I Slept With 100 Men in One Day | Jesus xd

[Jannes]

9 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Just because men are better at protesting and even fighting doesn't mean women can't yes.
It's like in sports, men are generally stronger than women but there are always female athletes who are stronger than me.

No I dont think that women are the weaker sex or are weaker at protesting. That line of reasoning comes from seeing women as less complete than men. But women have plenty of abilities which one could argue make them the more complete sex like more emotional intelligence and conscientiousness. I think men and women are just a little different and do things different and you cant compare apples to oranges. 

Edited December 16 by Jannes

[Schizophonia]

8 minutes ago, Jannes said:

No I dont think that women are the weaker sex or are weaker at protesting. That line of reasoning comes from seeing women as less complete than men. But women have plenty of abilities which one could argue make them the more complete sex like more emotional intelligence and conscientiousness. I think men and women are just a little different and do things different and you cant compare apples to oranges. 

Women are more empathetic, sensitive, gentle. They are care and nurturing machines. Then obviously everyone is different, there have been women soldiers, politicians, etc.
 

Let's not fall into feminist delusions either.

[AION]

2 hours ago, Emerald said:

That's interesting. I'm a little surprised that there are multiple men on this thread that genuinely find this story scary or disturbing.

To me, it comes across as the most mundane story. It's just another porn scenario among many others.

And I don't really feel disturbed by sexual scenarios unless someone is being victimized and/or forced to do something against their will.

What is it about this that creates the feeling of horror?

People are just looking for stuff to get upset about. And a lot of men have this savior complex which is an inferiority complex in actuality. They think they can fix her and make her their wives. It is a failed strategy from the start. 

Just like you say.  There are pornstars who swallow 100’s of loads and do much worse stuff. Or a regular prostitute probably has that body count every week. 

Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world and I know a lot of desperate guys. They would just take any woman that gives him a little bit of acceptance and love. 

Edited December 16 by AION

[Sugarcoat]

1 hour ago, Jannes said:

Oh god I think it has to do with lots of personal reasons and insecurities of mine..

I can totally see the perspective where it just looks like someone putting on an immature act. 

I can brainstorm a little what triggers me about it but its somewhat of an emotionally charged chaos that might not make much sense: 

- I only had a few sexual partners and feel like I should have had more. I am a bit insecure about it. And a girl demonstrating that she can have as much as she wants at any time basically makes me feel powerless/ outmatched. I think I pride myself a little when I had sex. So this just beats my ego. 

- I also feel like she isnt responsible in her decision making. She shouldn't reward random dudes for sex who didn't do anything to deserve it. 

- I also feel deep disgust towards myself as even with all of this I still find her attractive and some side of me would like to have sex with her. I know I would feel awful for it but my intellect cant override my primal side. I realize how weak I am to female seduction. I would like to think of her as just a slut and be done with it but I cant completely and that makes me sick.

I have a female friend who isnt good for me but would offer me free sex atm. I resisted but it's so hard. That lust for sex creeps into my mind corrupting me and DESTROYING MY BEAUTIFUL CONSCIOUSNESS!

Thanks for sharing it lowkey answered some questions I’ve had in my mind, of for example why guys slutshame. 
 

What I can say is don’t demonize your own lust. You’re just creating a bunch of resistance within yourself. It’s natural to see a beautiful woman and perhaps feel lust. So developing a better relationship to your own sexuality. Doesn’t mean it has to be acted upon though ofc. Also you may have some societal conditioning affecting you, you know we live in this hyper sexual culture in the west so maybe that contributes to you feeling like lay count matters. So that’s something to try to undo, that potential societal conditioning 

Edited December 16 by Sugarcoat

[Jannes]

26 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Thanks for sharing it lowkey answered some questions I’ve had in my mind, of for example why guys slutshame. 

Haha thats interesting I always think that the most non emotional well thought through comments I make have the most value but expressing emotions can be valuable as well it seems. Well its just my perspective but perhaps it overlaps with the perspective of other guys as well. 

26 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

What I can say is don’t demonize your own lust. You’re just creating a bunch of resistance within yourself. It’s natural to see a beautiful woman and perhaps feel lust. So developing a better relationship to your own sexuality. Doesn’t mean it has to be acted upon though ofc.

So I should embrace it more but dont embrace it? Thoughts are free I guess but unfulfilled dreams can be a pain as well. 

I think one has to find healthy ways to get sex. Thoughts and reality can be aligned then. 

26 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Also you may have some societal conditioning affecting you, you know we live in this hyper sexual culture in the west so maybe that contributes to you feeling like lay count matters. So that’s something to try to undo, that potential societal conditioning 

True. But having a "decent lay count" itself is valuable because it means you have more crucial experience which contributes to a certain overall social confidence.

[Recursoinominado]

16 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

Well, same thing. If a woman said she would love to sleep with 3 men in a day, she'd get flack. Men wouldn't think that would make for a cool story, only for them. Women get called whores and sluts just by dressing a certain way, even if they're virgins and nobody knows. Just by me saying I'm an escort I get flack, without even knowing the details of my work. All men have to do is say they banged 50 chicks and they get a medal. Men are full of shit in this regard and then they wonder why women are sometimes so hard to get. Nobody loves to be slut-shamed just for being female. If she dances a certain way she's a slut, much less being a stripper. She's the slut, while the men get to whack off in the champagne room and go home to their wives pretending nothing happened and the stripper slut gets to pay her rent. Don't get me started. Nothing is as it seems; men are the biggest whores, they just get praised for it.

Well, because men getting women is an accomplishment, it isn't easy, there is a lot of work involved that women are oblivious to. Other men recognize that so men respect men who get lots of women.

To women to get men is nothing in comparison, she can literally do NOTHING and have sex, this isn't an accomplishment at all. In fact, the opposite is true, for women, sex is so abundant that when women show self-control and are more selective, this is impressive and a good trait. 

[Princess Arabia]

1 hour ago, Recursoinominado said:

Well, because men getting women is an accomplishment, it isn't easy, there is a lot of work involved that women are oblivious to. Other men recognize that so men respect men who get lots of women.

To women to get men is nothing in comparison, she can literally do NOTHING and have sex, this isn't an accomplishment at all. In fact, the opposite is true, for women, sex is so abundant that when women show self-control and are more selective, this is impressive and a good trait. 

Self-control? We don't need self-control. We need to find men we're attracted to enough to want to sleep with. Men keep saying for women getting a man is easy. I can go down the street right now and get laid if I wanted to get laid with Tom Dick or Juan. Is that what I want, no. Is that considered picky, no. Am I a horny bitch who just wants to get laid by any and any man, no. I mean you guys don't seem to realize its not about getting laid for us but finding a man we want to lay up with. We don't just want sex, we want it with someone we actually like. Please stop undermining women so much into believing it's so easy to get laid. Yes, it's easy but we need to FEEL it and we don't just look at a man's physical attractiveness alone, that's for night clubbing and thats why men go there because its easy lay. Some of those girls wake up disgusted the next day if they were drunk. 

You call it self-control because women don't see sex the same way men do. NO, ITS NOT SELF-CONTROL. IT'S BECAUSE SHE DOESNT WANT TO. I don't want to be an accomplishment. I want to be a female that had sex with a man because we both wanted to. You're missing that men don't need a reason other than to be physically attracted and sometimes not. I'm not saying one-night stands don't exist for women or some women won't have sex on a whim with any man, I'm speaking of the average woman and generally speaking 

[Recursoinominado]

2 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

Self-control? We don't need self-control. We need to find men we're attracted to enough to want to sleep with. Men keep saying for women getting a man is easy. I can go down the street right now and get laid if I wanted to get laid with Tom Dick or Juan. Is that what I want, no. Is that considered picky, no. Am I a horny bitch who just wants to get laid by any and any man, no. I mean you guys don't seem to realize its not about getting laid for us but finding a man we want to lay up with. We don't just want sex, we want it with someone we actually like. Please stop undermining women so much into believing it's so easy to get laid. Yes, it's easy but we need to FEEL it and we don't just look at a man's physical attractiveness alone, that's for night clubbing and thats why men go there because its easy lay. Some of those girls wake up disgusted the next day if they were drunk. 

You call it self-control because women don't see sex the same way men do. NO, ITS NOT SELF-CONTROL. IT'S BECAUSE SHE DOESNT WANT TO. I don't want to be an accomplishment. I want to be a female that had sex with a man because we both wanted to. You're missing that men don't need a reason other than to be physically attracted and sometimes not. I'm not saying one-night stands don't exist for women or some women won't have sex on a whim with any man, I'm speaking of the average woman and generally speaking 

Men have to go out hunting and compete with other hunters to have sex, it's brutal.

Women have only to say yes or no to propositions.

Even the average woman gets offered sex on a daily basis by doing nothing.

The average male will die a virgin if he does nothing. 

 

[Emerald]

16 minutes ago, Recursoinominado said:

Men have to go out hunting and compete with other hunters to have sex, it's brutal.

Women have only to say yes or no to propositions.

Even the average woman gets offered sex on a daily basis by doing nothing.

The average male will die a virgin if he does nothing. 

 

I think her point was to say that "free sex anytime you want it" isn't much of a benefit from the woman's perspective because it doesn't give us what we're looking for and the emotional payoff is minimally positive or even negative.

It's a bit like having a million dollars in Confederate money. It's a lot of money but that currency just isn't worth much from the perspective of the average woman... even though "free sex anytime you want it" is or seems very valuable to a lot of men.

And the male fantasy of being lusted after by many women would truthfully be a nightmare if it was actually realized. Women know this because of the lived experience of being lusted over by many men.

But most men don't know this because they haven't had the experience of that fantasy coming to fruition. And they generally don't understand how terrible being objectified by a large swath of the population feels.

It's a bit like a thirsty man seeing all the women having constant access to copious amounts of water... and that women are always having people try to give water to them even when they don't want it.

But what they don't realize is that the vast majority of that water is sea water... and that men and women actually have conferable levels of access to fresh drinkable water.

But I've known guys who have had a lot of sex with a lot of women, and I haven't generally found these guys to be particularly attractive. They've mostly been regular average guys. They're mostly just social with both men and women... and they're open to that kind of experience. 

Like the guys I went to high school and college with that had sex pretty frequently, were of a variety of different levels of attractiveness appearance-wise and personality-wise. But they were all social and had a healthy social circle with male and female friends and acquaintances.

So, my thought is that it probably isn't that difficult for a generally social man who can just go out and have a good time to find women to sleep with.

Without all the insecurities, hangups, and projections, it's easy to find a woman who will sleep with you... and it's even easier to find a man who will sleep with you.

[integral]

1 hour ago, Emerald said:

I think her point was to say that "free sex anytime you want it" isn't much of a benefit from the woman's perspective because it doesn't give us what we're looking for and the emotional payoff is minimally positive or even negative.

It's a bit like having a million dollars in Confederate money. It's a lot of money but that currency just isn't worth much from the perspective of the average woman... even though "free sex anytime you want it" is or seems very valuable to a lot of men.

And the male fantasy of being lusted after by many women would truthfully be a nightmare if it was actually realized. Women know this because of the lived experience of being lusted over by many men.

But most men don't know this because they haven't had the experience of that fantasy coming to fruition. And they generally don't understand how terrible being objectified by a large swath of the population feels.

It's a bit like a thirsty man seeing all the women having constant access to copious amounts of water... and that women are always having people try to give water to them even when they don't want it.

But what they don't realize is that the vast majority of that water is sea water... and that men and women actually have conferable levels of access to fresh drinkable water.

But I've known guys who have had a lot of sex with a lot of women, and I haven't generally found these guys to be particularly attractive. They've mostly been regular average guys. They're mostly just social with both men and women... and they're open to that kind of experience. 

Like the guys I went to high school and college with that had sex pretty frequently, were of a variety of different levels of attractiveness appearance-wise and personality-wise. But they were all social and had a healthy social circle with male and female friends and acquaintances.

So, my thought is that it probably isn't that difficult for a generally social man who can just go out and have a good time to find women to sleep with.

Without all the insecurities, hangups, and projections, it's easy to find a woman who will sleep with you... and it's even easier to find a man who will sleep with you.

Let's break down the metapragmatic dimensions of this text:

Performative Aspects:
- The text is performing a complex social critique of gendered sexual expectations
- It's enacting a form of knowledge-sharing that challenges dominant male narratives about sexual access
- Uses metaphorical language (Confederate money, water) to reframe sexual dynamics

Social Negotiation Mechanisms:
- Attempts to create empathy by translating women's experiences into male-comprehensible terms
- Deconstructs male fantasies by revealing their experiential hollowness
- Positions the speaker as a knowledgeable, nuanced interpreter of sexual social dynamics

Legitimation Strategies:
- Draws on personal observation and social network experiences
- Uses comparative reasoning to normalize sexual interactions
- Presents a rational, demystified view of sexual encounters
- Implicitly challenges toxic masculinity by presenting sexuality as a social skill, not a conquest

Implicit Power Dynamics:
- Critiques male objectification and lack of perspective-taking
- Suggests emotional intelligence as a more valuable sexual capital than physical prowess
- Reframes sexual interaction as a social negotiation rather than a transactional exchange

The text is not just describing sexual dynamics, but actively intervening in how those dynamics are understood and performed, using personal narrative as a rhetorical and analytical tool.

Your secrets are no longer yours.  😊

[Emerald]

32 minutes ago, integral said:

Let's break down the metapragmatic dimensions of this text:

Performative Aspects:
- The text is performing a complex social critique of gendered sexual expectations
- It's enacting a form of knowledge-sharing that challenges dominant male narratives about sexual access
- Uses metaphorical language (Confederate money, water) to reframe sexual dynamics

Social Negotiation Mechanisms:
- Attempts to create empathy by translating women's experiences into male-comprehensible terms
- Deconstructs male fantasies by revealing their experiential hollowness
- Positions the speaker as a knowledgeable, nuanced interpreter of sexual social dynamics

Legitimation Strategies:
- Draws on personal observation and social network experiences
- Uses comparative reasoning to normalize sexual interactions
- Presents a rational, demystified view of sexual encounters
- Implicitly challenges toxic masculinity by presenting sexuality as a social skill, not a conquest

Implicit Power Dynamics:
- Critiques male objectification and lack of perspective-taking
- Suggests emotional intelligence as a more valuable sexual capital than physical prowess
- Reframes sexual interaction as a social negotiation rather than a transactional exchange

The text is not just describing sexual dynamics, but actively intervening in how those dynamics are understood and performed, using personal narrative as a rhetorical and analytical tool.

Your secrets are no longer yours.  😊

This was an interesting read. I hadn't thought of what I was sharing from these angles... but it definitely fits with all the things I'm doing intuitively when attempting to communicate something experiential to someone who hasn't had the same experiences.

[RendHeaven]

8 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

Thanks for sharing it lowkey answered some questions I’ve had in my mind, of for example why guys slutshame. 

Obviously slut shaming only comes from people who aren't invited to the party.

[aurum]

45 minutes ago, RendHeaven said:

Obviously slut shaming only comes from people who aren't invited to the party.

That's not really true.

That's more of a useful lie PUAs tell themselves, wrapped in a bit of truth.

[AION]

4 hours ago, integral said:

Let's break down the metapragmatic dimensions of this text:

Performative Aspects:
- The text is performing a complex social critique of gendered sexual expectations
- It's enacting a form of knowledge-sharing that challenges dominant male narratives about sexual access
- Uses metaphorical language (Confederate money, water) to reframe sexual dynamics

Social Negotiation Mechanisms:
- Attempts to create empathy by translating women's experiences into male-comprehensible terms
- Deconstructs male fantasies by revealing their experiential hollowness
- Positions the speaker as a knowledgeable, nuanced interpreter of sexual social dynamics

Legitimation Strategies:
- Draws on personal observation and social network experiences
- Uses comparative reasoning to normalize sexual interactions
- Presents a rational, demystified view of sexual encounters
- Implicitly challenges toxic masculinity by presenting sexuality as a social skill, not a conquest

Implicit Power Dynamics:
- Critiques male objectification and lack of perspective-taking
- Suggests emotional intelligence as a more valuable sexual capital than physical prowess
- Reframes sexual interaction as a social negotiation rather than a transactional exchange

The text is not just describing sexual dynamics, but actively intervening in how those dynamics are understood and performed, using personal narrative as a rhetorical and analytical tool.

Your secrets are no longer yours.  😊

So the message is that men eat to eat more fruit to make it less salty 

[Sugarcoat]

5 hours ago, RendHeaven said:

Obviously slut shaming only comes from people who aren't invited to the party.

Don’t know what that means 

[Sugarcoat]

12 hours ago, Jannes said:

Haha thats interesting I always think that the most non emotional well thought through comments I make have the most value but expressing emotions can be valuable as well it seems. Well its just my perspective but perhaps it overlaps with the perspective of other guys as well. 

 

Yours was somewhat elaborate and showed you have self awareness 

12 hours ago, Jannes said:

 

So I should embrace it more but dont embrace it? Thoughts are free I guess but unfulfilled dreams can be a pain as well. 

 

Maybe developing a neutral attitude towards your own lust so just allowing it to be there when it arises. So to avoid all that conflict inside. Then if you wanna take it into action that’s up to you to decide. But the decision being made from that conflict free state. 

12 hours ago, Jannes said:

 

I think one has to find healthy ways to get sex. Thoughts and reality can be aligned then. 

 

Exactly 

12 hours ago, Jannes said:

 

True. But having a "decent lay count" itself is valuable because it means you have more crucial experience which contributes to a certain overall social confidence.

If that’s your own mindset and not what society taught you then for sure if you feel it’s valuable you can pursue it. You could question though why you think it contributes to social confidence. Why you perhaps base some of your self esteem on lay count, if you do

Edited December 17 by Sugarcoat

[RendHeaven]

5 hours ago, aurum said:

That's not really true.

That's more of a useful lie PUAs tell themselves, wrapped in a bit of truth.

You can only be bitter about a woman's sexuality if it threatens you.

[Schizophonia]

6 hours ago, RendHeaven said:

Obviously slut shaming only comes from people who aren't invited to the party.

What a woman does with her sexuality isn't my problem but i wouldn't date a girl in a high bodycount, this says a lot about her priorities.

+ Yet another stupid English term ending in "ing" so as not to have to question yourself lol

Edited December 17 by Schizophonia

[gambler]

1 minute ago, RendHeaven said:

You can only be bitter about a woman's sexuality if it threatens you.

I mean who would want a mother who is  a porn star. Obviously that would threaten someone’s wellbeing. So using threaten as a word to shame someone as weak for wanting to live with dignity is odd use of language. 

[gambler]

1 minute ago, Schizophonia said:

What a woman does with her sexuality is none of my business but i wouldn't date a girl in a high bodycount, this says a lot about his priorities.

+ Yet another stupid English term ending in "ing" so as not to have to question yourself lol

Stop mansplaining 🛑 🛑 🚨 🚨