Europa: The Last Battle - DOCUMENTARY

[Average Actualizer]

Here is the link for it:

https://archive.org/embed/europa-the-last-battle_202209&playlist=1

It's really hard to find it because it gets deleted from most major internet video sites.

It's a documentary about the alternative story of both World Wars and their aftermath. Some of it can even be correlated to the present events like the Trump election victory or war in Gaza and many more.

It's 12 hours divided into 10 episodes, the last couple of episodes are really tough to watch emotionally but it's worth it nevertheless.

Of course this is just another perspective just like the one we get in school or on wikipedia so i'm not saying that everything presented is completely accurate and that you have to believe everything the documentary shows, i just think it's healthy to look at both sides especially with supressed topics.

The golden rule when it comes to historical events is: if you weren't there when it happend, you truly don't know what happend, you can only believe whatever version makes sense to you the most, based on all information you got.

To me personally the version that this documentary presents makes more sense than the mainstream one, but this is just my belief, it's fine if you disagree, and of course it doesn't have to be either this version or that version, it can be a mix too.

And of course this is a test of openmindedness, again this doesn't mean that you have to completely trust what you're seeing but i think it should at worst be given attention because being stuck with only 1 perspective can be a dangerous trap for dogma, especially if it's the mainstream one and especially if we're talking about historical events that by the defintion we can't directly experience.

(A little notice: the order of the playlist is a little messed up, the episode 10 is 2nd in a row in the playlist after episode 1 instead of it of course being the last one in the order, so don't accidently watch episode 1 and then episode 10 and then episode 2, lol.)

Edited February 18 by Average Actualizer

[Rafael Thundercat]

By the very beggining one can see the Bias of the Series. Of course Jews are not and were not saints in the History, so what? Hitler was doing de most "common sense" thing by eliminating them? 

In the Spain Iquisition the same, Jews sent to fire or away since they were not converting. 

[Raze]

It’s a neo nazi documentary. It’s nonsense.

[Topspin715]

While Europa: The Last Battle is overwhelmingly a work of historical revisionism and conspiracy theories, there are some elements of truth mixed with distortions. Here are a few aspects where it touches on real historical events but misrepresents them or places them in misleading contexts:

1. Allied War Crimes

It is true that the Allies committed some war crimes during and after World War II.

Dresden Bombing (1945) – The firebombing of Dresden by British and American forces killed tens of thousands of civilians. Historians debate whether it was a necessary military operation or excessive.

Soviet War Crimes – The Red Army engaged in mass rapes and killings during their advance into Germany, particularly in 1945.

Operation Keelhaul – The forced repatriation of Soviet citizens and prisoners of war by the British and Americans led to many being executed or sent to gulags.

However, Europa exaggerates these crimes while ignoring the overwhelming atrocities committed by Nazi Germany.

2. Post-War Influence of the U.S. and Soviet Union

After WWII, the U.S. and the Soviet Union became global superpowers, shaping Europe through NATO and the Warsaw Pact.

The U.S. did use economic and political influence to reshape Western Europe (e.g., the Marshall Plan). The Soviet Union imposed communist regimes in Eastern Europe.

However, the documentary frames this as a deliberate plot to "destroy" Europe rather than as part of Cold War geopolitics.

3. Banking and Financial Interests

Some international bankers and corporations did have economic interests in World War II.

Companies like IBM, Ford, and Standard Oil had business dealings with Nazi Germany before the U.S. entered the war.

However, Europa takes this fact and spins it into a broad conspiracy about Jewish control of global finance, which is a well-debunked anti-Semitic trope.

4. Cultural and Demographic Changes in Europe

The documentary criticizes immigration policies and social changes in post-war Europe.

It is true that mass immigration, particularly after the 1960s, changed European demographics and led to political debates on multiculturalism.

However, Europa portrays this as a deliberate plan to "eradicate" European identity rather than as a mix of economic, political, and humanitarian factors.

Conclusion

While Europa includes real events, it manipulates them into a conspiratorial narrative that distorts historical context and intent. It selectively presents facts while ignoring contradictory evidence, ultimately serving as propaganda rather than a serious historical analysis.

[Husseinisdoingfine]

This is a neo-nazi, antisemitic documentary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europa:_The_Last_Battle

https://www.adl.org/glossary/europa-last-battle

[CuriousJames]

“Neo nazis”, “anti semite”, “holocaust denier” = words people say in order to dismiss and demonize

While at times these titles may be accurate, I consistently find these folks never confront the claims being made. If ideas are faulty and could lead to hate or racism it’s important we expose the ideas by deconstructing them and showing how they are false. By calling people names to shut down the conversation you make the situation worse.

With that in mind, here’s a documentary of a Jew who went to Auschwitz with questions. 
https://yandex.ru/video/preview/4754137862114381692

Here’s another example, an expert on execution technology was hired to go to Europe to examine the chambers. https://rumble.com/v5hfcrt-the-holocaust-debunked-in-5-minutes-by-fred-leuchter-american-gas-chamber-e.html

Now in regards to why the Jews were treated in the way they were, consider the banks and how they were profiting off of the people through usury. Then also consider what happened in America in the 1800/1900’s in regards to banking. There’s much more and I would suggest the writings of  Alexander Solzhenitsyn, read his words and do your own thinking https://archive.org/details/200YearsTogether

If I questioned details about the murderous revolutions of China and Russia and yet was shunned by my government with laws in place to keep me quiet would that not weird?

Edited February 27 by CuriousJames

[CuriousJames]

“Ernst Zundel interviews Ingrid Rimland about her experiences during the War as a Mennonite.“

An account of one who was in the delousing/shower chambers - https://www.bitchute.com/video/U4nK0Nl2R2IZ

The full interview: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fFqMz8dxwo7w

Germany and it’s war with communism: “Dr. Ingrid Rimland talks about when the Germans invaded Ukraine“ https://yandex.com/video/preview/6329235056370806036

 

Edited February 27 by CuriousJames

[CuriousJames]

 

Edited February 27 by CuriousJames

[Topspin715]

On 2/26/2025 at 5:38 PM, CuriousJames said:

“Neo nazis”, “anti semite”, “holocaust denier” = words people say in order to dismiss and demonize

While at times these titles may be accurate, I consistently find these folks never confront the claims being made. If ideas are faulty and could lead to hate or racism it’s important we expose the ideas by deconstructing them and showing how they are false. By calling people names to shut down the conversation you make the situation worse.

For a lot of different reasons, Jews are disproportionately the recipients of unfair hatred and criticism, well beyond what one population can or should be required to handle.

A lot of times they single out isolated incidents and ascribe guilt to every single Jewish person.  There are over 13 million of us.  We shouldn't be responsible for deconstructing false or misleading claims for each and every one of us.

[Schizophonia]

lol this topic

[CuriousJames]

@Topspin715

3 hours ago, Topspin715 said:

For a lot of different reasons, Jews are disproportionately the recipients of unfair hatred and criticism, well beyond what one population can or should be required to handle.

A lot of times they single out isolated incidents and ascribe guilt to every single Jewish person.  There are over 13 million of us.  We shouldn't be responsible for deconstructing false or misleading claims for each and every one of us.

Thank you for engaging. Your response is understandable. As you suggest, isolated occasions should not be ascribed to every jewish person and I don’t like that either.  

Consider though, a big reason (amongst others) I say what I say, is because of the amount of Jews/Rabbis/Israeli’s speak to the gross distortions and whitewashing of WW2. Like any war both sides engage in propoganda and the same dynamics are playing out today so I do think conversation is important. 

 

Edited March 6 by CuriousJames