Thought Art

Post Modernism Pt 2

136 posts in this topic

@Leo Gura I appreciate your work. Thank you.


 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Thought Art How crazy is it to have such a great speaker at your finger tips that you can critique the act of repetition within a presentation?

If you held anyone else to that standard they would evaporate.

Leo says, ‘It was bad’ and carries on lmao.

Amazing shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leo is the greatest speaker of all time. He is the bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another issue with the woke was they were trying to do forced oppression. So if I am a black person and I have had some struggles in my life they would come to me and say "You are oppressed, these are the people screwing you over, and these are the steps you need to take to correct it" and I say "No I don't feel that and I am quite fine with my life I don't want to take any measures at all sure there has been struggles but it's all good" they would snap back and say "that must mean you have internalized racism so now we definitely need to take steps against the oppressors" 

Basically people could feel that the woke was trying to recruit them into the army of stormtroopers even against their own wishes 

This is what I personally observed and even experienced a bit and I think that's a huge problem that scared a lot of people away 

Edited by Twentyfirst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yetineti Leo knows he is world class he built all this and has done it for years. He is a big boy he can handle some constructive feedback. 
 

I can’t hold a candle to his work soooo. It’s feedback from his audience. 


 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, yetineti said:

Leo is the greatest speaker of all time. He is the bar.

He is unique and unparalleled. 
 

He stands among the greats. I’ve been listening to many great speakers from Nightingale Conent which I find inspiring. Also, I really like Brandon Burchard. 

Edited by Thought Art

 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Whitney Edwards I released Mountaintops - Pine Haven months ago which I’m happy with. This song seems to have a growing audience.
 

I plan on investing in my own recording and producing setup at the end of the summer. 

I am completely focused on my Qigong business and getting my sales funnel and course finely tuned and profitable right now so unfortunately music is secondary. 
 

Thanks for asking. When it gets released it will be very good music.

Edited by Thought Art

 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Thought Art said:

@Whitney Edwards I released Mountaintops months ago which I’m happy with. 
 

I plan on investing in my own recording and producing setup at the end of the summer. 
 

I am completely focused on my Qigong business and getting my sales funnel and course finely tuned and profitable right now so unfortunately music is secondary. 
 

Thanks for asking. When it gets released it will be very good music.

Yay. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Whitney Edwards I do live streams of a bunch of my original songs sometimes on Effortless Qigong.

Edited by Thought Art

 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate the feedback.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yetineti Welcome Toastmasters and guests!


 "Unburdened and Becoming" - Bon Iver

                            ◭"89"

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

@Whitney Edwards I do live streams of a bunch of my original songs sometimes on Effortless Qigong.

Do you have a YouTube channel? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LambdaDelta said:

It's a sort of prelude to the subconscious reprogramming course (whatever happened to that btw?)

IIRC, it's coming this 2025.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was one of the best and most profound episodes yet, although subtly so. It was a sophisticated and nuanced exposition of what proper sense making and epistemology entails in the worldly/Shakti sense, which is a lot more messy, detailed and twisted than in the realm of Godhead/Shiva. A contrast to this episode would be the "what is reality episode" which is entirely in the realm of Shiva. Although that episode was extremely profound of course, it is basically about one truth, since the realm of Shiva is absolute oneness and therefore simpleness; the entire video was about the one radical truth of infinite imagination in this very moment. Very abstract and spiritual. And actually a lot easier in a sense to make than this video. In this video Leo really went into the nitty gritty of sense making of the world and you could see him struggling because so many points are so nuanced and complex, and hard to explicate properly, in contrast to saying "everything is fucking imaginary and there is no past or future, you are imagining everything right now". This video really went deep into the structure of our fractal worldly consciousness and not the ultimate structure of Shiva consciousness which is ultimate radicalness, oneness and transcendence. No one has done this so far. This video has profound implications and is a piece of art imo. But its subtly this way because it seems less radical than the "Shiva" videos. It's hard for me to explain why it's so good but this one is a huge one. The person complaining about some style mistakes or repetition imo does not really get how advanced this vid is and how much it integrates his previous vids with the real world.

My critique is that instead of making the distinction between 1st order truth and 2nd order truth, this naming is not accurate because it implies that there can be more orders of truth above level 2. It's not about orders of truth, it is not an increasing hierarchy, but actually a binary between Shiva and Shakti, or Godhead and world, whatever you want to call it. Shiva is absolute truth while Shakti is infinite relativity and worldliness. The postmodernist recognizes Shakti's nature but not Shivas. The naming of 1st/2nd order truth implies an ordinal sequence which is imo not correct. 

What still baffles me is that in this Video there is such a loving Leo with very positive energy, talking about spiritual values like sovereignty of all consciousnesses, etc. while on the blog and forum he talks about things like genetic superiority and empirical justification of worldly elites and devilry. We would never hear about such stances in his videos and there is something deeply sinister about that.

Edited by gengar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, gengar said:

What still baffles me is that in this Video there is such a loving Leo with very positive energy, talking about spiritual values like sovereignty of all consciousnesses, etc. while on the blog and forum he talks about things like genetic superiority and empirical justification of worldly elites and devilry. We would never hear about such stances in his videos and there is something deeply sinister about that.

Dude. That’s your uncharitable reading, stop doing that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27/01/2025 at 2:14 PM, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Bottom line is that, leftist woke postmodernist philosophy/ideology is only allowed to be created and exist due to significant technological progress. So that you can sit in your comfortable little chairs and philosophise. In a way, they're perfect examples of armchair philosophers

It's not the only thing that is necessary for it to bloom, but it is a necessary prerequisite

One thing I hate about Liberal woke people in Europe is how they love to preach extremist postmodernist things like gender-neutral raising of children, and a true despising of traditional gender roles, while they have no qualms about the fact that the people dying in Ukraine are mostly men that are forced to join the army while the women get too flee. They somehow don't see that this is the material reason of traditional gender roles in the first place. They literally don't see the hypocrisy in it. They are embodiments of millennial woke liberal memes of soy milk drinking people with strongly explicated subversive ideas about society, and they have an intense hatred for Putin. But they don't see that raising your sons that they can wear dresses and all that stuff means less defensive power against a potential enemy like the Russians. I wish I was exaggerating but I'm not, I empirically found that this is the level of left leaning liberals in western Europe, they are living memes.

This is why I have more respect for true socialist types like the Black Panthers where women also have to fight the same way as men. They were true egalitarians and not some elitarian twisted "woke" shit like the libs. But they came with their own universe of bullshit but it's more ideologically bullshit and not hypocritical like liberals are and also don't even exist anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, gambler said:

Dude. That’s your uncharitable reading, stop doing that. 

Claiming the true existence of genetic superiority is absolutely a huge thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@gengar One of the worst things about their hypocrisy as it relates to their disdain for gender norms, is that they absolutely hate perceived repression of femininity in girls. But are pro repression of masculinity for boys. The extreme aspects of femininity can be protected. Like making it socially unacceptable to slut shame. But have you ever heard of making it unacceptable to fuck-boy shame? This word can be used to shame men for sleeping around, it’s not a word that is necessarily applied in accordance with its strict definition (being manipulative). Yet, fuck boys, as used to shame how sexual a man is, are an example of toxic masculinity (because the man sees women as objects for sex). But sluts are not an example of toxic femininity because as a matter of fact, the libs haven’t even defined what toxic femininity is yet. 

Edited by gambler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now