I Slept With 100 Men in One Day | Jesus xd

[eos_nyxia]

11 hours ago, Jannes said:

She is screwing with some foundational agreed upon moral principles which hold society together. Sex is a deep driving force for human behavior so if we dont handle that consciously it can do a lot of damage:

Ok, name a time when there was currency but no paid sex...

Quote

If many girls gave sex away that easily guys would loose morality because they wouldnt need to try that hard to get sex and many girls would be deeply unhappy because they couldnt find somebody to stick around for long.. just my two cents on this, how a society with very free sex would look like would be a very long discussion. 

This has been done before. A number of Polynesian societies were not so precious about sex, nor did they fetishize it. People still coupled up, most often stayed coupled up (to my knowledge), and had kids.

Believe it or not, men still wanted to be around women.

Edited Monday at 06:50 AM by eos_nyxia
Reading history is useful....

[WritingHands]

This makes me wanna beat the shit out of my mom

[Jannes]

1 hour ago, Emerald said:

But it would never actually start a trend because sleeping with a bunch of men isn't interesting to most women. It's very high risk, low reward behavior. And that's especially true if we think about sleeping with a bunch of men in one day.

So, all the danger talk is super hyperbolic. It's just another sexual spectacle to add to the mountain of porn that already exists. And all porn is fundamentally mundane.

Plus, there are already sex workers. And there always have been. So, there has always been relatively easy access to sex on offer for men since the beginning of humanity.

So, she's not really screwing with foundational moral principles that haven't been thoroughly eroded since the days of Moses.

Nicely put. 

Well I just have my perspective where this thing caused some horror in me which I managed to work through like a new variant of a virus the body has to learn how to defend against. 

[Basman]

11 hours ago, integral said:

I wonder if the first person to have sex with her is somehow different from the 100th person to have sex with her on that day. 🤔

Would you seriously walk into that room, seeing the disaster of condoms and bodily fluids everywhere, as the 100th person? And you're going to have sex with her?

Whether you're a man or a woman, you shouldn't be walking into a room full of bodily fluids and expect anything good to come out of it.

When the cameraman walked in the room at the end he almost vomited, you could see it towards the end of the video... The smell was terrible.

---
 ant < dog < trump  < monkey < human? or are we all just different? 

Some people like a bit of trouble.

[Jannes]

5 hours ago, eos_nyxia said:

Ok, name a time when there was currency but no paid sex...

This has been done before. A number of Polynesian societies were not so precious about sex, nor did they fetishize it. People still coupled up, most often stayed coupled up (to my knowledge), and had kids.

Believe it or not, men still wanted to be around women.

Interesting I didnt know that. But girls sleeping with 100 guys would never be an integral part of any culture. 

It's not shocking that a girls sleeps around, but that a girl would put herself through something like this is. 

[Schizophonia]

14 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

I’m guessing our jokes don’t derail the thread because it’s literally about a woman whoring herself out

Dw

14 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

Lol okay I did think for a second if it was a joke

It's still Vava. 🤔

 

[Basman]

5 hours ago, eos_nyxia said:

Believe it or not, men still wanted to be around women.

Yeah, the implication of the previous guy is crazy. As if society would fall apart if men had more access to cheap sex.

[Schizophonia]

12 hours ago, Emerald said:

Your profile says you're from France. Do parents still make decisions for their adult children in France?

Technically no, but they can still pressure me hardly for dangerous, autodestructiive behaviour.

I'm also a man so they automatically have more confidence into my ability to protect myself compared to if i were a woman. Women's psyche is more adapted to a more authoritarian paradigm.

[Emerald]

5 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

Technically no, but they can still pressure me hardly for dangerous, autodestructiive behaviour.

I'm also a man so they automatically have more confidence into my ability to protect myself compared to if i were a woman. Women's psyche is more adapted to a more authoritarian paradigm.

What I notice is that men are more likely (on average) to clamor for authoritarian governance to tell them what's right and wrong, typically in a very systematic and legalistic way. That's why there are so many men who look up to authoritarian political figures. 

But I don't think this is part of men's nature per se... at least not mostly.

I think men tend to be conditioned by society to tune out from their body, emotions, and instincts. And sensitivity to these internal emotional cues tends to be seen as a threat to a man's Masculinity. So, there is often a numbing to the internal compass in order to come across as more stoic.

And so, in lieu of sensitivity to their internal compass (because of the conditioned lack of emotional sensitivity), there is a dearth of self-sovereignty in a sizable percentage of the male population.

And in that vacuum of self-sovereignty, there is a search for a perfect external authoritarian figure to make decisions for them.

So, an authoritarian strong-man who purports himself as a perfect authority will make men who are disconnected from their emotional compass feel like "Finally, I have found the source of direction and truth."

Women, on the other hand, tend to (on average) be more sensitive to their emotions and thus are somewhat more likely to recognize "The emperor has no clothes".

[Emerald]

5 hours ago, Jannes said:

Nicely put. 

Well I just have my perspective where this thing caused some horror in me which I managed to work through like a new variant of a virus the body has to learn how to defend against. 

That's interesting. I'm a little surprised that there are multiple men on this thread that genuinely find this story scary or disturbing.

To me, it comes across as the most mundane story. It's just another porn scenario among many others.

And I don't really feel disturbed by sexual scenarios unless someone is being victimized and/or forced to do something against their will.

What is it about this that creates the feeling of horror?

[Jehovah increases]

I made love to the whole Universe you don't see me making videos or bragging about it 😂

Back in the imaginary days, it was called orgies now it is gangbangs?

Edited 17 hours ago by Jehovah increases

[PurpleTree]

24 minutes ago, Emerald said:

What I notice is that men are more likely (on average) to clamor for authoritarian governance to tell them what's right and wrong, typically in a very systematic and legalistic way. That's why there are so many men who look up to authoritarian political figures. 

But I don't think this is part of men's nature per se... at least not mostly.

I think men tend to be conditioned by society to tune out from their body, emotions, and instincts. And sensitivity to these internal emotional cues tends to be seen as a threat to a man's Masculinity. So, there is often a numbing to the internal compass in order to come across as more stoic.

And so, in lieu of sensitivity to their internal compass (because of the conditioned lack of emotional sensitivity), there is a dearth of self-sovereignty in a sizable percentage of the male population.

And in that vacuum of self-sovereignty, there is a search for a perfect external authoritarian figure to make decisions for them.

So, an authoritarian strong-man who purports himself as a perfect authority will make men who are disconnected from their emotional compass feel like "Finally, I have found the source of direction and truth."

Women, on the other hand, tend to (on average) be more sensitive to their emotions and thus are somewhat more likely to recognize "The emperor has no clothes".

Isn’t it also mostly men who fight against authority, authoritarian regimes, topple governments and such?

[Schizophonia]

22 minutes ago, Emerald said:

What I notice is that men are more likely (on average) to clamor for authoritarian governance to tell them what's right and wrong, typically in a very systematic and legalistic way. That's why there are so many men who look up to authoritarian political figures. 

 

Because they identify with this figure, men do not vote for Trump (because that's certainly a character like that you were thinking of)  to submit to him but at the opposite because they see him as a means of advancing their own agenda and value system.

It is women who are more likely to vote for idealistic people projects that induce self-sacrifice.

[Schizophonia]

38 minutes ago, Emerald said:

I think men tend to be conditioned by society to tune out from their body, emotions, and instincts. And sensitivity to these internal emotional cues tends to be seen as a threat to a man's Masculinity. So, there is often a numbing to the internal compass in order to come across as more stoic.

And so, in lieu of sensitivity to their internal compass (because of the conditioned lack of emotional sensitivity), there is a dearth of self-sovereignty in a sizable percentage of the male population.

It is a direct action of androgen hormones.

It is not society that pushes men to be more stoic, on the contrary people, both men and women, have never been so feminine and emotional because of the comfort of life, lack of experience, and a messed up education.

Edited Monday at 06:15 PM by Schizophonia

[Schizophonia]

15 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Isn’t it also mostly men who fight against authority, authoritarian regimes, topple governments and such?

Testosterone and exogenous androgenic hormones in general turn people into anarchists.

Edited Monday at 06:16 PM by Schizophonia

[PurpleTree]

6 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Testosterone and exogenous androgenic hormones in general turn people into anarchists.

That makes sense i’m such a rebel and  often clash with authority. Probably i have too much testosterone. That’s why i often drink soy milk to tone it down.

[Jannes]

44 minutes ago, Emerald said:

That's interesting. I'm a little surprised that there are multiple men on this thread that genuinely find this story scary or disturbing.

To me, it comes across as the most mundane story. It's just another porn scenario among many others.

And I don't really feel disturbed by sexual scenarios unless someone is being victimized and/or forced to do something against their will.

What is it about this that creates the feeling of horror?

Oh god I think it has to do with lots of personal reasons and insecurities of mine..

I can totally see the perspective where it just looks like someone putting on an immature act. 

I can brainstorm a little what triggers me about it but its somewhat of an emotionally charged chaos that might not make much sense: 

- I only had a few sexual partners and feel like I should have had more. I am a bit insecure about it. And a girl demonstrating that she can have as much as she wants at any time basically makes me feel powerless/ outmatched. I think I pride myself a little when I had sex. So this just beats my ego. 

- I also feel like she isnt responsible in her decision making. She shouldn't reward random dudes for sex who didn't do anything to deserve it. 

- I also feel deep disgust towards myself as even with all of this I still find her attractive and some side of me would like to have sex with her. I know I would feel awful for it but my intellect cant override my primal side. I realize how weak I am to female seduction. I would like to think of her as just a slut and be done with it but I cant completely and that makes me sick.

I have a female friend who isnt good for me but would offer me free sex atm. I resisted but it's so hard. That lust for sex creeps into my mind corrupting me and DESTROYING MY BEAUTIFUL CONSCIOUSNESS!

[Jannes]

1 hour ago, PurpleTree said:

Isn’t it also mostly men who fight against authority, authoritarian regimes, topple governments and such?

Have you heard of feminism?

[PurpleTree]

5 minutes ago, Jannes said:

Have you heard of feminism?

Yea but just 10 mins ago i drove from one neighbourhood to another with my e-bike. I didn’t stop at 90% of the red lights didn’t wear a helmet. While women stopped at them and wore clunky helmets.

[Jannes]

2 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Yea but just 10 mins ago i drove from one neighbourhood to another with my e-bike. I didn’t stop at 90% of the red lights didn’t wear a helmet. While women stopped at them and wore clunky helmets.

The nature of their rebellion is just a little different. It's more strategic and diplomatic sometimes.