New Mod Davino

[AION]

4 minutes ago, Jacob Morres said:

is this a real comment lol 

 

[Schizophonia]

1 minute ago, Princess Arabia said:

This is why some men are considered shallow because they don't consider the mindsets of these women and the types of women that go for these men, only that they are HOT. Hotness, wears off and you'll have to deal with the disturbed mind that finds this attractive after awhile. It's fine, but don't complain when that hot girl turns out to be a cold bitch.

I checked on google and his wife is just his looksmatch, basically. 

And mentalmatch, lol.

[Princess Arabia]

Just now, Schizophonia said:

I checked on google and his wife is just his looksmatch, basically. 

And mentalmatch, lol.

No, men want just hot, that's why they get burnt. Hehe. Don't mind me.

[James123]

Just now, Princess Arabia said:

No, men want just hot, that's why they get burnt. Hehe. Don't mind me.

Loyalty, kindness, purity are the most important features that one can should consider as beauty of woman. 

Heaven is located at the underfoot of woman. Prophet Muhammad. 

[UnbornTao]

Keep to the main thread guys.

[RightHand]

34 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Why don't you use left hand instead?

Too inefficient! The right one is a virtuoso 

Edited 11 hours ago by RightHand

[Sugarcoat]

3 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

Keep to the main thread guys.

Someone should start a thread titled like “discussion about whatever” and no mod can say this 😹😹😹

[UnbornTao]

2 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Someone should start a thread titled like “discussion about whatever” and no mod can say this 😹😹😹

 

[Schizophonia]

12 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

No, men want just hot, that's why they get burnt. Hehe. Don't mind me.

The sweetness, the fragility, the devotion is what makes me fall in love.

[Leo Gura]

Okay, move along.

[Carl-Richard]

5 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

1) He is quite attractive, intelligent and somewhat famous.

My God did you just call Sv3rige intelligent?

He once tried to debunk a statement in a video he was reacting to by referencing a study and linking it in the description for people to read. He linked a case study from the 1800s. A case study, from the 18 fucking 00s. I'm not joking.

And it didn't even address the statement, as the statement was about the total digestive time of different foods from consumption to excretion while the case study only looked at digestive time in the stomach. I'm still not joking.

I pointed it out and it seems like he has now removed the link.

EDIT:

Haha I just saw the topic was locked, I was so eager to respond I forgot about it. I apologize 🙂🙏

Edited 6 hours ago by Carl-Richard