Trump on the Joe Rogan podcast

[Basman]

 

[Ash55]

I though he will host both candidate in one show LOL

[manuel bon]

I thought JR was not his supporter, why would he invite Trump 

[Leo Gura]

His audience loves Trump.

[PurpleTree]

5 minutes ago, manuel bon said:

I thought JR was not his supporter, why would he invite Trump 

Probably Elon, Tulsi, Tucker and those other freaks et convinced/bullied him into it.

It’s not Joes fault he is a holy holy man.

[josemar]

2 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Probably Elon, Tulsi, Tucker and those other freaks et convinced/bullied him into it.

It’s not Joes fault he is a holy holy man.

Always with the most uncharitable takes when it comes to Trump... 

I'm sure Kamala has an open invitation to appear on the podcast, but she's occupied elsewhere...

Preventing people to see what a shallow, hollow human being she is... Thankfully too late now.

[manuel bon]

2 minutes ago, josemar said:

 a shallow, hollow human being she is

Why you think she's like this?

[Davino]

I enjoy Joe Rogan as an MMA commentator and think he’s a good dude overall, but his political views, especially his subtle support for Trump and involvement in the propaganda machine, are disappointing.

It’s striking how often ignorance and immaturity fuel such views. Most Trump supporters aren’t devils, they’re just ordinary people caught up in delusion, living in a fantasy.

Whatever, gonna enjoy my favourite fighter in the UFC today. So got more emotional than usual.

[Raze]

I’m disappointed Joe is doing interviews with Trump and probably Kamala, I admired his stance of refusing to interview Biden and Trump. He’s way too soft an interviewer so as I predicted it will just be a long campaign ad. I wish he had at least brought on a co host to really grill the candidates if he was going to do it.

Edited October 26 by Raze

[josemar]

12 minutes ago, manuel bon said:

Why you think she's like this?

I've watched more hours of interviews with her than I like to admit. 

[manuel bon]

41 minutes ago, josemar said:

I've watched more hours of interviews with her than I like to admit. 

Okay but still I don't understand why you say she's shallow And hollow 

Not judging just asking

[Leo Gura]

Kamala is hollow.

She doesn't offer any vision or original ideas, she's just conforming to whatever mild mainstream Dems happen to be into.

But hollow is better than toxic.

Edited October 26 by Leo Gura

[Spiritual Warfare]

2 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Kamala is hollow.

She doesn't offer any vision or original ideas, she's just conforming to whatever mild mainstream Dems happen to be into.

But hollow is better than toxic.

Toxic is better because we need a little aggression. We can’t keep dealing with softness. We have been doing that for far too long. It’s just the name “toxic” that makes us tremble, but in reality, it’s not so bad to be that way.

[Buck Edwards]

1 minute ago, Spiritual Warfare said:

Toxic is better because we need a little aggression. We can’t keep dealing with softness. We have been doing that for far too long. It’s just the name “toxic” that makes us tremble, but in reality, it’s not so bad to be that way.

What do you find so great about Trump? 

[Spiritual Warfare]

Just now, Buck Edwards said:

What do you find so great about Trump? 

He has a straight back even though he is nearly 80 years old.

[What Am I]

5 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Kamala is hollow.

She doesn't offer any vision or original ideas, she's just conforming to whatever mild mainstream Dems happen to be into.

But hollow is better than toxic.

There's also a real perception growing that the last couple Democratic candidates (Biden and Kamala) are just vessels for the entrenched US bureaucracy's will, without any capacity or even desire to display a vision of their own. I'm sure that's playing a part in their lessening popularity since that's kind of the opposite of the qualities someone would expect in a leader.

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, What Am I said:

just vessels for the entrenched US bureaucracy's will, without any capacity or even desire to display a vision of their own.

Well, that is the case. But what people fail to imagine is how much worse things can get than normie establishment business as usual.

Mainstream Dems are a safe bet. No great loss, no great gains.

The choice is a safe mild bet vs an unhinged lunatic.

Edited October 26 by Leo Gura

[sholomar]

1 hour ago, josemar said:

Always with the most uncharitable takes when it comes to Trump... 

I'm sure Kamala has an open invitation to appear on the podcast, but she's occupied elsewhere...

Preventing people to see what a shallow, hollow human being she is... Thankfully too late now.

Nothing bad is going to happen if and when Trump wins. He likes to bluster and troll but his policies aren't half bad. I truly think he'll end these two wars quickly if he gets elected, plus I personally like the company he keeps (Tulsi, Musk, Vance, Vivek) more than the company the democrats keep. The main issue is the democrats don't really accept much dissent on any of their core issues. If you happen to disagree with them they'll bully you about it. I actually find the republicans to be more inclusive in some ways as a whole, minus the fringe elements. I agree with the sentiments of Tulsi and Musk and won't let a bunch of leftist bullies make me feel bad about my choice.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tulsi-gabbard-announces-leaving-democratic-party/story?id=91326164

However, it's not my job to try to convince people which is why I try not to come here and debate it much. I don't suspect I'll change anyone's mind and they won't change mine. Everyone has to find their own truth. There is no ultimate right or wrong way to run a society or set of policy directives that are one size fits all that will work for every person or culture.

 

Edited October 26 by sholomar

[Husseinisdoingfine]

 

[Buck Edwards]

21 minutes ago, Spiritual Warfare said:

He has a straight back even though he is nearly 80 years old.

I think you forgot January 6th or it doesn’t matter to you.