NoN-RaTiOnAL

new accusations of sadhguru's sexual misconduct

8 posts in this topic

Ah, the irony @NoN-RaTiOnAL posting an article that demands nothing but blind emotional reaction. Poetic.

This isn’t journalism, it’s manufactured outrage, a cocktail of anonymous testimonies, guilt by association, and strategic omission of legal context. When an article presupposes guilt instead of proving it, the goal isn’t truth, it’s manipulation.

Meanwhile, actual fugitives like Nithyananda, with confirmed criminal charges, conveniently escape scrutiny. If accountability was the goal, why does the media keep equating unverified allegations with proven crimes?

Rational thinking over reactionary outrage. But then again, that was never the point, was it? 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Topless girls is the best she's got?


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Titties out and touching their backs is a compliment. Unbelievable resilience by sadhguru. All these women got their titties out and not one has ever said he touched them.

Edited by Hojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather be abused by an enlightened man than get the best treatment of the average chump fool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Letho said:

Ah, the irony @NoN-RaTiOnAL posting an article that demands nothing but blind emotional reaction. Poetic.

This isn’t journalism, it’s manufactured outrage, a cocktail of anonymous testimonies, guilt by association, and strategic omission of legal context. When an article presupposes guilt instead of proving it, the goal isn’t truth, it’s manipulation.

Meanwhile, actual fugitives like Nithyananda, with confirmed criminal charges, conveniently escape scrutiny. If accountability was the goal, why does the media keep equating unverified allegations with proven crimes?

Rational thinking over reactionary outrage. But then again, that was never the point, was it? 😉

Well said!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

11 hours ago, Letho said:

Ah, the irony @NoN-RaTiOnAL posting an article that demands nothing but blind emotional reaction. Poetic.

This isn’t journalism, it’s manufactured outrage, a cocktail of anonymous testimonies, guilt by association, and strategic omission of legal context. When an article presupposes guilt instead of proving it, the goal isn’t truth, it’s manipulation.

Meanwhile, actual fugitives like Nithyananda, with confirmed criminal charges, conveniently escape scrutiny. If accountability was the goal, why does the media keep equating unverified allegations with proven crimes?

Rational thinking over reactionary outrage. But then again, that was never the point, was it? 😉

I actually support abusing your power as a guru and find this article inspiring. 
may you get to see topless babes daily my friend -_- namaskaram.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Oh god, I need to make an AI that upgrades articles to acceptable sanity standards before reading them. 🤦‍♀️

something that filters out 99.9% of human bullshit

Edited by integral

StopWork.ai - Voice Everything Browser Extension

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now