Easiest and Fastest Proof of Solipsism

[Will1125]

You are pure awareness.

Only what this pure awareness is aware of, exists.

End.

[Sugarcoat]

So pure awareness (nothing) is separate from everything else? 

[Will1125]

12 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

So pure awareness (nothing) is separate from everything else? 

No

[Sugarcoat]

5 minutes ago, Will1125 said:

No

It sounds like it, because you said “only what pure awareness is aware of, exist” suggesting duality: awareness and what awareness is aware of 

[James123]

3 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

It sounds like it, because you said “only what pure awareness is aware of, exist” suggesting duality: awareness and what awareness is aware of 

You should watch the video.

 

 

[Will1125]

14 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

It sounds like it, because you said “only what pure awareness is aware of, exist” suggesting duality: awareness and what awareness is aware of 

There are no dualities between awareness and what awareness is aware of.

If awareness is not aware of something, it doesn't exist. It only exists when it has an existence, which is now, in direct experience.

Edited Friday at 11:55 AM by Will1125

[Will1125]

For me, Solipsism is just the intellectualisation and the logical consequences of what pure awareness is and direct experience.

[James123]

4 minutes ago, Will1125 said:

For me, Solipsism is just the intellectualisation and the logical consequences of what pure awareness is and direct experience.

Solipsism comes from you, when there is no thought attachment, which is you or creates you, there is no more solipsism or taking a shit. 

[Sugarcoat]

4 hours ago, James123 said:

You should watch the video.

 

 

Watched. Cool

[Sugarcoat]

4 hours ago, Will1125 said:

There are no dualities between awareness and what awareness is aware of.

If awareness is not aware of something, it doesn't exist. It only exists when it has an existence, which is now, in direct experience.

Ok. But saying “awareness is aware of something” sounds dual. It’s fine though maybe I’m being picky 

[Yimpa]

5 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

Ok. But saying “awareness is aware of something” sounds dual. It’s fine though maybe I’m being picky 

Awareness is aware of awareness in every possible duality 

[Sugarcoat]

13 minutes ago, Yimpa said:

Awareness is aware of awareness in every possible duality 

Now you’re just playing with words

[Ishanga]

12 hours ago, Will1125 said:

You are pure awareness.

Only what this pure awareness is aware of, exists.

End.

People disagree with You, this proves that Solipsism is not true...

[Dodo]

13 hours ago, Will1125 said:

You are pure awareness.

Only what this pure awareness is aware of, exists.

End.

Not proof of solipsism, because solipsism says only your mind is sure to exist. Awareness is not mind.

Please, from one mind, to another, don't tell others what they are. This is a deep Self inquiry, not Other inquiry. 

Intelectual discussion is fine, but telling someone they are awareness on intellectual level does nothing. Every one of us needs to do the self inquiry by ourselves, another cant do it for us.

[Dodo]

12 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

It sounds like it, because you said “only what pure awareness is aware of, exist” suggesting duality: awareness and what awareness is aware of 

Its not duality, but its also not solipsism. Its nonduality. Its only duality if you still take awareness for an object, if you are awareness on intellectual level.  

Awareness is merged with all, no separation, no duality. 

A way I like to put it, awareness is nothing but is real, objects are something, but illusory.

Something that is illusory really is nothing, in another aggregate form, if you think about it. Ice is water. 

 

[Sugarcoat]

18 hours ago, Dodo said:

Its not duality, but its also not solipsism. Its nonduality. Its only duality if you still take awareness for an object, if you are awareness on intellectual level.  

Awareness is merged with all, no separation, no duality. 

A way I like to put it, awareness is nothing but is real, objects are something, but illusory.

Something that is illusory really is nothing, in another aggregate form, if you think about it. Ice is water. 

 

Aren’t objects just an appearance?

[Schizophonia]

Synchronicities.

[Dodo]

1 hour ago, Sugarcoat said:

Aren’t objects just an appearance?

Sure, i have not said otherwise, objects of perception

[Sugarcoat]

11 minutes ago, Dodo said:

Sure, i have not said otherwise, objects of perception

You said they were illusion

[Dodo]

10 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

You said they were illusion

That which changed is illusion, that which doesn't change is real. Objects of perception change. In your dream at night you know its all an illusion when you wake up, but I for one have experienced objects of perception as realistic as waking, such as wet water, kissing, touch, etc.

Edited 15 hours ago by Dodo