AI reconstructs Hitler speech in English

[integral]

 

[Inliytened1]

@integral I would rip his heart out and pull out his throat while he was still breathing

[Lucasxp64]

Well. He's eloquent. But we know that's how they operate, they prey on people's genuine grievances.

We can also see that modern day politicians are still using the perceived threat of a very specific group of people as the main culprit. They got screwed from so many directions... But he wants to direct most of that anger towards the Jews specifically. Super weird, that's the part of history that I'm still dumbfounded by... My point is that shit wasn't just propaganda, they actually carried out a mass genocide. Completely unnecessary, they could have just extradited them somewhere.

It's easy to look at those lunatics and think their hate speech is just some crap they are spitting out, like that kind of hating towards the opposite football team, etc... But they actually meant it. That's the messed up part. Their words must be taken seriously.

Even if they didn't quite mean it fully when they began, they ended up making that nightmare a reality.

Such is divisiveness created through gossip (i.e.: Fake news or simply highly emotionally charged commentary), I believe. I.e. the hate speech against left vs right.

When does it stop being simply name-calling each other like young kids do, turns into systematic hate speech, into oppression, and it ends up with genocide?

Edited December 12 by Lucasxp64

[PurpleTree]

I think hitler is an interesting case.

Because he wasn’t a "strong” man like most other dictators.

Failed artist, into the occult and such.

 

 

[Scholar]

On 10.12.2024 at 7:44 AM, Inliytened1 said:

@integral I would rip his heart out and pull out his throat while he was still breathing

Don't overestimate yourself. If you had been born in those times, you would have supported him or just considered anti-semitism as normal, just like you consider today's atrocities as normal. I don't see you ripping anyones throat out, despite there being far greater atrocities committed today.

[gambler]

11 hours ago, Lucasxp64 said:

Completely unnecessary, they could have just extradited them somewhere.

Did you not listen to the whole video? He wanted to send them off to places that had governments that were defending them against their mistreatment or demonization but they refused to take any Jew in. 

[AION]

He sounds like Owen Cook when he is angry

[caspex]

Pretty charismatic. He's made out to be this demon the likes of which are rarely seen but if you actually study him you'll realize his structure of thinking isn't that much different than many people out there today. I know a guy who'd literally do what Hitler did but with Muslims. Hitler's structure of thinking is way more common than people think.

Similar to how kings were literally deified due to how much people respected them, people like Hitler are literally demonized as if something had possessed him to do things. No, this was done by a human, to humans. It's an interesting study in what the human mind is willing to do given certain abilities.

 

There are 1000s of Hitlers walking down the street at this very moment across the globe. Maybe they don't have the charisma, leadership skills, social intelligence, power, money or opportunity to do what he did, but I bet they would if they could.

[Emerald]

On 12/12/2024 at 4:35 AM, Lucasxp64 said:

When does it stop being simply name-calling each other like young kids do, turns into systematic hate speech, into oppression, and it ends up with genocide?

There are 10 stages to genocide. And name-calling is a key ingredient in the 1st of the 10 stages (classification).

So, if society normalizes name-calling... it's already taken the first step to becoming a genocide.

That's why those who are in support of genocide want to convince the populace that everyone's "too sensitive" and "too PC".

Those with genocidal intent from the jump knows that part of their first matter of business in mobilizing the relatively non-genocidal populace towards the enemy group is to normalize name-calling... and to frame people who are against it as a bunch of PC woke-scolds who can't take a joke.

Edited December 14 by Emerald

[PurpleTree]

2 hours ago, Emerald said:

There are 10 stages to genocide. And name-calling is a key ingredient in the 1st of the 10 stages (classification).

So, if society normalizes name-calling... it's already taken the first step to becoming a genocide.

That's why those who are in support of genocide want to convince the populace that everyone's "too sensitive" and "too PC".

Those with genocidal intent from the jump knows that part of their first matter of business in mobilizing the relatively non-genocidal populace towards the enemy group is to normalize name-calling... and to frame people who are against it as a bunch of PC woke-scolds who can't take a joke.

So the wokes are trying to genocide "old white men" for example since they often name call them?

[Emerald]

1 hour ago, PurpleTree said:

So the wokes are trying to genocide "old white men" for example since they often name call them?

Context matters with genocide. 

Genocides don't happen to the ethnic group with the greatest amount of power in a given region. It's always a minority group and/or a group with lesser military power... usually both.

So, those meanie wokesters (most of whom are white themselves) could be as vicious as they want to be to white men without there being a threat of systematic elimination of white people.

It's not nice, of course to be unkind to anyone. But the most that happens in this context is that the occasional old white man could get his feelings hurt. And in rare cases, one-off cases of violence. 

That's why there's less of a taboo around poking fun of whities like myself. 

With the threat of genocide, it's the contextual difference between striking a match and striking a match near a bunch of barrels of kerosene. 

In their first scenario, maybe one individual gets mildly burned by the match. In the second scenario, the entire world goes up in flames.

[PurpleTree]

7 hours ago, Emerald said:

Context matters with genocide. 

Genocides don't happen to the ethnic group with the greatest amount of power in a given region. It's always a minority group and/or a group with lesser military power... usually both.

So, those meanie wokesters (most of whom are white themselves) could be as vicious as they want to be to white men without there being a threat of systematic elimination of white people.

It's not nice, of course to be unkind to anyone. But the most that happens in this context is that the occasional old white man could get his feelings hurt. And in rare cases, one-off cases of violence. 

That's why there's less of a taboo around poking fun of whities like myself. 

With the threat of genocide, it's the contextual difference between striking a match and striking a match near a bunch of barrels of kerosene. 

In their first scenario, maybe one individual gets mildly burned by the match. In the second scenario, the entire world goes up in flames.

I’m not a history buff but it seemingly did happen to people of power in the French revolution guillotined, China by Mao even sometimes just people with glasses were killed or gulaged because they were seen as too nerdy/smart/uppidy. Similarly in Cambodia with the Khmer rouge. Also in Cuba the power was shifted and many killed. Also in Germany before WW2 Jews were actually holding many positions of upper class that was one of the grievances of Adolf.

[Davino]

@integral Thanks for sharing quite cool

12 hours ago, Emerald said:

Very informative. Thanks

[Fluran]

extremely charismatic, overwhelming speech that gives meaning and purpose of people who struggle in the meaningless world

 then pushing  everyone into hell, including himself

 

that's tragedy of love

 

 

Edited Friday at 02:16 AM by Fluran