Why There Is no Evil

[ExploringReality]

@Sugarcoat

Do you think there is a possibility of transcending those dualities? 

[Sugarcoat]

1 hour ago, ExploringReality said:

@Sugarcoat

Do you think there is a possibility of transcending those dualities? 

I think the key is transcending yourself, dissolving yourself, then you can. But as long as you live on the human level you can’t, only to a certain degree can you accept “evil” but not fully. Some things you can’t accept , if someone puts a knife to your throat you will be afraid because you are human. Only if you dissolved the self fully could you not care; but hey even then you might react to it who knows. I don’t know becuase I haven’t dissolved myself 

[Schizophonia]

On 14/02/2025 at 4:50 AM, Letho said:

are just constructs. So why prefer yours?

 

To play !

[Schizophonia]

7 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

I don’t know becuase I haven’t dissolved myself 

5 MeO DMT calls you.

[Sugarcoat]

3 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

5 MeO DMT calls you.

It’s crazy what it does, one small dose and you’re almost gone. I don’t understand why it’s uncomfortable though, like if no self is the natural state how come it’s so uncomfortable to get there. I just know i wanna try it again, properly. Only if i lived alone

[Schizophonia]

21 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

It’s crazy what it does, one small dose and you’re almost gone. I don’t understand why it’s uncomfortable though, like if no self is the natural state how come it’s so uncomfortable to get there. I just know i wanna try it again, properly.

It's like anxiety is an asymptote at a point of no ego.

A lot of ego = Little fear.

Less ego = Always more fear until I go beyond the threshold of my ego death.

For me 5 MeO DMT is fear powder, because of the loss of control.

Maybe it would be better to vaporize it, thanks to the speed of the rise; There is also the foul taste that contributes to the bad trip.

21 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Only if i lived alone

Consider getting some gold dishes, I like them. 

 

Jk.

[ExploringReality]

@Sugarcoat

It is possible to transcend and collapse dualities because they are constructs of the human mind. Dualities do serve our survival, and there is a strong emotional charge pushing our drive to survive. Which is why even if you are directly conscious of Truth, the ego can still exhibit fears and desires like a zombie that won't die. It's okay to play the game of life and death while also knowing and seeing the big picture. The Absolute is imminent as well. There is an old saying paraphrased by Alan Watts " I pray that death doesn't find me still un annihilated" meaning the ego has disappeared before death caught up with it.

[Sugarcoat]

48 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

It's like anxiety is an asymptote at a point of no ego.

A lot of ego = Little fear.

Less ego = Always more fear until I go beyond the threshold of my ego death.

For me 5 MeO DMT is fear powder, because of the loss of control.

Maybe it would be better to vaporize it, thanks to the speed of the rise; There is also the foul taste that contributes to the bad trip.

Consider getting some gold dishes, I like them. 

 

Jk.

So a higher dose leading to direct no ego would be better to feel no anxiety is what I’m getting here? 
 

 

Edited Friday at 11:07 PM by Sugarcoat

[Sugarcoat]

6 minutes ago, ExploringReality said:

@Sugarcoat

It is possible to transcend and collapse dualities because they are constructs of the human mind. Dualities do serve our survival, and there is a strong emotional charge pushing our drive to survive. Which is why even if you are directly conscious of Truth, the ego can still exhibit fears and desires like a zombie that won't die. It's okay to play the game of life and death while also knowing and seeing the big picture. The Absolute is imminent as well. There is an old saying paraphrased by Alan Watts " I pray that death doesn't find me still un annihilated" meaning the ego has disappeared before death caught up with it.

Yea but to transcend these constructs of the mind you need to dissolve the mind/ego. At least what I think 

Edited Friday at 10:26 PM by Sugarcoat

[Schizophonia]

15 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

So a higher dose leading to direct no ego would be better to feel no anxiety is what I’m getting here? 

Yep, or with a quicker roa (so vaping or injecting).

16 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

 

You mean gold fishes? Hehe 

Ahah lol no I mean dishes with gold trim.

https://fr.123rf.com/photo_61554120_vaisselle-blanc-serti-de-garniture-dorée-sur-la-table.html

 

+Oh yes and the king size bed ofc, very important when you are 1m82 tall 

[Sugarcoat]

22 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Yep, or with a quicker roa (so vaping or injecting).

42 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

I did vaping but felt just a tad bit uncomfortable from the ego killing effect so my assumption was that a higher dose would make me even more uncomfortable but who knows maybe a higher dose would knock out the ego that feels uncomfortable counterintuitively

 

Edited Friday at 11:06 PM by Sugarcoat

[ExploringReality]

@Sugarcoat @Sugarcoat 

Go into it ready to die

[Letho]

11 hours ago, VeganAwake said:

Ah gotcha, so your foundation for your so-called morals, stems from fear of experiencing those consequences.....interesting 🤔

That so-called moral weight, is a completely fictional scale of measurement created by your very own conditioned way of thinking(matrix).

Labeling natural life experiences as evil, is just a lazy way of dealing with fear based problems.

Concocted stories from scared humans does not give anyone a very accurate moral compass!

There is no need here to waste my energy on rejecting the belief in a higher power. It just becomes blatantly obvious, that these ridiculous fear based religious stories have nothing to do with truth!

Stop believing that humans from thousands of years ago or any time period, had some kind of sacred knowledge to pass down. Those people we're just as clueless as humans are today about How & Why! Only worse because they created a bunch of BS stories raging chaos across the planet as a religious weapon of war!

So one could actually say the concept of Evil was created by ignorance & fear!

❤️ 

@VeganAwake If evil is a fiction, does harm cease to exist? Suffering is real, regardless of belief. Calling morality an illusion is just another belief, one that evades accountability. The question isn’t who created evil, but who takes responsibility when harm is done? Dismissing it changes nothing. Your philosophy so far, is still very child like, you haven’t stretched past the corridors of naivety where there are still many doors waiting for you to explore. Everyone is here to learn so at least you re engaging, I am teaching.

[VeganAwake]

5 hours ago, Letho said:

@VeganAwake If evil is a fiction, does harm cease to exist? Suffering is real, regardless of belief. Calling morality an illusion is just another belief, one that evades accountability. The question isn’t who created evil, but who takes responsibility when harm is done? Dismissing it changes nothing. Your philosophy so far, is still very child like, you haven’t stretched past the corridors of naivety where there are still many doors waiting for you to explore. Everyone is here to learn so at least you re engaging, I am teaching.

Well it's not a philosophy or a belief and it doesn't teach anything. It doesn't lead anyone anywhere or have an agenda to push. It's an empty message.

Its also not an attempt to swap one belief out for another. It leaves the canvas blank without any paint on it.

It's very "childlike" in the sense that it's prior to the societal conditioning most are subjected to, while growing up!

It's similar to Ralstons discussions about Unknowing.....but its also not that, and simultaneously it includes that as well because it's Everything.

It has nothing to do with so-called knowledge, experience or teaching of any sort.

Its a communication attempting to point out the Unconditional Freedom of Everything, exactly as it appears to be, and prior to any so-called knowledge about it!

It's not even a something to be gotten because it's already the case.

❤️ 

[Letho]

20 hours ago, VeganAwake said:

Well it's not a philosophy or a belief and it doesn't teach anything. It doesn't lead anyone anywhere or have an agenda to push. It's an empty message.

Its also not an attempt to swap one belief out for another. It leaves the canvas blank without any paint on it.

It's very "childlike" in the sense that it's prior to the societal conditioning most are subjected to, while growing up!

It's similar to Ralstons discussions about Unknowing.....but its also not that, and simultaneously it includes that as well because it's Everything.

It has nothing to do with so-called knowledge, experience or teaching of any sort.

Its a communication attempting to point out the Unconditional Freedom of Everything, exactly as it appears to be, and prior to any so-called knowledge about it!

It's not even a something to be gotten because it's already the case.

❤️ 

@VeganAwake Okay, let’s backtrack. So far you've argued that evil doesn’t exist, morality is just conditioning, suffering is just another experience, morality needs a higher power, evil was created by fear, and your stance isn’t a philosophy but some kind of pure, blank awareness. Now, here’s where every one of those falls apart, if evil is just a construct, does suffering disappear when you stop believing in it? If morality is just conditioning, why do independent cultures form moral codes based on lived reality, not doctrine? If morality requires a higher power, why does cause and effect dictate responsibility regardless of belief? If evil was just "created by fear," why does even an infant recognize harm? Now in this latest response, you say your view isn’t a belief, yet you defend it like one. You claim it’s an “empty message,” yet you repeatedly reinforce it, why push an idea that “leads nowhere”? You call it “childlike” as if that’s clarity, but a child instinctively knows when they’re hurt, so what exactly is this "freedom" you keep talking about if it requires ignoring harm? You reference Ralston’s "Unknowing" while contradicting yourself by both rejecting and including it, it’s not profound, it’s just evasive. And the final dodge “It’s not something to be gotten because it already is”, which means absolutely nothing because morality, suffering, and responsibility aren’t just theoretical states, they require engagement. Every time you're confronted with real consequences, you move the goalpost, shifting definitions to avoid any structured accountability, responsibility, or ethical foundation. This isn’t deep, it’s just an elaborate way to excuse detachment while avoiding the burden of clarity.

[integral]

For the same reason you don’t eat rocks