Nemra

Fascism: An in-Depth Explanation - Ryan Chapman

6 posts in this topic

And they say that philosophy is just "abstract" nonsense.

His YouTube channel is of high quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, he's excellent.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't have time right now to watch the whole video, so maybe it's a stupid question; but why did he talk about Italian and German fascism but not the Spanish one? Would be interesting to know about that too, Franco had an important role also for many years after the war.

Edited by manuel bon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@manuel bon

Mussolini and Hitler were more about tearing things down and building something new

Franco was more focused on keeping traditional values like the Church and the monarchy intact.

Another reason Franco gets less attention is that Spain stayed out of World War II.

Mussolini and Hitler were right in the middle of it, and their drive to conquer new territories was a big part of their fascist identity.

Another big difference is that Franco wasn’t as obsessed with pushing a strict ideology. He used the fascist "Falange" early on but as time passed he distanced himself from its more radical ideas.

Franco kept Spain neutral and just concentrated on staying in control at home. His regime lasted long after the war, but it shifted more toward a conservative dictatorship, not a full blown fascism like Italy or Germany

 

 

Edited by mmKay

This is not a Signature    [TBA]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, mmKay said:

@manuel bon

Mussolini and Hitler were more about tearing things down and building something new

Franco was more focused on keeping traditional values like the Church and the monarchy intact.

Another reason Franco gets less attention is that Spain stayed out of World War II.

Mussolini and Hitler were right in the middle of it, and their drive to conquer new territories was a big part of their fascist identity.

Another big difference is that Franco wasn’t as obsessed with pushing a strict ideology. He used the fascist "Falange" early on but as time passed he distanced himself from its more radical ideas.

Franco kept Spain neutral and just concentrated on staying in control at home. His regime lasted long after the war, but it shifted more toward a conservative dictatorship, not a full blown fascism like Italy or Germany

Yes it's true, but still I don't see why not to talk about it. Maybe Franco was not in the war as Mussolini and Hitler, but he still had a big part in it, even if on paper Spain was more neutral. I mean, a neutral country doesn't have concentration camps, and Spain does. Also, the fact that Spain was not focused not expanding, and not as present in the war as Italy and Germany were, doesn't mean that it was not a fascist country. Fascism stayed long after the war, and as in Italy it has never died. Today we're not at the same level of Franco and Mussolini, but unfortunately we're getting back there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now