Mega-Thread of Low vs High Perspectives

[Terell Kirby]

Great example of a low perspective take on the Trump-Zelenskyy Oval Office confrontation.

Note: it’s important for me to not get lost in the progressive/liberal echo chamber that assumes Trump and Vance’s behavior was seen as equally appalling across the board. This was red meat for most MAGA people-equivalent to pro wrestling/UFC/junk food-pure dopamine, pure entertainment, pure ego. They love Trump and Vance for this kind of stuff.

Edited March 2 by Terell Kirby

[aurum]

Low: circular reasoning, question-begging, justification

 

This one is also good:

 

Edited Sunday at 11:36 PM by aurum

[aurum]

I find this take simplistic. It understates the challenge of actually tackling climate change.

But I still feel it is good all things considered.

 

High: non-ideological, non-partisan, global perspective, empirical, risk-reward analysis

 

Edited Monday at 12:27 AM by aurum