Leo , any upcoming video this Sunday?

[RendHeaven]

17 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Yes, the precise reason why you react to the black pill is that you are in a mirror.

There are three reactions when it comes to the identification of the ego with a concept:

1)Non-incarnation -> non-reaction.

2)Incarnation and identification -> Learned helplessness, possible mirror with the third category (=temptation of narcissistic regression)
Archetype of the victim.

 

3)Incarnation and projection (=denial) -> Manifestation of the black pill (among others, but here it was the example) but refusal of identification by narcissistic rage (because the ego, the ideal of oneself is greater than in people of the second category), therefore projection.
Projection of learned helplessness and its affects -> "Oh, they are whiners, blah blah blah".

Archetype of the hero.

 

It may seem strange but in fact most of the time the "whiners" are more masculine, many of them are really ugly guys, not charismatic who struggle, while the people in the third category are rather randoms, people who are quite attractive and who have been privileged enough (or crazy, if psychosis) to remain in a more narcissistic functioning and therefore project the acquired helplessness ; With an affect of violence.

People who really do not manifest the blackpill do not talk about it because it does not really exist in their maya (category 1).

Nope you simply made that up.

17 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Too much PUFAs 😶

You're about to get lynched by princess arabia and emerald LMAO

*eats popcorn*

[Schizophonia]

2 hours ago, RendHeaven said:

Nope you simply made that up.

No it's the truth.

Quote

You're about to get lynched by princess arabia and emerald LMAO

*eats popcorn*

Ahah.

@Emerald doesn't answer me anymore since i clashed his liberalo anglo-saxono jungian paradigm.

 

Edited December 30, 2024 by Schizophonia

[Emerald]

1 hour ago, Schizophonia said:

 

@Emerald doesn't answer me anymore since i clashed his liberalo anglo-saxono jungian paradigm.

 

I'm not specifically avoiding responding to you. 

[Emerald]

On 12/29/2024 at 9:39 AM, Schizophonia said:

You are attractive and in good metabolic health, so you can identify with the winning side and project these "whiners", but in reality it stresses you out, if that were not the case you would not want to project that, QED.

You can't get your head around the fact that some men are 4/10 and below and get rejected all the time, even with tons of effort, can't get into a relationship, even less a relationship where they have power.

Relative reality :

1)

Women are supposed to be attracted to normally built men, and modern men are degenerate from what we should be, everyone is supposed to be 8 to 10/10 lol, it would just be a matter of being a well, normally developed homo sapiens.

Men have a big libido so forget a little more about their self-esteem, which means that "black pill" is associated with a men's problem, but in absolute terms both men and women the less the partner is physically unattractive (and probably mentally, the two are clearly correlated) the less pleasant it will be.

This is why you will never see a really romantic couple where the partners (especially the man, obviously) are unattractive.The less attractive they are, the more you will feel like they are friends.

2)

We are far too feminine (narcissistic) compared to what we should be in nature. Women are essentially, in the context of an intimate relationship, sexual objects, if not entertainment like a child or a pet that reminds us of our identification with the phallus. 

But because we have been educated to see intimate relationships (or influenced by an Oeudipal failure, due to a mother who is too present and/or a father who is too absent) in a balanced way, then we tend to see women more like men and treating them as such, hence the general cognitive dissonance when knowing how to please a woman. 

I could go on, i think I've basically figured out how it all works but i have to keep quiet because people wouldn't understand me and would think i amcrazy because of their social conditioning since childrenhood. 

 

Absolute reality :

We still tend to like playing the victim and the hero, we are in this kind of frequency.

I don't know what else to say, other than good luck finding a functional relationship with that paradigm. 

[Schizophonia]

6 minutes ago, Emerald said:

I'm not specifically avoiding responding to you. 

I teased.

4 minutes ago, Emerald said:

I don't know what else to say, other than good luck finding a functional relationship with that paradigm. 

I act normally in relationships; You skimmed my comment without trying to understand and you just concluded that i was a sociopathe by reading stiff words that i could have chosen.

I like the simplest, stiffest, the more systemic and tangible models possible and i don't want to have to over-nuance my words for people who react emotionally to make their ego foam.

[Emerald]

1 hour ago, Schizophonia said:

I teased.

I act normally in relationships; You skimmed my comment without trying to understand and you just concluded that i was a sociopathe by reading stiff words that i could have chosen.

I like the simplest, stiffest, the more systemic and tangible models possible and i don't want to have to over-nuance my words for people who react emotionally to make their ego foam.

I skimmed through your message a couple hours ago and read the body of what your wrote as you sharing your perspective on relationships when you'd said I don't respond to your messages because you and the other guy was like "How is Emerald and Princess Arabia going to respond." 

So, I see in looking back you were driving it to a different point at the end. But I'm still not entirely sure that you aren't trying to make some of the points that you've labeled "relative reality." Is it your perspective that those things aren't true? Or is it your perspective that they are relatively true, but that they're not absolutely true?

If it's the latter, you're going to be struggling with having functional interactions and relationships with your female peers.

[Schizophonia]

15 hours ago, Emerald said:

I skimmed through your message a couple hours ago and read the body of what your wrote as you sharing your perspective on relationships when you'd said I don't respond to your messages because you and the other guy was like "How is Emerald and Princess Arabia going to respond." 

So, I see in looking back you were driving it to a different point at the end. But I'm still not entirely sure that you aren't trying to make some of the points that you've labeled "relative reality." Is it your perspective that those things aren't true? Or is it your perspective that they are relatively true, but that they're not absolutely true?

If it's the latter, you're going to be struggling with having functional interactions and relationships with your female peers.

I mean that beyond what seems (relatively) true to me and a number of prominent mirrors of mine, fundamentally we manifest what we manifest, embody, within the framework of the game of hero and victim. It is one of the games of humans.

My point is that by denying the blackpill and behaving in a patronizing manner, we do not demanifest the blackpill, we only play "the hero of the blackpill".
To stop playing the blackpill, we must change frequency and that includes stopping talking about the blackpill
For example, i like @NoSelfSelf , but he is in the "blackpill hero" situation. To leave the game of the blackpill he must apply what he says lol and that includes stopping posting on Actualized, or at least stopping posting on the dating session, 100% garanteed.

I accept that i have few social relationships because that's what I want.

I'm still having some fun here for the holidays and then I'm going to post less for this specific reason.

Read Néville Goddard or Frack Lopvet, Joe Dispenza too even if it's more health oriented.

Edited December 31, 2024 by Schizophonia