This Painting BROKE Donald Trump. Let’s Take A Look.

[Nilsi]

lol

That’s how you actually undermine tyrannical power, if you ask me. Not by dehumanizing - that just makes you part of the same mess.

You go for creative trolling, smart subversion, and hitting where it actually stings. 

Whoever made this painting is my personal hero.

Edited Saturday at 07:42 PM by Nilsi

[Leo Gura]

Gotta be honest, that's a bad painter. Baby-face Trump.

If he working in the times of kings he would have lost his head.

Edited Sunday at 06:04 AM by Leo Gura

[OBEler]

@Leo Gura the bad painter did it probably on purpose.

He really looks like a moron here.

[Jannes]

Purposefully not validating Trumps ego is a very interesting strategy indeed. I think Trump would have wanted to look more masculine and powerful.

Here is the picture of Barack btw. It also doesnt look empowering to me as well. The artists name is Sarah Boardman.

 

Edited Sunday at 03:03 PM by Jannes

[Leo Gura]

Haha, it's so bad.

This girl definitely getting replaced with AI.

[Basman]

48 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Haha, it's so bad.

This girl definitely getting replaced with AI.

That poor girl's feelings...

[OBEler]

@Jannes ok I have thrown my theory away. This womans style is not so good.

[Schizophonia]

37 minutes ago, OBEler said:

@Jannes ok I have thrown my theory away. This womans style is not so good.

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

Haha, it's so bad.

This girl definitely getting replaced with AI.

You are brainroted; These paintings are very good.

Edited Sunday at 04:32 PM by Schizophonia

[Jannes]

19 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

You are brainroted; These paintings are very good.

They are on a very high technical level but thats not what art is about.

[Eskilon]

6 minutes ago, Jannes said:

thats not what art is about

But it is, art is both the technical and the imaginative.

People mocking the girl but I wouldnt call this bad art.

Edited Sunday at 05:00 PM by Eskilon

[Jannes]

22 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

But it is, art is both the technical and the imaginative.

People mocking the girl but I wouldnt call this bad art.

Well I think the technical skill is nessecary to be able to express creative ideas, but the heart of art is creativity and catching important parts of reality and expressing them through the art piece.

Like a mathematician needs to be able to draw numbers and signs but thats not at the heart of math at all.

[Jannes]

Trump looks like an altruistic INFP and Obama like an incompetent baby ffs.

I looked at some other paintings of her to get a feeling for her work. None of her pictures depict anyone as strong, most portrays show the inner struggle, fragility, their longing and neurosis in my interpretation. With the exception of a picture of herself. 

https://www.sarahaboardman.com/collections/40403

Edited Sunday at 05:53 PM by Jannes

[Lyubov]

Crazy what has been normalized in the past 8 years, this guy complaining about his portrait… USA is a madhouse. 

[Eskilon]

29 minutes ago, Jannes said:

Well I think the technical skill is nessecary to be able to express creative ideas, but the heart of art is creativity and catching important parts of reality and expressing them through the art piece.

Like a mathematician needs to be able to draw numbers and signs but thats not at the heart of math at all.

Well, creativity is intelligence, to be able to imagine you need intelligence.

Some arts are more technical than others but you always need technique, can't have anything without technique.

The point is, that technique is art too and it not less fundamental than imagination because the two are inseparable to be able to do art. 

Edited Sunday at 05:56 PM by Eskilon