I Slept With 100 Men in One Day | Jesus xd

[Schizophonia]

This woman obviously didn't enjoy it, it's actually ego.
She probably felt helpless in such a way and it traumatized her, and since she can't face the truth she tries to pretend it's normal.
If she reconnected with herself, if she contemplated whether it really gives her pleasure to having did that rather than something else, it would call her whole life into question and trigger fears that are swept under the carpet.
 

Edited Sunday at 05:55 PM by Schizophonia

[Leo Gura]

Its social media algorithms that fuel the creation of this kind of degenerate content.

This girl is fishing for attention.

Edited Sunday at 06:14 PM by Leo Gura

[Sugarcoat]

28 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

This woman obviously didn't enjoy it, it's actually ego.
She probably felt helpless in such a way and it traumatized her, and since she can't face the truth she tries to pretend it's normal.
If she reconnected with herself, if she contemplated whether it really gives her pleasure to having did that rather than something else, it would call her whole life into question and trigger fears that are swept under the carpet.
 

She said in the video she dissociated at times. She can’t be in healthy state mentally to do this. Some commenters considered it self harm even

[Jannes]

20 hours ago, Emerald said:

You're taking this a bit seriously, no?

Why compare a woman having sex with a bunch of guys in one day to a terrorist or mass murderer? And why couch this in such dangerous language?

You write about it like she's some kind of Bloody Mary demon going around murdering unsuspecting men when they say her name three times in the bathroom. 

She is screwing with some foundational agreed upon moral principles which hold society together. Sex is a deep driving force for human behavior so if we dont handle that consciously it can do a lot of damage:

If many girls gave sex away that easily guys would loose morality because they wouldnt need to try that hard to get sex and many girls would be deeply unhappy because they couldnt find somebody to stick around for long.. just my two cents on this, how a society with very free sex would look like would be a very long discussion. 

If she actually started a trend that would be like terrorism from within. 

Edited Sunday at 07:00 PM by Jannes

[PurpleTree]

4 minutes ago, Jannes said:

She is screwing with some foundational agreed upon moral principles which hold society together. Sex is a deep driving force for human behavior so if we dont handle that consciously it can do a lot of damage:

If many girls gave sex away that easily guys would loose morality because they wouldnt need to try that hard to get sex and many girls would be deeply unhappy because they couldnt find somebody to stick around for long.. just my two cents on this, how a society with very free sex would look like would be a very long discussion. 

If she actually started a trend that would be like terrorism from within. 

She didn’t start a trend.

That kind of olympic record banging has been around for decades.

I remember seeing at as a kid on tv.

[Schizophonia]

44 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

She said in the video she dissociated at times. She can’t be in healthy state mentally to do this. Some commenters considered it self harm even

Exposing herself like this is a cry for help, but no one helps her, not even her cuck of a father who acquiesces.
If she were my daughter i would never let her get lost like this,i would like her to be demanding and happy.

Maybe she does enjoy it, but it is indeed mediocre and involves a high degree of dissociation in order to enjoy it vicariously. It is a matter of self-persuasion of dissociation.

[Sugarcoat]

23 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Exposing herself like this is a cry for help, but no one helps her, not even her cuck of a father who acquiesces.
If she were my daughter i would never let her get lost like this,i would like her to be demanding and happy.

Parent can't do much in some cases. 

Quote

24 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Maybe she does enjoy it, but it is indeed mediocre and involves a high degree of dissociation in order to enjoy it vicariously. It is a matter of self-persuasion of dissociation.

 

Maybe the purpose for her isn't to enjoy it, but its like charity sex, gaining attention to her onlyfans 

[Jannes]

32 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

She didn’t start a trend.

That kind of olympic record banging has been around for decades.

I remember seeing at as a kid on tv.

Okay I see. 

Well but you kind of get confronted with this possibility..

That it repeatedly didnt light up is chilling to know.

[Schizophonia]

17 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Parent can't do much in some cases.

I would use any pressure means to prevent my daughter to do a such thing.

For my own reputation, her own, and her psychological well being. 

17 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

but its like charity sex, gaining attention to her onlyfans 

Both.

Edited Sunday at 07:48 PM by Schizophonia

[Sugarcoat]

1 minute ago, Schizophonia said:

I would use any pressure means to prevent my daughter to do a such thing.

For my own reputation, her own, and her psychological well being.

I see

[integral]

12 hours ago, Emerald said:

You thought I was really letting my freak flag fly, huh?  

OMG if that were true I'd have to binge watch your videos a second time, marveling at the genius of feminine intelligence.
"I am witnessing a True woman, THIS is jungian intelligence" - things I would say to myself 😅

[Schizophonia]

34 minutes ago, integral said:

OMG if that were true I'd have to binge watch your videos a second time, marveling at the genius of feminine intelligence.
"I am witnessing a True woman, THIS is jungian intelligence" - things I would say to myself 😅

Bruh.

Jung is too complicated for nothing, if you like the simplest and most tangible models possible Freud is far superior.

[shree]

Freud would’ve called this "projection gymnastics" lol

[Emerald]

1 hour ago, Jannes said:

She is screwing with some foundational agreed upon moral principles which hold society together. Sex is a deep driving force for human behavior so if we dont handle that consciously it can do a lot of damage:

If many girls gave sex away that easily guys would loose morality because they wouldnt need to try that hard to get sex and many girls would be deeply unhappy because they couldnt find somebody to stick around for long.. just my two cents on this, how a society with very free sex would look like would be a very long discussion. 

If she actually started a trend that would be like terrorism from within. 

But it would never actually start a trend because sleeping with a bunch of men isn't interesting to most women. It's very high risk, low reward behavior. And that's especially true if we think about sleeping with a bunch of men in one day.

So, all the danger talk is super hyperbolic. It's just another sexual spectacle to add to the mountain of porn that already exists. And all porn is fundamentally mundane.

Plus, there are already sex workers. And there always have been. So, there has always been relatively easy access to sex on offer for men since the beginning of humanity.

So, she's not really screwing with foundational moral principles that haven't been thoroughly eroded since the days of Moses.

[Emerald]

1 hour ago, integral said:

OMG if that were true I'd have to binge watch your videos a second time, marveling at the genius of feminine intelligence.
"I am witnessing a True woman, THIS is jungian intelligence" - things I would say to myself 😅

I am still curious who you thought it was.

But yes... watch them back through to sense the twinkle of the "element of irreducible rascality" in my eyes.

[Emerald]

47 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Bruh.

Jung is too complicated for nothing, if you like the simplest and most tangible models possible Freud is far superior.

Them's fighting words!

Jung's work is far superior to Freud's.

Freud is just oversimplified and is like "Everything comes back to your relationship with your mother, and your dreams are all about sex."

Conversely, Jung is a brilliant mystic and alchemist in a 19th/20th century scientist's clothing. And he (far and away), understood so much more about the workings of the human psyche than any of his contemporaries.

Here are some finger puppets one of my best friends (who is also a Jungian enthusiast) got me for my birthday a few years back...

[UnbornTao]

Jesus Christ, read 10 books in a day or something  

[Emerald]

2 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

Exposing herself like this is a cry for help, but no one helps her, not even her cuck of a father who acquiesces.
If she were my daughter i would never let her get lost like this,i would like her to be demanding and happy.

Maybe she does enjoy it, but it is indeed mediocre and involves a high degree of dissociation in order to enjoy it vicariously. It is a matter of self-persuasion of dissociation.

She's an adult. So, her dad doesn't have any ability to make decisions for her.

And if you had an adult daughter or son, you also wouldn't be able to make decisions for them. And any attempt would backfire.

I've worked with people who have adult children who have addictions, and one of the worst things you can do is to try to jump in and rescue them from themselves. You have to let your adult kids live their own life, even if you hate their choices.

[Sugarcoat]

She must have been so sore afterwards

ouch

[Schizophonia]

2 minutes ago, Emerald said:

Them's fighting words!

Jung's work is far superior to Freud's.

Freud is just oversimplified and is like "Everything comes back to your relationship with your mother, and your dreams are all about sex."

Conversely, Jung is a brilliant mystic and alchemist in a 19th/20th century scientist's clothing. And he (far and away), understood so much more about the workings of the human psyche than any of his contemporaries.

Here are some finger puppets one of my best friends (who is also a Jungian enthusiast) got me for my birthday a few years back...

But more does not necessarily mean better my dear.

What are the archetypes, the persona in general and the mythological concepts based on in Jung? It is only the symbolism necessary for the representation of issues related to survival; It is the whole concept of phallus (relationship to power, to summarize very roughly) in Freud, then the Oedipus complex is "just" a common biographical event, found in the dreams of most people, which is involved in psychosexual development.
This does not mean that people who did not grow up in a nuclear family will degenerate, psychosexual development is very individual.
Although having its singularities, Lacan has completed Freud's work well.

There is no particular confrontation between Jung and Lacan, it is rather a question of point of view.

Freud (and Lacan) is more holistic, simple, fundamental, and it works very well to explain all forms of neuroses. Jung is more layers of concepts.