What "I am God" implies

[Hojo]

@Princess ArabiaThank you for admitting your arguments should not be considered because im essentially talking to a chat gpt that wansnt programmed to think and form rational thought patterns.

[Princess Arabia]

2 minutes ago, Hojo said:

@Princess ArabiaThank you for admitting your arguments should not be considered because im essentially talking to a chat gpt that wansnt programmed to think and form rational thought patterns.

Just because i laughed doesn't mean I was saying I was talking crap. It's all funny when trying to explain the unexplainable and the unknowable. 

[Hojo]

23 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

Just because i laughed doesn't mean I was saying I was talking crap. It's all funny when trying to explain the unexplainable and the unknowable. 

 

I am not talking crap either this is just what you are saying. You are saying you dont exist and nothing exist , if this is true everything I say and anyone says is true and you cant have an opinion. Whats having a disagreeing opinion?

Edited 3 hours ago by Hojo

[UnbornTao]

On 2/22/2025 at 5:07 PM, Eskilon said:

Are you a Buddhist rat? 
How do you know that a thought is a thought？
 

I'd start with experience: thinking about eating isn't the same as eating. So, we notice a difference here. But it is a good question.

As an analogy, no matter how big a cup is, it will never be able to hold the entirety of the ocean. Hence the assertion that what existence is can't be thought. Yet, we still confuse about it with it. We can remain open, though, and go after breakthroughs. 

Edited 2 hours ago by UnbornTao

[Princess Arabia]

2 hours ago, Hojo said:

 

I am not talking crap either this is just what you are saying. You are saying you dont exist and nothing exist , if this is true everything I say and anyone says is true and you cant have an opinion. Whats having a disagreeing opinion?

Where did i say I don't exist and nothing exists. Nothing is appearing as everything. In order for something to appear as something, it has to be nothing. This conversation is getting weird. Call it craps. Doesn't matter.

[UnbornTao]

9 hours ago, Davino said:

It's more wavy, I can see the walls and objects around me breathing but surely I'm still localized in the centre of my brain and parts of my body, which are solidities that don't allow non-localized spatious consciousness to be locked in.

In my case they come from a Consciousness stance. I wasn't vague, I am very clear: this moment is Infinity happening. It can become more Infinity surely but it is a permutation in Infinity and whole in itself.

Sometimes when I touch the corner of my table it feels like scratching my pinky toe.

We use the vehicle of thought as far as it can go, its limitations don't imply its premature discard.

Surely Consciousness is the One size fits all vehicle

I wasn't dismissing thought but rather pointing out its inadequacy when it comes to grasping infinity. We really think our notions, wants, experience, can be a consciousness of it.

Take into account beliefs can straight up generate experiences and states so that they are self-confirming and consistent with one's worldview. 

I'd be wary of readily claiming direct consciousness, unless it is in fact the case. "Is this a state, a perception? What am I for real when everything else is put aside?" 

Edited 51 minutes ago by UnbornTao