Does this guy watch Leo?

[Jacob Morres]

I can't tell 

(He has amazing content btw) 

 

 

Edited October 22 by Jacob Morres

[Princess Arabia]

Looks like most stuff Leo talked about in his videos. His channel, btw, does look pretty interesting with interesting topics. Will check it out.

[Keryo Koffa]

Literally lists like top 10 leo videos (especially "structure vs content")

+ anything about self-deception is automatically linked across time and space to Leo, no exceptions

[Xonas Pitfall]

Yes! 

He says it is one of the best channels on YouTube in terms of free value. Who knows, he might be here, lurking too . . . 😊❗(●ˇ∀ˇ●)

[Jacob Morres]

48 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

Looks like most stuff Leo talked about in his videos. His channel, btw, does look pretty interesting with interesting topics. Will check it out.

For sure, it's great stuff. Can't get enough of good ideas lol 

[mmKay]

Yes he does . He's got solid Bizz advice. Follow Dan Koe and Alex Hormozi and you'll be filthy rich in no time

Edited October 29 by mmKay

[UpperMaster]

Who's Dan Joe?

[Realms of Wonder]

Yeah, some of his older videos are direct copies, his newer work is more original.

[Sandroew]

I met a person who actually understands that there is transcendental knowledge - as opposed to scientific method which is about dissecting reality to make distinctions. He also understands the difference  between map and territory.

These people exist and they are out there. 

This particular person also has 3 doctor titles. He is a fucking menace. 

Edited October 29 by Sandroew

[LoseYourvelf]

There 

1 minute ago, Sandroew said:

I met a person who actually understands that there is transcendental knowledge - as opposed to scientific method which is about dissecting reality to make distinctions. He also understands the difference  between map and territory.

These people exist and they are out there. 

This particular person also have 3 doctor titles. He is a fucking menace. 

simply put, is NO difference between map and territory. What your friend has is self spawned, and look he got some on you!

 

 

ew gross it's....................... TTD

Edited October 29 by LoseYourvelf

[Sandroew]

Simply put, whatever buddy. 

[LoseYourvelf]

1 minute ago, Sandroew said:

Simply put, whatever buddy. 

Simply put whatever it is

[Sandroew]

Maybe it's time for you to get some fresh air buddy. 

[Carl-Richard]

He could've said "syntax vs semantics", "algorithm vs computation", "form vs being", but no, he chose "structure vs content" (🤓)

I just realized Sat-Chit-Ananda or the Holy Trinity or Brahman-Shiva-Shakti describes the same thing as Marr's Three Levels (Computation, Algorithm, Implementation), but that is just me being Jordan Peterson and interviewing myself 

Edited October 30 by Carl-Richard

[Nilsi]

11 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

He could've said "syntax vs semantics", "algorithm vs computation", "form vs being", but no, he chose to say "structure vs content" (🤓)

I just realized Sat-Chit-Ananda or the Holy Trinity or Brahman-Shiva-Shakti describes the same thing as Marr's Three Levels (Computation, Algorithm, Implementation), but that is just me being Jordan Peterson interviewing myself 

Or the Cynefin framework (Chaotic, Complicated, Complex).

 

Edited October 30 by Nilsi

[The Renaissance Man]

@Jacob Morres Yes he watches Leo, he doesn't hide it either. He said explicitly he thinks it's the most valuable channel on YouTube. He often mentioned the video "65 principles for living the good life" and recommended watching it once a year.

He has endorsed actualized.org multiple times publicly, both recently and years ago.

Edited October 30 by The Renaissance Man

[Carl-Richard]

10 hours ago, Nilsi said:

Or the Cynefin framework (Chaotic, Complicated, Complex).

 

I don't see the connection 🤔 Some other terms for what I'm talking about would be the "what", the "how" and the "where". The Cynefin framework and systems theory in general is mainly concerned about the hows; "relations" between the whats; syntax, structure. Concepts (whats), e.g. emotions, can be related to each other (how), e.g. in a complicated relationship, and implemented in a concrete physical substrate (where), e.g. in neurons or physiological responses.

 

Edited October 30 by Carl-Richard

[RendHeaven]

Dan Koe directly credits Leo Gura in his published book "The Art of Focus"

[Nilsi]

7 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

I don't see the connection 🤔 Some other terms for what I'm talking about would be the "what", the "how" and the "where". The Cynefin framework and systems theory in general is mainly about hows; "relations" between whats; syntax, structure. Concepts (whats), e.g. emotions, can be related to eachother (how), e.g. in a complicated relationship, and implemented in a concrete physical substrate (where), e.g. in neurons or physiological responses.

 

I understand the Brahman-Shiva-Shakti dynamic as follows:

Brahman (Chaos) represents the nondual and undifferentiated ground of existence, the pure essence beyond distinction.

Shiva (Complicatedness) embodies this ground as perceived through logic and intellect - the realm of the virtual, encompassing ideas and concepts.

Shakti (Complexity) represents this same ground as experienced through the senses - the tangible, natural world of complex phenomena.

Obviously, this is a conceptual stretch, and I wouldn't usually discuss metaphysics in either of these terms.

Edited October 30 by Nilsi

[Nilsi]

9 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

I understand the Brahman-Shiva-Shakti dynamic as follows:

Brahman (Chaos) represents the nondual and undifferentiated ground of existence, the pure essence beyond distinction.

Shiva (Complicatedness) embodies this ground as perceived through logic and intellect - the realm of the virtual, encompassing ideas and concepts.

Shakti (Complexity) represents this same ground as experienced through the senses - the tangible, natural world of complex phenomena.

Obviously, this is a conceptual stretch, and I wouldn't usually discuss metaphysics in either of these terms.

Or in Freudian terms: Unconscious-Thanatos-Eros.

Again, it's a stretch - I get it.