Trump on the Joe Rogan podcast

[manuel bon]

24 minutes ago, Spiritual Warfare said:

He has a straight back even though he is nearly 80 years old.

In 2 years he's probably gonna be like Biden. Just an old man with dementia who doesn't know what he's saying

[Spiritual Warfare]

6 minutes ago, Buck Edwards said:

I think you forgot January 6th or it doesn’t matter to you. 

It doesn’t matter to me.

[Spiritual Warfare]

4 minutes ago, manuel bon said:

In 2 years he's probably gonna be like Biden. Just an old man with dementia who doesn't know what he's saying

To be like Biden is like finding God’s holy penis.

[What Am I]

21 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Well, that is the case. But what people fail to imagine is how much worse things can get than normie establishment business as usual.

Mainstream Dems are a safe bet. No great loss, no great gains.

The choice is a safe mild bet vs an unhinged lunatic.

Right, I saw your latest blog post, and I can't pretend it's not accurate that electing someone outside of the establishment is a pretty large risk in itself, due to the potential for massive instability and somewhat unpredictable outcomes. That risk compounds when it involves someone like Trump. We could be in for quite a ride.

[Buck Edwards]

@Spiritual Warfare if you read all your arguments on this thread, they barely make any sense at all. But I guess you like it like that. 

[Spiritual Warfare]

Just now, Buck Edwards said:

@Spiritual Warfare if you read all your arguments on this thread, they barely make any sense at all. But I guess you like it like that. 

This is who I am, I am the chosen one.

[Spiritual Warfare]

2 minutes ago, Buck Edwards said:

@Spiritual Warfare if you read all your arguments on this thread, they barely make any sense at all. But I guess you like it like that. 

But I don’t understand why January 6 has anything to do with whether you like Trump or not. Okay, Biden won, but what does that have to do with liking Trump or not? Are you talking about election fraud?

[Buck Edwards]

Just now, Spiritual Warfare said:

But I don’t understand why January 6 has anything to do with whether you like Trump or not. Okay, Biden won, but what does that have to do with liking Trump or not? Are you talking about election fraud?

January 6th was indirectly provoked by Trump. 

[Spiritual Warfare]

1 minute ago, Buck Edwards said:

January 6th was indirectly provoked by Trump. 

He may have done that, but no person is perfect. I can still like his opinions even if he has done something foolish.

[josemar]

1 minute ago, Buck Edwards said:

January 6th was indirectly provoked by Trump. 

Uuu indirectly... Must shrink in fear...

Depends where you get your news from. After the twitter files exposé, I wouldn't be surprised if 3 letter agencies were pivotal in their involvement with Jan 6.

[Buck Edwards]

Just now, Spiritual Warfare said:

He may have done that, but no person is perfect. I can still like his opinions even if he has done something foolish.

You can't describe such a violent act as simply "foolish" and just dismiss it. 

[Buck Edwards]

1 minute ago, Spiritual Warfare said:

He may have done that, but no person is perfect. I can still like his opinions even if he has done something foolish.

Also. Trump was already in power for 4 years. But he didn't accomplish anything at all. He was too lazy with his handling of Covid. Why is Trump such a good candidate to you? He did not resolve border issues. He did not turn good on anything he promised in his campaigns. I'm still puzzled about what Trump administration really accomplished in 4 years in your mind? 

 

[Spiritual Warfare]

2 minutes ago, Buck Edwards said:

You can't describe such a violent act as simply "foolish" and just dismiss it. 

It still doesn’t change his opinions, which can be good for society.

[Buck Edwards]

Just now, Spiritual Warfare said:

It still doesn’t change his opinions, which can be good for society.

Can you enlist at least 4 of his opinions please? Which you preferably like. 

[Nilsi]

Whoa, how did I miss this?

I’m gonna grab some popcorn for this.

[Lyubov]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

Kamala is hollow.

She doesn't offer any vision or original ideas, she's just conforming to whatever mild mainstream Dems happen to be into.

But hollow is better than toxic.

The problem I’ve seen with her is that she has completely failed to market herself to the Joe Rogan crowd. Her strategy to get straight men to vote for her is abismal. I’m seeing trump all over podcasts and stuff I would watch and she is nowhere to be seen. Meanwhile she has “trust women”, this feminist crap on large screens at her rallies and in her crowd I see a huge lack of testosterone. I’m tired of the dem party being so effeminate. She could of went more centrist and really campaigned more with the military. She’s too scared to disrupt far left voices in her party. I don’t like how “soft” the dems are, no offense. If it’s the party of democracy it needs to make room for masculinity. I’m not voting for either. 

Edited October 26 by Lyubov

[What Am I]

2 minutes ago, Lyubov said:

The problem I’ve seen with her is that she has completely failed to market herself to the Joe Rogan crowd. Her strategy to get straight men to vote for her is abismal. I’m seeing trump all over podcasts and stuff I would watch and she is nowhere to be seen. Meanwhile she has “trust women”, this crap and in her crowd I see a huge lack of testosterone. I’m tired of the dem party being so effeminate. She could of went more centrist and really campaigned more with the military. She’s too scared to disrupt far left voices in her party. 

I'm pretty confident she would have been on more podcasts if she was capable, but her campaign likely did the calculus and realized it would ultimately hurt them more than help. She may be a personable individual with the effeminate crowd you're describing, but based on what I've seen in her interviews, I really doubt her facade-like demeanor would work on Rogan or anything similar.

[Davino]

10 minutes ago, Lyubov said:

I’m tired of the dem party being so effeminate. She could of went more centrist and really campaigned more with the military. She’s too scared to disrupt far left voices in her party. I don’t like how “soft” the dems are, no offense. If it’s the party of democracy it needs to make room for masculinity.

I think this is a great point to be made. My reflection is that after so much masculine domination the pendulum in politics is swinging to more femininity, we need to make room for that no doubt, but there is really a lack of balls in the left. Pluralism and allowing everyone its place gives room to relativism and division, a strong leader must unite and guide. Create a strong vision and lead its people to a better world, for that you need to have a lot of masculine power and hopefully feminine empathy.

I believe it is a necessary part of the evolution, although inefficient with such dishonest actors.

[DocWatts]

1 hour ago, Spiritual Warfare said:

It doesn’t matter to me.

Which is a tacit endorsement of political violence, and consistent with fascist sympathizers who downplay and excuse MAGA's violent rhetoric and actions.

This kind if attitude has no place within a democracy.

A consistent trend among MAGA fascists is the same DARVO psychological tactics that abusers use to gaslight their victims: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender.

MAGA's response to Jan 6 follows DARVO manipulation tactics to a tee.

Deny that Trump did anything wrong by sending an arm mob to attack the Capitol.

Attack anyone who tries to hold Trump and his inner circle accountable.

Reverse Victim and Offender by decrying that Trump is the victim of a witch hunt by the January 6th Commission and the Department of Justice, who've been working to holding him legally accountable for his crimes.

Edited October 26 by DocWatts

[josemar]

1 hour ago, Buck Edwards said:

Also. Trump was already in power for 4 years. But he didn't accomplish anything at all. He was too lazy with his handling of Covid. Why is Trump such a good candidate to you? He did not resolve border issues. He did not turn good on anything he promised in his campaigns. I'm still puzzled about what Trump administration really accomplished in 4 years in your mind? 

 

He didn't resolve border issues? At least there were 10-15 million less illegals, many criminals in America then.

Economy was booming, inflation was under control...

1 hour ago, Buck Edwards said:

Can you enlist at least 4 of his opinions please? Which you preferably like. 

1. PRO Free speech / First amendment. By contrast, the dems want to censor whoever they don't like (which they already were doing before Musk bought twitter)

2. Pro bitcoin. If a politician is against inflation-proof store of value and is favoring the bankers that will steal your money slowly through inflation hoping you won't notice, I'm not voting for them.

3. Lower (income) taxes. When is that ever a bad thing? Kamala is floating all kinds of ideas on increasing taxes and taxing unrealized profits. Is she crazy? No, just shallow.

4. Decrease size of and make government more efficient.Why would I vote for a party that wants to increase taxes (to sustain an inefficient too large government)?

5. A more sane approach to the newest gender ideology. Offering sex changes to illegal migrants in prison? Yeah... I don't think this is the highest priority.

All the fear mongering lies spread by the left on Trump's crazy ideas, are not worth mentioning...

- project 2025 - Trump has dissociated himself from it multiple times.

- Federal ban on abortions - will not happen, and Trump has said that multiple times

- Trump is as bad as / worse than Hitler... yeah, alright....