I've been noticing some of the apparent contradictions between what Leo said in past videos and what he says now. For example, when he talked about everybody acting with good intentions he later suggested that they are literally good. This also included open-mindedness exercises like the possibility that evil doesn't exist and is a pure fabrication of the mind. Meanwhile he later started talking about insights like I'm not good, I'm evil. He even made posts on this forum about how it is foolish to think everybody is inherently good. This can leave you prone to exploitation. Perhaps this is why stage green is frequently exploited by red by targeting their assumptions of good intent. From one point of view evil does not exist, from one point of view everybody is good, from one point of view evil does exist, from one point of view it is asinine to think everybody is good. The reason Leo stresses so much that actualized shouldn't be held as a belief system or ideology is because what he teaches is true, but from a certain point of view. Depending on the point of view, a lot of contradictory stances could be true. When he speaks, those are relative truths unless he is delusional. I discussed this site with an ai and the ai thinks he is insane and sounds like a narcissist claiming absolute truth. Leo took some tests to claim otherwise. This is why it would be a nightmare if one day Leo was gone and forums like these turned into an actual cult with people furiously debating what Leo said. I think it would be wise of Leo to one day get rid of the forum seeing how the spiritual community could ultimately devolve into dogma. I'm not sure what conclusion to draw from these teachings if various conclusions are true from a certain point of view.