Great awakening (another mass deception)

[Adrian colby]

Watching things unfold over the last few years within the spiritual community I noticed an infiltration of bizarre ideology. I’ve been trying to protect my retreats from it and I seem to be getting through to most wayward clients and guiding them back to introspection . There are some who are so blinded by their rage, there’s no getting through to them. I decided to sit down and write an essay I might do an audio recording of. I’d be grateful for feedback and constructive criticism. 

-edit- audio file now up for listening

The Great Awakening: The Rise of Conspirituality

In the past eight years, a narrative known as “The Great Awakening" has taken root, presenting itself as a collective spiritual ascension. The movement quickly gained traction within New Age circles and spiritual communities, as many seekers latched onto it as evidence of a global shift in consciousness.

However, the origins of this movement were not spiritual. It did not emerge from deep introspection, self-inquiry, or authentic personal transformation. Instead, it arose from conspiracy narratives, political manipulation, and a reactionary response to global instability. It created a new category of ideology now known as “conspirituality”. A new religion.

 

During this period, the Great Awakening movement became intertwined with conspiracy theories, particularly those surrounding:

COVID-19 and mass vaccination (The belief that an elite-controlled oligarchy was using the pandemic to enforce population control.)
The "Satanic elite" narrative (Accusations that global leaders, billionaires, and institutions were engaged in child trafficking, ritual abuse, and demonic worship.)
The demonisation of progressivism (A reactionary push against cultural and political shifts, reframed as a "battle of good vs. evil.”)

 

This movement capitalised on the fears of vulnerable individuals, particularly those already disillusioned with institutions. Donald Trump and his allies deliberately mobilised this demographic, using psychological tactics to target specific audiences via social media. He hired a Company called Cambridge Analytica prior to the 2016 election  to identify an audience that could be easily manipulated. this company was quickly dissolved after the election was won. Troll farms (allegedly Russian) were used to infiltrate religious and spiritual groups to spread misinformation and manipulate the communities by preying on a believers tendency to emotional reaction instead of critical thinking.turning them against political opponents, societal minorities and anyone who could be utilised to induce fear, anger hatred to be perceived as an enemy.

 

A significant portion of the demographic targeted by the rise of conspirituality comes from marginalised, economically disadvantaged, and socially stigmatised backgrounds. Many of these individuals have faced poverty, lack of education, and limited access to opportunities, leaving them feeling disenfranchised and unheard. The psychological effects of chronic instability, generational trauma, and systemic neglect create an environment where victim mentality becomes a deeply ingrained survival mechanism. These individuals are not just lacking material wealth (they have also been deprived of the critical thinking skills, self-worth, and psychological stability needed to break free from disempowering narratives.) Historically, such groups have been easy prey for religious institutions, charismatic leaders, and ideological movements that offer them a sense of belonging, moral clarity, and purpose. When exposed to conspiratorial and pseudo-spiritual narratives, they become particularly susceptible(not necessarily because they are unintelligent, but because their distrust of authority, compounded with a desperate need for meaning, makes them seek refuge in belief systems that validate their suffering. These movements provide them with a sense of identity and community, often offering simplistic answers to complex systemic issues. Rather than addressing their internalised victimhood and disempowerment, they are encouraged to see themselves as warriors in a larger battle against unseen forces, whether that be the government, science, global elites, or even abstract spiritual enemies like “Satanic forces.” This reinforces their mind traps, further entrenching them in a belief system that gives them comfort but ultimately keeps them disempowered. and its not just contained to this demographic. as a movement like this takes hold and builds momentum, individuals from all classes, achedemia and governance, jump on board whether the narrative supports their pre conceived beliefs or if they simply succumb to a herd mentality. but as a movement like this is not based on solid foundation it begins to consume itself and ultimately falls apart under its own corruption.

 

How It Started

Two key players stand out in the rise of the current Great Awakening conspiracy, though many other factors contributed to its development. This is not the first time in history that a "Great Awakening" has been proclaimed. From the mid-1700s to the early 20th century, various Great Awakenings emerged, each attempting to reshape society through moral absolutism and all of them based in religious dogma.

While these movements led to some positive reforms such as the abolition of slavery and greater calls for equality, they ultimately failed because moral absolutism does not work in complex societies. Instead of addressing the root causes of social issues, they demonised the symptoms, leading to increased crime, social unrest, and forcing morality through law without understanding human behaviour leading to unintended consequences.

This pattern has reemerged in the digital age, where movements like QAnon and the Cult of Kek have revived the same black-and-white moral narratives but adapted them to the internet age, using memetic warfare, online radicalisation, and conspiracy rhetoric to spread their ideology.

 

The "Cult of Kek" emerged on the dark web forum 4CHAN in 2015, a notorious breeding ground for alt-right extremism, fascism, and bigotry. Originally, “Kek” was a slang term used as an alternative to “LOL”, but it soon took on a deeper, symbolic meaning. Users discovered that Kek was also the name of an Egyptian frog god associated with chaos and darkness, which they ironically embraced as a representation of their movement.

During Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, this frog-god symbolism was fused with Trump’s persona, portraying him as a chaotic saviour destined to dismantle the establishment and usher in a resurgence of alt-right ideology. This online subculture developed a loosely organised occult-style psychological operation, using memes, digital propaganda, and absurdist humour to shape belief narratives and manipulate public discourse. The internet meme Pepe the Frog, originally an innocent cartoon, was co-opted into this movement as a powerful sigil of “meme magic”, a concept rooted in the belief that repeated symbols and ideas can manifest reality.

While the Cult of Kek was a chaotic, decentralised internet movement, it laid the groundwork for an even more organised belief system: QAnon. In 2017, an anonymous figure known as “Q” appeared on 4CHAN, spinning an elaborate conspiracy narrative that co-opted the language of awakening, spiritual transformation, and divine battle, all in service of pushing a right-wing authoritarian agenda.

What many fail to recognise is that this entire movement (Kek-QAnon-Trumpism) was never a grassroots spiritual awakening. It was, and remains, a political and psychological power grab, disguised as divine revelation. In fact, it is the very epitome of "false light" (a deception masquerading as spiritual enlightenment.)

The greatest irony is that the very people claiming to fight against "demonic forces" are, in practice, using the exact same techniques they denounce. A traditional Christian group would never engage in sigil work, "meme magic," or occult symbolism (as they would consider such practices inherently demonic) And yet, this movement openly embraced these methods while weaponising religious fear against their perceived enemies. This begs the question of who they really are.

Ultimately, the Cult of Kek, QAnon, and Trump are not a battle against darkness—they are an extension of it, using the very tools of manipulation they claim to be resisting.

 

What Went Wrong? How Did This Happen?

as of 2025 an alt-right authoritarian presence dominates America and the global geopolitical landscape, many former Trump voters are experiencing disillusionment. The very policies they voted for—believing they would restore economic stability, traditional values, or "freedom"—are now directly harming them, leaving many regretting their decision.

For those from the spiritual community that followed believing they were participating in a Great spiritual awakening…

What happened? How did so many get swept into a movement that promised liberation but delivered oppression? The answer lies in a fundamental misunderstanding of spirituality, consciousness, and the mechanisms of belief.

 

The Pre/Trans Fallacy and the Danger of Misinterpreted Spirituality

At the heart of this phenomenon is the "Pre/Trans Fallacy," a concept developed by Ken Wilber. This fallacy occurs when pre-rational belief systems (rooted in superstition, emotion, and blind faith) are mistaken for trans-rational wisdom (genuine spiritual insight that transcends and includes rationality).

This means that:

People who have not yet developed critical thinking, scientific reasoning, or rational self-inquiry, Mistake their emotional reactions, gut feelings, and conspiracy-driven beliefs for higher spiritual insight.

This is not a progress toward enlightenment—it’s regression.

spiritual awakening is not about clinging to external beliefs but about dismantling one’s conditioned mind and experiencing direct awareness beyond ideology. However, when belief-based individuals misunderstand metaphorical spiritual concepts, they project those symbols onto external enemies, repeating a pattern that religious institutions have used for centuries to maintain control.

This critical confusion has allowed authoritarian figures, conspiracy movements, and manipulative leaders to hijack spirituality itself—turning what should be a path to freedom into a tool for oppression and control. It has slowly infiltrated into the new age, plant medicine, personal development and spiritual community.

 

Esoteric Truths vs. Exoteric Corruptions

The irony of the Great Awakening movement is that everything it demonises (esoteric teachings, ancient wisdom, occult traditions) is the foundation of its own religious roots.

Ancient mystery schools, Hermeticism, and Platonic, buddhist, taoist, vedantic traditions were centred on deep self-inquiry and the understanding of consciousness.
This wisdom was later encoded into metaphorical spiritual texts but misunderstood by later followers, leading to the formation of rigid dogma, misinterpretation, and power-seeking institutions.

Religions were originally symbolic representations of deeper truths, but over time, people mistook the symbols for literal reality.  That is to put it another way, that trying to describe an ineffable experience from outside reality using metaphors and analogies from within known reality are not meant to be interpreted literally!

Rather than turning inward and getting to know the functions, processes and mechanisms of their own minds,  followers projected spiritual struggles outward onto demons, devils, and external enemies.(ironically demons, devils, angels and gods are all symbology for different facets and levels of the mind, consciousness and awareness. not actual literal objective entities)

This is exactly what we see happening today with conspiratorial narratives co-opting spirituality.

The "Satanic elite" narrative is a modern version of the medieval witch hunts
The "global cabal" is a recycled anti-Semitic trope from centuries past
The fight against "woke ideology" is a refusal to embrace an evolving, more nuanced worldview

The entire movement isn’t about spiritual awakening—it’s a desperate attempt by those stuck in lower stages of development to cling to an outdated worldview because change, growth and understanding threatens their very identity as a person.

 

What we are seeing now is not a great awakening, but an egoic backlash against the natural progression of human consciousness.

The world is evolving toward inclusivity, diversity, and a more fluid, interconnected understanding of reality.
Those stuck in rigid belief structures and black-and-white thinking feel threatened by this shift.

Their reaction? A violent, fear-based resistance, misinterpreted as a spiritual battle.

This is not about left vs. right, science vs. religion, or tradition vs. progress. It is about awareness in contrast to unconscious reaction. The ascension is about going from unconscious conditioned reaction to conscious aware  and thoughtful response. This requires stepping outside the confines of a conditioned mind and gaining some recognition and mastery over it.

Those who refuse to examine their own beliefs and subconscious fears are ripe for manipulation. They become tools for political agendas, religious fundamentalism, and regressive ideologies (all while believing they are "free thinkers" and "awakened souls.”) nothing could be further from the truth and the best way to spot them is their emotional reaction particularly fear and anger. Its also not just about the pre/trans fallacy.

While individuals exist at varying stages of cognitive, social, cultural, and spiritual development, there has also been a breakdown in how spiritual truths are taught and realised. Including the reasons why people seek out spirituality in the first place.

 

Are Secret Societies Evil for Hiding Spiritual Truths?

Many assume that esoteric spiritual wisdom has been deliberately hidden out of elitism or control. However, the mystery schools safeguarded these teachings for a reason—much like how medical students are not immediately allowed to practice without extensive training. You wouldn’t let an unqualified individual perform surgery, and the same applies to higher spiritual knowledge. Not everyone is ready, nor does everyone have a genuine interest in understanding these truths beyond their own biases and desires for validation.

Initiates of advanced spiritual knowledge were not exposed to such ideas until they had undergone deep psychological purification, developed mental stability, and demonstrated mastery over their own mind. Without this groundwork, exposure to existential spiritual truths can lead to existential terror, psychosis, or delusional belief. Simply listening to spiritual teachings does not equate to understandingthem, and those who attempt to force profound realisations onto themselves or others often end up distorting the message entirely.

The foundational truth of spirituality is that consciousness is fundamental, and the experienced reality is a product of an infinite mind—a dream of sorts. A person’s perception of reality is not objective but filtered through their mind’s mechanisms. If their mind is primarily subconscious, conditioned, and reactionary, they are unaware of how their own thoughts and emotions shape their experience. Being exposed to spiritual truths without first mastering one's own mind can lead to complete misunderstanding or even psychological harm.

 

The Modern Spiritual Crisis: Healing vs. Belief Attachment

Most people do not enter spirituality through truth-seeking. They enter it searching for healing, purpose, or meaning because they are in pain, lost, or disillusioned. Rather than using spirituality to transcend their mind, they use it to reinforce their existing mental structures—attaching to new beliefs, identities, and ideological battles rather than dismantling them. This is why modern spirituality is filled with individuals clinging to conspiratorial thinking, manifestation culture, and spiritual bypassing, mistaking these distractions for genuine awakening.

Real awakening does not reinforce identity—it dissolves it. However, many people turn spirituality into another ideological safety net rather than a means of deep transformation. This is why advanced spirituality can be dangerous for an unprepared mind. A person still carrying emotional wounds and unresolved trauma will only experience existential truths as either profound terror or a fragile new belief to defend at all costs.

Historically, mysticism was reserved for those who had already undergone self-refinement. The mystery schools weren’t gatekeeping knowledge out of greed or elitism—they were safeguarding people from themselves. In contrast, the modern world has completely broken this structure. People are thrown into psychedelic awakenings before they’ve done any groundwork, latch onto spiritual ideas without deconstructing their own biases, and mistake intellectual concepts for direct experience. Worse, they become militant about their newfound beliefs—failing to realise they’ve merely swapped one illusion for another.

 

The Path Forward: From Psychological Stability to True Awakening

Rather than exposing unprepared individuals to higher spiritual truths, I shifted my focus to foundational mental and emotional work. Before anyone can truly awaken, they first need psychological stability. They must recognise how their mind was shaped, identify their emotional reactions, and understand that they are trapped in a self-created feedback loop.

A Structured Approach to Awakening:

Compassionate Inquiry → Tracing trauma and emotional conditioning back to their origins. 

Mental Deconstruction → Understanding how the mind constructs reality and identifying conditioned patterns. 

Dissolving & Reprogramming → Breaking automatic responses and self-imposed limitations. 

Creation & Expansion → Learning to consciously work with awareness rather than being blown like a leaf in the wind. 

Complete Awakening → Dissolving all attachment and becoming lucid within the dream of existence.

Each step builds upon the last. Skipping steps leads to delusion. Most people want enlightenment without self-inquiry, awakening without psychological stability, and ego death without understanding what the ego even is. But awakening isn’t something you believe in—it happens when belief itself dissolves.

 

The American "Great Awakening" Is Not Spiritual Awakening

What is happening in America and the broader global conspiratorial movement is not a Great Awakening—it is a collective distraction. A true awakening is the turning inward of awareness to awaken from the dream of narratives and illusions. The so-called "American Great Awakening" is the opposite—it is an obsession with external enemies, fabricated stories, and ideological warfare.

If you find yourself caught in this movement, it is not too late to step back and question:

What drew me to spirituality in the first place? Was I looking for healing and understanding, or did I get lost in narratives?

Have I been distracted by conspiracies and external enemies instead of facing myself?

Am I truly seeking truth, or am I just looking for something new to believe in to justify how I already am?

You don’t need to be “healing” forever. You don’t need to form an identity around spirituality. Spirituality was never meant to be a belief system—it was always meant to be about direct experience and awareness.

If you came to spirituality because you were suffering, go back to that original moment. Before you got caught in conspiracies, past lives, crystals, spells, aliens, and endless mental distractions—what were you really looking for?

That’s where you need to return. That’s where the real path begins.

If you are still fighting, demonising, and labelling others as evil, you are not awakened—you are trapped in duality.

 

Are we lost in the current situation?

If more people operated from genuine awareness rather than reactionary belief systems, our entire social and spiritual landscape would look radically different. We wouldn’t see power structures built on fear, division, and ignorance—we would cultivate systems that enhance consciousness, self-awareness, and authentic exploration of reality.

However, right now, we are witnessing the last desperate gasps of fear-based control systems clinging to existence. Those who see the larger pattern often feel isolated, disconnected, or frustrated by the world around them. It’s like being lucid in a dream while everyone else remains convinced the illusion is real.

The worst part? Many of those still trapped in their conditioned mind structures believe they are the ones who are “awake.”

But there is hope. The fact that I can see and name these patterns means that the shift is already in progress. Human consciousness is evolving. The backlash is strong, but it only happens because the shift is working. The old world wouldn’t be screaming so loudly if it weren’t losing its grip.

A true Great Awakening does not involve external battles—it is the quiet, profound realisation that everything, including the illusion itself, is part of the same consciousness. The way forward is not found in more stories but in transcending the need for stories altogether. When belief falls away, awareness remains.

 

Edited Thursday at 10:01 PM by Adrian colby
Audio version added

[Rafael Thundercat]

Great topic I see it.

[Lyubov]

interesting read, I agree with much of what you wrote. 

[aurum]

@Adrian colby great write up.

 

[Joshe]

17 hours ago, Adrian colby said:

But there is hope. The fact that I can see and name these patterns means that the shift is already in progress. Human consciousness is evolving. The backlash is strong, but it only happens because the shift is working. The old world wouldn’t be screaming so loudly if it weren’t losing its grip.

This is good to keep in mind.

On the whole, really nice work. Thank you!

[Nilsi]

It’s ironic how this concecpt of the "Great Awakening" has done a full 180.

As far as I’m aware, it was originally coined by Alexander Dugin in the context of his arcane philosophical project as a reaction against object-oriented ontology (OOO) - an obscure Western academic trend obsessed with post-humanism and the primacy of the object (mostly AI, synthetic biology, and other radical non-human actants, as Bruno Latour calls them). For Dugin, this technological accelerationism was an imminent civilzational thread to Russia and had to be countered by a return to tradition, which, in his view, was the only way the subject could survive the future rather than be dissolved into a flat, object-oriented world.

And yet, through some strange alchemy of Silicon Valley, QAnon and MAGA, the term has now been co-opted to mean precisely the opposite - often invoked in service of hyper-acceleration, techno-capitalist inevitability, or reactionary digital politics. So much for American and Russian agendas aligning, by the way.

Edited Thursday at 08:49 PM by Nilsi

[Rafael Thundercat]

21 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

And yet, through some strange alchemy of Silicon Valley, QAnon and MAGA, the term has now been co-opted to mean precisely the opposite - often invoked in service of hyper-acceleration, techno-capitalist inevitability, or reactionary digital politics. So much for American and Russian agendas aligning, by the way.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2025/jan/29/silicon-valley-rightwing-technofascism

 

[Loving Radiance]

@Adrian colby Amazing share ✨️ I didn't think I could contribute any criticism so I asked ChatGPT. I agree with points 1, 2, 3, and 5, and it lets me reflect how I am seeing things unholistic:

 

This essay presents a well-structured critique of conspirituality and the so-called “Great Awakening,” but it has several blind spots that weaken its argument. Here are the key areas that need more scrutiny:

1. Oversimplification of the Demographics Involved

The essay correctly identifies that marginalised and disillusioned individuals are particularly vulnerable to conspiracy movements, but it implies that their participation is largely due to a lack of education, critical thinking skills, and psychological stability. This overlooks the fact that many educated, middle-class, and even elite individuals have also been drawn into conspirituality. Intellectuals, doctors, and entrepreneurs have embraced these narratives, sometimes due to cognitive biases rather than pure ignorance. A deeper exploration of why educated individuals fall into these traps would strengthen the argument.

2. Reduction of Conspirituality to Psychological Deficiencies

The essay heavily focuses on trauma, victim mentality, and a lack of psychological stability as key reasons why people embrace conspiracy-based spirituality. While these are contributing factors, it overlooks the larger existential crisis that modernity has created. The rapid technological, cultural, and economic changes in the world have destabilized traditional meaning structures, leaving people grasping for certainty. Many turn to conspirituality not just because of trauma but because they seek coherence in a chaotic world. This broader sociological perspective is missing.

3. Dismissing Political and Economic Factors Too Quickly

Although the essay acknowledges political manipulation, it primarily attributes the rise of conspirituality to psychological and cognitive failings. However, many conspiritualists are responding to real issues—corporate overreach, governmental corruption, media manipulation, and global inequality. While their interpretations may be misguided, their underlying concerns are often valid. By failing to recognize this, the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

4. Lack of Self-Reflection on the Writer’s Own Biases

The essay presents itself as a neutral, enlightened perspective but does not acknowledge its own position within the spectrum of spiritual discourse. While critiquing dualistic thinking, it subtly engages in it by positioning conspirituality as purely misguided while portraying its own structured awakening model as the correct path. A more balanced approach would acknowledge that all perspectives, including the writer’s own, are filtered through subjective experience.

5. No Concrete Solutions Beyond Individual Awakening

The essay’s proposed solution is personal awakening through self-inquiry, mental deconstruction, and dissolving conditioned beliefs. While this is valuable, it does not address the larger systemic forces that contribute to conspirituality—economic instability, media propaganda, the role of social media algorithms, and the decline of traditional community structures. Without addressing these, individual transformation alone is unlikely to dismantle these movements on a large scale.

6. Overemphasis on “Transcending Belief” Without Acknowledging the Role of Belief

While the essay emphasizes dissolving belief systems, it does not fully explore the human need for belief and meaning. Even those who claim to transcend belief still operate within mental models and narratives. A more nuanced approach would recognize that belief itself is not the problem—it’s unexamined belief that leads to manipulation.

Conclusion

The essay provides a strong critique of the Great Awakening movement but falls into the trap of reducing complex phenomena to psychological deficiencies rather than addressing the broader sociopolitical and existential factors at play. A more holistic approach would integrate perspectives from sociology, philosophy, and political theory, rather than relying primarily on spiritual psychology.

[Adrian colby]

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said:

@Adrian colby Amazing share ✨️ I didn't think I could contribute any criticism so I asked ChatGPT. I agree with points 1, 2, 3, and 5, and it lets me reflect how I am seeing things unholistic:

 

This essay presents a well-structured critique of conspirituality and the so-called “Great Awakening,” but it has several blind spots that weaken its argument. Here are the key areas that need more scrutiny:

1. Oversimplification of the Demographics Involved

Wow, I think chat gpt misinterpreted the end of that paragraph. I notice that it tends to make mistakes when it interprets the context in which the words are used. I did indeed mention that the issue extends to educated people, people in governance and other classes so it wasn’t oversimplified there. I didn’t elaborate on various aspects throughout the piece to try and keep it to a 20 minute read but that most of those issues are mentioned. 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said:

 2. Reduction of Conspirituality to Psychological Deficiencies

Many turn to conspirituality not just because of trauma but because they seek coherence in a chaotic world. This broader sociological perspective is missing.

The sociological perspective is implied throughout the piece in various sections:

“Disillusioned with institutions”,

“reactionary response to global instability”, 

“economic stability, traditional values and freedom”

it would probably be beneficial to add technology alright! as in social media and its impact but it wasn’t necessary to make the point. 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said:

3. Dismissing Political and Economic Factors Too Quickly

again all the factors mentioned by gpt were mentioned. I do agree that there are real issues that are misinterpreted but that’s why the later part is concerned with introspection and discernment. 
I would also argue that a beings psychological and cognitive abilities are their filters for experiencing their reality beyond just awareness. The filters are where meaning is derived and if that is not working then everyone would only be dealing with interpretations and not the underlying reality. The point is trying to pull people back to ‘awareness’

 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said: the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

 

I’ve had concerns about this and I’ve seen allot of hate and frustration towards maga people appearing on social media. I’ve tried convincing some ‘rant’ writers not to stoop their level but to try compassion and understanding as to why they are that way instead. People don’t respond well to a barrage of hate or judgment. They do need a bit of a gentler approach cause they are thin skinned. 
I was stuck in the movement early on around 2019 so I can see the real issues they are concerned about. It’s just that they started targeting things I was directly involved in so I knew the truth of it. I very quickly saw through the delusions from that point on and the whole idea of the movement fell appart for me. 

 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said: the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

4. Lack of Self-Reflection on the Writer’s Own Biases

I won’t argue with that as everyone has a bias in order to hold a perspective to make a point. In order to see it though it requires holding multiple perspectives which ive been doing these past few years otherwise flicking from one side to another, experiencing the contrast, the issue wouldn’t have come to my attention. The point of the piece is not that there is a right or wrong ‘way’ or ‘path’ but rather spirituality and awakening states are about cultivating awareness not beleif. I’m not entirely sure gpt has the insight to spot that although my own interactions with it have been quite positive. 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said: the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

5. No Concrete Solutions Beyond Individual Awakening

the essay is addressing spiritual seekers not random populations. 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said: the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

6. Overemphasis on “Transcending Belief” Without Acknowledging the Role of Belief

of course gpt would make this mistake. Transcending beleif also includes the use of beleif as a tool rather than an identity attachment. Transcendence is a recognition and integration of all prior factors in the processes of the mind ( just like the trans/rational fallacy mention where the trans rational also includes the understanding and implementation of prior stages) . I also mentioned not teaching advanced spirituality as in the workings of the mind of god ( beleif being a tool to hold the reality in coherence). As stated already a lot of people are falling into spirituality as a result of overwhelming struggle so the psychology needs to be addressed and stabilised first before throwing gods psychology at them on top of it. If a creator being is at the whims of its beleifs instead of creatively intending to use its beleifs to manifest reality, you end up with a chaotic hellscape. Just like the astral ( just what I refers to a vivid dream or altered state) if you are quite fear prone, your thoughts instantly form that way and you end up essentially running away and screaming at yourself. When you practice being more balanced, the experience of those states of consciousness become more pleasant and meaningful. Why dreams are great teachers to check on one’s own mind state. 

9 hours ago, Loving Radiance said: the essay risks alienating readers who may resonate with aspects of the Great Awakening movement but disagree with its conclusions.

Conclusion

I personally wouldn’t trust gpt conclusion as it’s been mistaken on a few points but yes, some of the factors in its conclusion could be unpacked and added to the essay but it was already mentioned that there were other factors at play and that it wasn’t comprehensively going into everything. 
 

thanks for you time and giving me a something to expand upon if I need to go a bit deeper. 
 

each section could be turned into a book if it was comprehensively unpacked but I think we’d be loosing readers/listeners at that point. 
 

the individuals I’m hoping to reach with this essay don’t tend to understand nuance so it needs to remain a bit generalised and simplistic. 

[Adrian colby]

On 20/03/2025 at 8:42 PM, Nilsi said:

It’s ironic how this concecpt of the "Great Awakening" has done a full 180.

. For Dugin, this technological accelerationism was an imminent civilzational thread to Russia and had to be countered by a return to tradition, which, in his view, was the only way the subject could survive the future rather than be dissolved into a flat, object-oriented world.

that sounds like dugins making a return to tradition argument out of fear that the balance of technology use won’t be kept. Like everything else, there is the ‘thing’ and then there is its creative and destructive use. 
Like what was mentioned in the post below ‘belief’ is said to be something to be dissolved because of its inherent nature in self deception.  but fails to recognise its creative use in providing meaning to life and higher mind purpose for creating and holding onto reality by the very mechanism of belief. 
 

the suggestion of the subject being dissolved into an objective world… isn’t that what it’s trying to do anyway? Manifest itself into existence to experience ‘something’. 🤔
 

On 20/03/2025 at 8:42 PM, Nilsi said:

And yet, through some strange alchemy of Silicon Valley, QAnon and MAGA, the term has now been co-opted to mean precisely the opposite - often invoked in service of hyper-acceleration, techno-capitalist inevitability, or reactionary digital politics. So much for American and Russian agendas aligning, by the way.

I think that’s the point. It’s claiming to be one thing while behaving like another. 
 

thanks for responding 🙏

[Loving Radiance]

6 hours ago, Adrian colby said:

Wow, I think chat gpt misinterpreted the end of that paragraph. I notice that it tends to make mistakes when it interprets the context in which the words are used. I did indeed mention that the issue extends to educated people, people in governance and other classes so it wasn’t oversimplified there. I didn’t elaborate on various aspects throughout the piece to try and keep it to a 20 minute read but that most of those issues are mentioned. 

The sociological perspective is implied throughout the piece in various sections:

“Disillusioned with institutions”,

“reactionary response to global instability”, 

“economic stability, traditional values and freedom”

it would probably be beneficial to add technology alright! as in social media and its impact but it wasn’t necessary to make the point. 

again all the factors mentioned by gpt were mentioned. I do agree that there are real issues that are misinterpreted but that’s why the later part is concerned with introspection and discernment. 
I would also argue that a beings psychological and cognitive abilities are their filters for experiencing their reality beyond just awareness. The filters are where meaning is derived and if that is not working then everyone would only be dealing with interpretations and not the underlying reality. The point is trying to pull people back to ‘awareness’

 

I’ve had concerns about this and I’ve seen allot of hate and frustration towards maga people appearing on social media. I’ve tried convincing some ‘rant’ writers not to stoop their level but to try compassion and understanding as to why they are that way instead. People don’t respond well to a barrage of hate or judgment. They do need a bit of a gentler approach cause they are thin skinned. 
I was stuck in the movement early on around 2019 so I can see the real issues they are concerned about. It’s just that they started targeting things I was directly involved in so I knew the truth of it. I very quickly saw through the delusions from that point on and the whole idea of the movement fell appart for me. 

 

I won’t argue with that as everyone has a bias in order to hold a perspective to make a point. In order to see it though it requires holding multiple perspectives which ive been doing these past few years otherwise flicking from one side to another, experiencing the contrast, the issue wouldn’t have come to my attention. The point of the piece is not that there is a right or wrong ‘way’ or ‘path’ but rather spirituality and awakening states are about cultivating awareness not beleif. I’m not entirely sure gpt has the insight to spot that although my own interactions with it have been quite positive. 

the essay is addressing spiritual seekers not random populations. 

of course gpt would make this mistake. Transcending beleif also includes the use of beleif as a tool rather than an identity attachment. Transcendence is a recognition and integration of all prior factors in the processes of the mind ( just like the trans/rational fallacy mention where the trans rational also includes the understanding and implementation of prior stages) . I also mentioned not teaching advanced spirituality as in the workings of the mind of god ( beleif being a tool to hold the reality in coherence). As stated already a lot of people are falling into spirituality as a result of overwhelming struggle so the psychology needs to be addressed and stabilised first before throwing gods psychology at them on top of it. If a creator being is at the whims of its beleifs instead of creatively intending to use its beleifs to manifest reality, you end up with a chaotic hellscape. Just like the astral ( just what I refers to a vivid dream or altered state) if you are quite fear prone, your thoughts instantly form that way and you end up essentially running away and screaming at yourself. When you practice being more balanced, the experience of those states of consciousness become more pleasant and meaningful. Why dreams are great teachers to check on one’s own mind state. 

I personally wouldn’t trust gpt conclusion as it’s been mistaken on a few points but yes, some of the factors in its conclusion could be unpacked and added to the essay but it was already mentioned that there were other factors at play and that it wasn’t comprehensively going into everything. 
 

thanks for you time and giving me a something to expand upon if I need to go a bit deeper. 
 

each section could be turned into a book if it was comprehensively unpacked but I think we’d be loosing readers/listeners at that point. 
 

the individuals I’m hoping to reach with this essay don’t tend to understand nuance so it needs to remain a bit generalised and simplistic. 

Yes, I saw some mistakes GPT made and am grateful that you quoted some parts of your essay.