AION

Do you pay for the first date?

131 posts in this topic

6 minutes ago, Hojo said:

Since beauty is my main egoic force I will refuse to ask a man on a date. If he rejects me I will be to upset to date again. Instead I speak in code languages with my eyes to signal that I am asking him. If he asks me however I will not go unless he pays for everything because he should value my time. If he dosent do this he is entitled because my time is valuable.

Sorry but that's your childish interpretation of what's being said. I mentioned nothing about being beautiful and I know lots of ugly women who feel the same way. A feminine woman's style of approach is seductive and more passive. A masculine wonanls style is forceful and aggressive. A man pays for a date he asks a woman out on, period end of story whether she's ugly, beautiful, rich or whatever unless she offers to and vice versa. I mentioned nothing about valuing my time but his way of appreciating me for accepting his offer and I will do the same in ways that expresses my femininity and without it being an exchange of time for pay. A man will understand what I'm saying. A grown mature man. One who has had lots of experience with ladies, not girls and teenie bobbers. 


What you know leaves what you don't know and what you don't know is all there is. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Princess ArabiaHave you ever witnessed these mysterious men? Every man is a child pretending, maturity is a joke. They sold you a fairytale.

Edited by Hojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

A man pays for a date he asks a woman out on, period end of story whether she's ugly

You are being so close minded.

5 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

A man will understand what I'm saying. A grown mature man. One who has had lots of experience with ladies, not girls and teenie bobbers. 

And it's upsetting how you don't even respect people having other worldviews.

Not sure what a teenie bobber is but I would rather be with them if they are nice to others, at least.


From beasts we scorn as soulless, in forest, field, and den,
the cry goes up to witness the soullessness of men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Something Funny I insult her beauty ego she goes to accusing me of molesting teenagers while denying what I am saying. Classic.

Edited by Hojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hojo said:

@Something Funny I insult her beauty ego she goes to accusing me of molesting children while denying I am doing it.

 

Idk what you are talking about.


From beasts we scorn as soulless, in forest, field, and den,
the cry goes up to witness the soullessness of men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Princess Arabia said:

Nothing wrong on saying that to a group of people or a gf, but it's very inappropriate to put a lady through that.

If she can’t afford $50 for half a dinner I’d like to know that sooner rather than later lol

Also you talk a lot about how one should be open to other perspectives here, but that seems to apply only when that other perspective is yours.

When it’s reversed you don’t seem particularly open to anything other than your own opinions. Just something I noticed in this thread. Make of that what you will.

Edited by something_else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geesh, you would think I'm asking him to pay my college tuition or rent or car note. It's only a date that he asked me to go on and i would only accept if I liked him. Not just for a free meal. I can feed myself. I am nit going to keep explaining myself just to get insulted and be misinterpreted and words put in my mouth because of your preconceived notions about women. Lots of these rebuttals are mentioning nothing I've stated and no one is mentioning the fact that I said I would pay for the date if I asked a man out. Just because I don't ask men out doesn't negate that fact. I've done it in the past many times. I just don't anymore. I don't have to explain why. 

I have to take into consideration who I'm debating with and the type of mindsets. Nothing negative just different and at a different stage. I'm much older than most of you and more experienced and understand somewhat that men and women are different and are attracted to different things. Also culture and regions play a role. My mindset is definitely not one of entitlement, think because I'm beautiful that men should pay for everything or that i'm better or deserve more just for being a woman. I don't think that way. Neither does my stance has to do with treating the guy as a trick or a sex worker or anything on those regards. Those are different matters.

All I'm saying is my stance and this is my personal stance that I'm getting slack for, is if a man asks me out on a personal date, then he is expected to foot the bill that's it. To ne that's just proper dating etiquette just like I won't expect to be on my phone throughout a romantic date because it's bad manners, or constantly keep looking at another guy or things of that nature. For me it's about manners and etiquette in this regard and nothing about what you are all referring to especially @Hojo. So off-track.

With this said, I'm respectfully dismissing myself from this conversation as I can't think of anything else to say to make my point or to express myself as to how I see this. Instead, I'm getting backlashes and insinuations of a user, entitled because of beauty and not seeing the man for who he genuinely is etcetc. I have said all I have to say and will stick to what I'm saying with feelings of dignity and respect to and for myself for the way i feel about all this. I respect your opinions but I refuse to be put on the stand and be belittled for the way I feel about this matter. The only stance I have here is if a man asks me out on a date he should be responsible for that date. I didn't even mention this before but I will now, he should even make sure as a woman that I have a safe way of getting there and a safe way of getting back home or wherever my head will lay for the evening. That's not too much to ask and I make no excuses for these expectations. Chow.

Edited by Princess Arabia

What you know leaves what you don't know and what you don't know is all there is. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Women actively approach and insert themselves into the lives of the most attractive men because they know competition is high. If you are not one of those guys who women initiate contact with, maybe it's better to not date and let women share and compete over those men which deep down if you read between the lines is what they really want. Obviously interacting with and dating an average man with no status is beneath women. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, AION said:

@Princess Arabia is the type of woman that you should go 50/50 on. Especially on the first date after you know you are not going to see her again. One shouldn’t encourage this kind of behavior. 
 

 

Or could just abruptly decide to stand up and excusing yourself that "you have to go to the bathroom" and then escape, leaving her to pay for 100% of the bill. That would be even better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most important is not if you pay or not if you are dating in a western culture. Or if you are good looking or not. Or how much money you have. Although all of these are variables at play and they do have an influence, most important is if you can make a connection with her and provide her fun/emotional intimacy/connection/etc. But the thing is that not all women have this western mindset.
What you don't have in emotional and social intelligence you have to make up for in other ways like with your wallet, looks, status, and so on. Most guys don't know how to develop emotional and social intelligence (granted it is very difficult to develop if you haven't developed in your teenage years) so they overcompensate with wealth, physique, status and so on. It does work. Imagine Elon Musk not having his wealth, status and money, it would be very hard for him to get a wife but if you have power women will give you a lot of leeway. The thing is that women don't know how much power you have the first moment you meet them so they go off pinging your emotional intelligence and social status because that is a good indicator how successful you are. This happens mostly subconscious. And if you fumble with who is going to pay, it shows that you don't have emotional and social intelligence but the thing is if a girl is a pain in the ass, you shouldn't care about what she feels about you. At the end you should do you and listen to your intuition which is of paramount worth, much more worth than some strange.

Edited by AION

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, AION said:

Most important is not if you pay or not if you are dating in a western culture. Or if you are good looking or not. Or how much money you have. Although all of these are variables at play and they do have an influence, most important is if you can make a connection with her and provide her fun/emotional intimacy/connection/etc. But the thing is that not all women have this western mindset.
What you don't have in emotional and social intelligence you have to make up for in other ways like with your wallet, looks, status, and so on. Most guys don't know how to develop emotional and social intelligence (granted it is very difficult to develop if you haven't developed in your teenage years) so they overcompensate with wealth, physique, status and so on. It does work. Image Elon Musk not having his wealth, status and money, it would be very hard for him to get a wife but if you have power women will give you a lot of leeway. The thing is that women don't know how much power you have the first moment you meet them so they go off pinging your emotional intelligence and social status because that is a good indicator how successful you are. This happens mostly subconscious.

Things like status and wealth can in some cases signal that the man has traits such as being ambitious, a leader, confident, charming, depending on how he acquired that status and wealth. So it’s like a woman might not be attracted to those things in and of themselves but rather what they signal about the man. Because it takes a special person to get to the top with status and wealth, although ofc not in all cases you can get there by being phony and exploitative too. 
 

A comparison could be like in high school if a popular guy is liked by many girls. Is he liked because he is popular or because of the traits that made him popular (for example charismatic and good looking)? Could be both. Because it can be like a boost to one’s own self image to have a successful partner. Same with having popular friends. And vice versa.

Edited by Sugarcoat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole point of life is not to under or overcompensate but to find the middle way which is wisdom. Most people overcompensate because they were under compensated in their youth. This is the story of most wealthy people but also spiritual people. I mean Elon Musk wouldn't be Elon Musk if he didn't have a terrible childhood.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AION said:

The whole point of life is not to under or overcompensate but to find the middle way which is wisdom. Most people overcompensate because they were under compensated in their youth. This is the story of most wealthy people but also spiritual people. I mean Elon Musk wouldn't be Elon Musk if he didn't have a terrible childhood.

 

You mean that he had a bad childhood causing issues with self esteem which makes them overcompensate by trying to be for example smart and successful to gain self esteem? Or aquire wealth because they had little of it in childhood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Things like status and wealth can in some cases signal that the man has traits such as being ambitious, a leader, confident, charming, depending on how he acquired that status and wealth. So it’s like a woman might not be attracted to those things in and of themselves but rather what they signal about the man. Because it takes a special person to get to the top with status and wealth, although ofc not in all cases you can get there by being phony and exploitative too. 

Agreed but I don't think being a moral man is the gold standard for women.  Look around how many women are swirling around immoral powerful men.

Edited by AION

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the game of survival, moral/immoral is not a thing at play. In love and war there are no rules. That is a very painful lesson that I learned. I wish I believed it the first moment I heard it but sometimes you need to suffer. 😅

Edited by AION

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, AION said:

Agreed but I don't think being a moral man is the gold standard for women.  Look around how much women are swirling around immoral powerful men.

That may be true but then we have to take into consideration the quality of women that they attract. A woman who is primarily attracted to a man’s power, money, status, or for being a manipulative player will probably be more shallow, perhaps insecure in herself, immature. It’s similar to how a woman with good looks will attract more men, but those that are primarily drawn to her because of her looks will not be as high quality. So those people attract more in quantity, but not necessarily in quality

Edited by Sugarcoat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

That may be true but then we have to take into consideration the quality of women that they attract. A woman who is primarily attracted to a man’s power, money, status, or for being a manipulative player will probably be more shallow, perhaps insecure in herself, immature. It’s similar to how a woman with good looks will attract more men, but those that are primarily drawn to her because of her looks will not be as high quality. So those people attract more in quantity, but not necessarily in quality

That is true but at least they are getting something. The regular nice guy is not getting any. Most guys would have something than nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use your money in service to God only, and God will tell how to use that money. Problem solved 


Imagine for a moment, dear friends, that you are Conciousness, and that you have only this one awareness - that you are at peace, and that you are. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, AION said:

The regular nice guy is not getting any.

The regular nice guy with no social life isn't getting any.

Most of the 'regular nice guys' I've met who have an active social life are getting laid at least sometimes.

The idea that 'the regular nice guy is getting nothing' comes from incel subcultures that are composed of guys who are chronically online and rarely leave their house. They conclude that women must not like them because they are 'regular nice guys' but it isn't that. It's because they have no social skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah first date simple almost pre-date, bar for a drink or coffee or shisha, cool place but not too expensive. I'd definitely pay the first date however it went, if it's buying rounds of drinks and they want to buy a round that's cool and prob a good sign. I wouldn't go for a meal or anything like that, it's more just getting to know each other and having a bit of fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now