Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Nilsi]

34 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

What you found with Actualized.org is so cutting edge, so advanced, that it's a century ahead of mankind.

My god - if it weren’t for your disgusting rhetoric, I might even agree with you.

[Leo Gura]

24 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

My god - if it weren’t for your disgusting rhetoric, I might even agree with you.

You can play your games. But one day you will appreciate how true what I said was.

[Nilsi]

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

You can play your games. But one day you will appreciate how true what I said was.

I appreciate you - I just find the way you’re advertising yourself off-putting.

The same goes for Nietzsche - and yet I have a quote of his in my signature. So don’t take it the wrong way.

[Leo Gura]

3 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

you’re advertising

It isn't about me. This work is rare, whether it's coming from me or some other teacher.

I am not claiming to be the only one who teaches this stuff. But anyone who teaches this stuff will be rare.

Edited Saturday at 05:53 PM by Leo Gura

[Rishabh R]

@Leo Gura So you mean that even your basic self-help videos that you released in the past are rare ? Even though there are other teachers who teach the basic stuff.

[Davino]

@Rishabh R Well you have to recognise we've come a long way. The further you arrive the rarer it will be.

[Princess Arabia]

Actualized Quotes #157.......that's amazing.❤️

[Nilsi]

3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It isn't about me. This work is rare, whether it's coming from me or some other teacher.

I am not claiming to be the only one who teaches this stuff. But anyone who teaches this stuff will be rare.

I see it a bit differently, though I know we disagree on this.

I don’t see it as many people contributing to one shared cutting-edge, but rather as many people working on their own cutting-edge - often in ways that are completely opposed, yet still genuinely doing advanced philosophical (or however you want to define it) work.

So honestly, I’d give you more credit than you seem to give yourself. What you’re doing is unique - not just another interchangeable iteration of “doing the work,” but something distinct and beautiful in its own right.

[Rishabh R]

@Davino Yeah absolutely . I remember watching Leo since 2016 January.

[Raze]

6 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Almost certainly not. And even if he did, he would be hated, ineffective, and booted.

If the public is so easily mislead, what is stopping people with higher development from manipulating them to gain power and lead them in positive directions?

Owen Cook said he began coaching billionaires and politicians and was shocked at how low consciousness they were. But if higher development also means increased understanding of humans and reality, why don’t higher developed people float to the top.

Edited Saturday at 10:08 PM by Raze

[cistanche_enjoyer]

@Leo Gura when can we expect the course for awakened cognition? Looking forward to it 

[Nilsi]

16 minutes ago, Raze said:

But if higher development also means increased understanding of humans and reality, why don’t higher developed people float to the top.

 

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, Raze said:

If the public is so easily mislead, what is stopping people with higher development from manipulating them to gain power and lead them in positive directions?

Owen Cook said he began coaching billionaires and politicians and was shocked at how low consciousness they were. But if higher development also means increased understanding of humans and reality, why don’t higher developed people float to the top.

That's easy. Because to hold power requires corruption. A pure man of truth and love would never survive. He would be killed or booted.

A pure man would never manipulate to gain power because that is a game for egotistical fools. Notice that the wisest men have no power. They never have.

I got news for Owen: you are also low consciousness and corrupt. Which is why you even have access to billionaires.

Edited Sunday at 12:57 AM by Leo Gura

[Davino]

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

A pure man of truth and love would never survive. He would be killed.

Isn't that a generalisation? 

I'm sure one of a kind could pull it off.

[Nilsi]

Just now, Davino said:

Isn't that a generalisation? 

I'm sure one of a kind could pull it off.

 

[Majed]

@Leo Gura Hey leo, why did you lock my post about Santa Claus, i was editing it and making a strong case for Santa Claus being real, since everything is consciousness and imagination, if i become conscious of Santa Claus then Santa Claus is real. Similar to how you said consciousness can imagine a demon and it is real because it is within consciousness. 

[Leo Gura]

3 minutes ago, Davino said:

Isn't that a generalisation? 

I'm sure one of a kind could pull it off.

The best a sage could do is something like Sadhguru with Isha.

[Nilsi]

10 minutes ago, Davino said:

Isn't that a generalisation? 

I'm sure one of a kind could pull it off.

https://smjegupr.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Jacques-Lacan-Seminar-on-the-Purloined-Letter.pdf

You could also take a look at Lacan’s seminar on The Purloined Letter - it’s a brilliant, albeit challenging, read that reveals the deeper metaphysical structure behind the impotence of power.

[Leo Gura]

@Nilsi It's good that you are thinking independently and studying other complex philosophers.

[Yimpa]

57 minutes ago, Majed said:

@Leo Gura Hey leo, why did you lock my post about Santa Claus, i was editing it and making a strong case for Santa Claus being real, since everything is consciousness and imagination, if i become conscious of Santa Claus then Santa Claus is real. Similar to how you said consciousness can imagine a demon and it is real because it is within consciousness. 

Leo didn't lock it.

SANTA CLAUSE did.

You are leaking his secret identity!!!