-set, phenomena would still have to conform to those conditions.  However, I've witnessed poltergeist phenomena, wherein objects apparently defied gravity, and were somehow propelled off a table, with no physical causation. This would just be one example of how science freed from the confines of materialism could be used to explore such paranormal events.

Edited by snowleopard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now