Musk fascist salute

[zazen]

I came across this on X

[Inliytened1]

On 1/26/2025 at 7:50 AM, manuel bon said:

I don't know if there's already a discussion about it here. 

Musk is not that stupid to not know that's the fascist salute... Kinda scary imo

I guess Jews should flee the country now...there is a nazi in our midst.

[Recursoinominado]

54 minutes ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

Damn

[manuel bon]

3 hours ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

Wow

 

[Inliytened1]

3 hours ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

@zazen first off..assuming this is all true..remember you must first put your authority into Dr. Phillip Low for this to carry any merit at all --

It would mean that his ego has corrupted him.  Fame, wealth, and power have all corrupted him.

Precisely what is new with this? What makes him so special in that regard?

To give him any extra added attention only feeds this guys ego.  

A deeper question is doesn't everyone really in their hearts think they're better? I mean wouldn't you have to in order to survive and rise above?  

Yeah I don't like it when one expresses arrogance either- that they are above everyone else - but the thing about that is when you express arrogance publicly that’s actually a sign of insecurity and that you have something to prove. 

So he's a giant immature, arrogant kid.  Maybe he idolized Hitler as a kid.  Who knows. Who cares.  They say he's autistic too.  Regardless.. I doubt he's going to be sending anyone to the gas chambers anytime soon.

Get over it. 

Edited Tuesday at 09:58 PM by Inliytened1

[manuel bon]

@Inliytened1 being a Nazi or simply sympathizing with Nazi ideals doesn't mean that you would throw someone in a gas chamber. It's not so black and white.

[Inliytened1]

7 minutes ago, manuel bon said:

@Inliytened1 being a Nazi or simply sympathizing with Nazi ideals doesn't mean that you would throw someone in a gas chamber. It's not so black and white.

Well yes it does actually.   It means you wouldn't condone it or try to stop it.  

Edited Tuesday at 11:03 PM by Inliytened1

[Whitney Edwards]

5 hours ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

That's quite the thing. It does seem like Elon. 

[Joshe]

5 hours ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

Sounds about right. If those details about recent events are true, it all tracks with his psychology. Seems he might be more driven by spite than shits and giggles. 

[Leo Gura]

Musk clearly said he is waging a war against "the woke mind virus". So that is what he is doing. Part of that is to infuriate the woke. Which is straight out of Trump's playbook.

[Basman]

6 hours ago, zazen said:

I came across this on X

 

19 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Musk clearly said he is waging a war against "the woke mind virus". So that is what he is doing. Part of that is to infuriate the woke. Which is straight out of Trump's playbook.

I guess I underestimated Musk if that is all true. I thought he was a just cringey edgelord. He must have a pretty wacky worldview to not be content with just being inanely rich. Though we already knew that he's an egomaniac.

[Leo Gura]

26 minutes ago, Basman said:

He must have a pretty wacky worldview to not be content with just being inanely rich.

This is actually a mistake in leftist thinking.

Musk is not driven by money as leftists want to believe. He doesn't need any more money. The average Marxist is more driven by money than Musk. What drives Musk is power and the desire to reshape the world to his ideas of how it should be. He believes his ideas of how the world should be are the best, and that this justifies any means. He needs power and money to reshape the world to his vision. That is the point. The real currency here is not money, it's influence.

His worldview is not so wacky. What is wacky is that he thinks his vision should crush everyone else. It is deeply anti-democractic. He wants to be a benevolent monarch. But he doesn't understand that the ego which runs him cannot be benevolent because it is the very root of corruption.

Musk thinks he can be a benevolent monarch without doing personal, spiritual, or epistemic development. That is the real issue. For Musk to be benevolent monarch he would first need to cure himself of his wild narcissism and corruption.

Edited yesterday at 01:23 AM by Leo Gura

[Inliytened1]

35 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

This is actually a mistake in leftist thinking.

Musk is not driven by money as leftists want to believe. He doesn't need any more money. The average Marxist is more driven by money than Musk. What drives Musk is power and the desire to reshape the world to his ideas of how it should be. He believes his ideas of how the world should be are the best, and that this justifies any means. He needs power and money to reshape the world to his vision. That is the point. The real currency here is not money, it's influence.

His worldview is not so wacky. What is wacky is that he thinks his vision should crush everyone else. It is deeply anti-democractic. He wants to be a benevolent monarch. But he doesn't understand that the ego which runs him cannot be benevolent because it is the very root of corruption.

Musk thinks he can be a benevolent monarch without doing personal, spiritual, or epistemic development. That is the real issue. For Musk to be benevolent monarch he would first need to cure himself of his wild narcissism and corruption.

If he actually got into politics I'd be worried about this psycho.  But outside of that whether he jerks off to hairy pussys or not is of little concern.    

[Leo Gura]

21 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

If he actually got into politics

He IS in politics.

Politics doesn't need to be holding office.

Musk has massive political influence and potential to corrupt politicians.

Most of politics happens behind closed doors, not through official channels. Especially now with Trump.

The only silver lining with Musk is that he is so obnxiously narccisistic that I doubt any leaders in politics or business will want to work with him long-term. Trump will throw Musk under the bus soon. Where that leaves Musk will be unclear. Musk's unhinged behavior will turn off many respectable business leaders and executives because they won't want to partner with a domineering asshole.

Musk's #1 problem is that he is incapable of sharing power with anyone. He wants full control over the relationship. But that kind of style cannot work in a liberal democracy where people are your equals, not your vassals.

Edited yesterday at 02:15 AM by Leo Gura

[Inliytened1]

5 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

He IS in politics.

Politics doesn't need to be holding office.

Musk has massive political influence and potential to corrupt politicians.

Most of politics happens behind closed doors, not through official channels. Especially now with Trump.

The only silver lining with Musk is that he is so obnxiously narccisistic that I doubt any leaders in politics or business will want to work with him long-term. Trump will throw Musk under the bus soon. Where that leaves Musk will be unclear. Musk's unhinged behavior will turn off many respectable business leaders and executives because they won't want to partner with a domineering asshole.

Musk's #1 problem is that he is incapable of sharing power with anyone.

That's what I mean.  A guy like him has to have complete control to really be a threat politically.  

[Leo Gura]

Musk should not be underestimated. He has a lot of tricks up his sleeve and could do a lot of political damage, similar to Trump.

[Inliytened1]

11 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Musk should not be underestimated. He has a lot of tricks up his sleeve and could do a lot of political damage, similar to Trump.

We'll see..because the floor is his.  He's not going to tire in Trump's eyes

He has more influence now than he ever will.

I don't think he'll ever run because of the autism.

 

 

Edited yesterday at 02:35 AM by Inliytened1

[Ero]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Musk thinks he can be a benevolent monarch without doing personal, spiritual, or epistemic development. That is the real issue. For Musk to be benevolent monarch he would first need to cure himself of his wild narcissism and corruption.

So would you agree that it is possible for systematic change to be achieved by a benevolent/ enlightened monarch, akin to Socrates’ “philosopher-king”?

Edited yesterday at 03:39 AM by Ero

[Frylock]

When someone tells you who they are (or in this case, shows you), then you should believe them.

[Inliytened1]

43 minutes ago, Ero said:

So would you agree that it is possible for systematic change to be achieved by a benevolent/ enlightened monarch, akin to Socrates’ “philosopher-king”?

Lol.  You think an enlightened being would be a monarch.  Ask Marcus Aurelius.  Maybe he was but he knew better.

Edited yesterday at 04:21 AM by Inliytened1