Leo is NOT Construct Aware

[Breakingthewall]

38 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

You didn't have to be that gruesome about it.

Yes, or when the doctor tells you that you have a cancer in the brain. You will think that maybe reality is, let's say, wild. Nobody control it, nobody creates that shit, it's the flow of the existence, the whell of karma

Edited 23 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Butters]

4 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

@Butters Your ego clearly isn’t in control of things outside your control.

But I was hoping if I keep raising my vibration that I'll be able to pretty much construct my reality consciously, by focusing my loving attention on the things I want and not on anything I don't want. 

Edit: then why am I talking about this... well who knows. I get curious about these things. 

Edited 23 hours ago by Butters

[Leo Gura]

Just now, Butters said:

But I was hoping if I keep raising my vibration that I'll be able to pretty much construct my reality consciously, by focusing my loving attention on the things I want and not on anything I don't want. 

Nice fantasy you got there. Would be a shame if something came along and spoiled it.

[Butters]

2 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Nice fantasy you got there. Would be a shame if something came along and spoiled it.

Rhonda Byrne, Bob Proctor, Esther Hicks, these are similar teachings to what I am talking about. Are you saying they're wrong? 

[Inliytened1]

12 minutes ago, Yimpa said:

It is quite healthy to observe the fascist within yourself and the mechanisms behind it. 

That's what I'm afraid of

Nice to you see you btw.  Get back in there you bastard.  If i don't see you interjecting I see a real problem with this forum as a whole. 

Edited 23 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Javfly33]

16 minutes ago, Butters said:

But I was hoping if I keep raising my vibration that I'll be able to pretty much construct my reality consciously, by focusing my loving attention on the things I want and not on anything I don't want. 

Edit: then why am I talking about this... well who knows. I get curious about these things. 

Is not about modifying external Reality is about internally modifying yourself the way you want. 

Look how happy those Peruvian miners are they are chewing that coca leaf they haven´t eaten for 10 hours but internally the chemistry is in a certain way you can be in Heaven in the most shitty external places.

Or you can be inside hell even if the external situations are just fine. Which is basically the whole first world. Everyone talking about depression or anxiety yet everyone has a guaranteed plate of food and shelter.

This is to say experience comes from within. Outside you can arrange some things but fundamentally you have to look within, how you turn this mechanism to work for you not against you. 

Edited 22 hours ago by Javfly33

[tuku747]

[tuku747]

It's pretty incredible how people turn all of politics into identity politics.

Edited 20 hours ago by tuku747

[Thought Art]

37 minutes ago, Butters said:

Rhonda Byrne, Bob Proctor, Esther Hicks, these are similar teachings to what I am talking about. Are you saying they're wrong? 

There is a kernal of truth in them, but focus on your sphere of control. You won't magically change politics.

[BlueOak]

Your self could want for eternity and never get that want. It just tends to be in these more loving states that you describe that people have accepted who they are, aligned with life, got out of their own way, healed themselves, and improved their lives in many ways that things happen for them. They are also happier with simpler things often, so they are happy to start with. It doesn't necessarily mean it's easy even then to achieve something great.




 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

To answer:

Yes, you create your reality.

But we are all connected, all one.

So Trump is (as an example) a product of your reality, A product of Leo's reality. All of our realities.

This is because, we are a collective consciousness. Trump is a product of the collective consciousness of humanity.

Understand?

To further this example: Hitler.

We collectively manifested such an individual. He could not have arisen if the people didn't want him in power, didn't vote for him.

Hitler was also a product of our collective consciousness.  

This goes to show you, how lowly the state of humanity is.

There is a reason things are as they are

All one

[integral]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

@Butters Would be wise of you to remember that David Hawkins was a Ben Shapiro fan.

What is the insight here? How do relatively intelligent people consistently have terrible politics?

Based on the videos you made on Jordan Peterson and the things you said on Elon there seems to be a wide range of reasons.

But I'm trying to find if there's one specific General pattern that causes this?

[Leo Gura]

7 minutes ago, integral said:

What is the insight here? How do relatively intelligent people consistently have terrible politics?

Based on the videos you made on Jordan Peterson and the things you said on Elon there seems to be a wide range of reasons.

But I'm trying to find if there's one specific General pattern that causes this?

The insight is that awakening and spirituality will not give you good politics because politics requires domain-specific contemplative work and research, which spiritual people are not interested in because they are still all operating on group-think. Awakening and mystical experience does not solve the group-think problem nor the epistemology problem.

You can have all the enlightenment and still be a cognitive and political bum. Which is why we devote a chunk of this work to upgrading our political understanding. This is why Actualized is a radically holistic project and not just merely self-inquiry.

Edited 20 hours ago by Leo Gura

[r0ckyreed]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

The insight is that awakening and spirituality will not give you good politics because politics requires domain-specific contemplative work and research, which spiritual people are not interested in because they are still all operating on group-think. Awakening and mystical experience does not solve the group-think problem nor the epistemology problem.

You can have all the enlightenment and still be a cognitive and political bum. Which is why we devote a chunk of this work to upgrading our political understanding. This is why Actualized is a radically holistic project and not just merely self-inquiry.

I dont think any of those people are awake. I dont see how you can reach AWAKENING and engage in groupthink. AWAKENING will radically change how you think about life. Those people, David Hawkins, Eckhart Tolle, Rupert Spira, and others are just engaging in a spiritual circle jerk confusing their beliefs with insights.

[Hojo]

 

5 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

You didn't have to be that gruesome about it.

This also is not an answer to the question. Leo says you should love a man raping a boy because its Gods love and part of reality then turns around and says trump is Satan. No one has any idea what is happening God can do anything. Your outlook on people have an impact on your reality. Reality happens in moments not long strings of story lines. Those are constructed by something else.

Edited 17 hours ago by Hojo

[BlueOak]

This is also a constructed way of thinking. Saying X = Y is a construct. I'll not say what I perceive as bad things so only what I perceive as good things happen is a very rigid construction of your mind. Then I'll not allow others to say 'bad things' is even more rigid. If you want infinite love or the higher parts of your charts as a daily experience, you'd have to love what you currently push away, as exampled here.

Its standard mentoring in this field to push at your constructs, ideologies, beliefs, etc.

Edited 13 hours ago by BlueOak

[BlueOak]

If I were to critique something negatively, with the ideology you have, you would have resistance to hearing it, whereas the next guy might just shrug and say meh whatever, he'd maintain his state and you would get stuck in that downward spiral construct you are speaking about. I do this in a certain way myself, usually by viewing the wider world and seeing things I hate it in, which alters my state into lower ones obviously.

[AION]

People wouldn't be asking these kind of questions if people just read Ken Wilber instead of trying to reinvent the wheel. One of the biggest problem of spiritual people nowadays is that they are trying to reinvent the wheel and feel genius. I'm not above this mental/spiritual masturbation.

Edited 8 hours ago by AION

[Hojo]

@AION Ken Wilbert is a fraud. You can make your own metaphysical wheel whenever you want. Its malleable. You can let Ken Wilbert dictate your spirituality but he dosent exist in mine and his theories are trash. I am new age and I will do what my mind feels right with or without Dilbert.

My metaphysical dick is rock hard.

Edited 1 hour ago by Hojo

[AION]

9 minutes ago, Hojo said:

@AION Ken Wilbert is a fraud. You can make your own metaphysical wheel whenever you want. Its malleable. You can let Ken Wilbert dictate your spirituality but he dosent exist in mine and his theories are trash. I am new age and I will do what my mind feels right with or without Dilbert.

My metaphysical dick is rock hard.

Rock hard arguments right there