Wizardking

What are your thoughts on frequency and vibration?

15 posts in this topic

I was wondering why a big part of the spiritual community talk about frequencies and vibrations whilst another big part does not. I don't think I've ever heard Leo talk about it, neither Eckhart Tolle. Are they using different terms for the same thing or why is it that some talk about it and some don't? What are your thoughts on frequencies and vibrations? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Wizardking said:

I was wondering why a big part of the spiritual community talk about frequencies and vibrations whilst another big part does not. I don't think I've ever heard Leo talk about it, neither Eckhart Tolle. Are they using different terms for the same thing or why is it that some talk about it and some don't? What are your thoughts on frequencies and vibrations? 

Has to do with Sounds and Mantras, research that sort of thing, every Physical thing in existence is vibrating and has a sound frequency. I guess some just don't go in the direction...

 


Karma Means "Life is my Making", I am 100% responsible for my Inner Experience. -Sadhguru..."I don''t want Your Dreams to come True, I want something to come true for You beyond anything You could dream of!!" - Sadhguru

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frequency and vibration are terms often use figuratively. It is a language that I see more natural to those that are more 'kinesiologic-perceiver'. The majority of humans have a perception bias towards Vision, a minority towards hearing, and there are other perception-biases. This type of understanding has been develop in the field of education - so to understand the different ways people learn.

I learned this stuff decades ago and have process a lot of related factors that goes beyond the different types of learning. So I will jump to some of my more digested and conclusive understanding specific to your question.

What I call a 'kinesiologic-perceiver' is someone that is highly tuned-in to his or her 'inner-feelings' that act as an intuitive guiding system from which they navigate in the world. They feel everything, and what they feel is difficult to put into words. The word 'vibration' works for them, because it resemble to how it 'feels' or how they perceive the world. Frequency is just another word for the same thing but that can be used to provide a more detailed expression of a feeling.

I think this type of language is more common among spiritual people because in that community there is probably a much higher percentage of 'kinesiologic-perceiver' than in the general population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

vibration frequency = mood = body shaking. Body shaking creates aura field. Aura is what you are looking through to see reality so it defines how you see it.

Edited by Hojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The more scientifically minded people will use the terms of frequency and vibration and quantum mechanics they are all good and logical terms for scientifically minded people

But in the end it's all the same thing it doesn't contradict spirituality it's just a physical model for better understanding spirituality for scientifically minded people

And it's a very good and valid model for the scientific world we're living in

As Nicholas Tesla firstly said

If you want to understand the secrets of the Universe you gotta think in terms of energy, frequency, vibration

 

Edited by Atb210201

Rationality is Stupidity, Love is Rationality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones who use: "Oh look at these practical aesthetic words to Describe the emotio-sensory fabric of psychic existence!"

The ones who don't use: "Wtf is this woo-woo shit, frequency, chakras, what's next? crystals & gemstones radiating love?!"


    Iridescent       💥        Living Rent-Free in        🥳 Liminal 😁 Psychic 🥰 
❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤      Synergy     Your Fractal 💗 Heart     Hyper-Space !  𓂙 𓃦 𓂀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

44 minutes ago, Keryo Koffa said:

The ones who use: "Oh look at these practical aesthetic words to Describe the emotio-sensory fabric of psychic existence!"

The ones who don't use: "Wtf is this woo-woo shit, frequency, chakras, what's next? crystals & gemstones radiating love?!"

154e5y.jpg

1 hour ago, Atb210201 said:

As Nicholas Tesla firstly said

If you want to understand the secrets of the Universe you gotta think in terms of energy, frequency, vibration

For those paying close attention to the details, it's obvious a fusion needs to occur between our understandings of physics and genuine spiritual phenomena. Scientists like Tesla were clearly aware of this, at least on some level.

Edited by What Am I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ICURBlessings said:

Frequency and vibration are terms often use figuratively. It is a language that I see more natural to those that are more 'kinesiologic-perceiver'. The majority of humans have a perception bias towards Vision, a minority towards hearing, and there are other perception-biases. This type of understanding has been develop in the field of education - so to understand the different ways people learn.

I learned this stuff decades ago and have process a lot of related factors that goes beyond the different types of learning. So I will jump to some of my more digested and conclusive understanding specific to your question.

What I call a 'kinesiologic-perceiver' is someone that is highly tuned-in to his or her 'inner-feelings' that act as an intuitive guiding system from which they navigate in the world. They feel everything, and what they feel is difficult to put into words. The word 'vibration' works for them, because it resemble to how it 'feels' or how they perceive the world. Frequency is just another word for the same thing but that can be used to provide a more detailed expression of a feeling.

I think this type of language is more common among spiritual people because in that community there is probably a much higher percentage of 'kinesiologic-perceiver' than in the general population.

You are a good thinker. Respect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, What Am I said:

154e5y.jpg

For those paying close attention to the details, it's obvious
a fusion needs to occur between our understanding of physics
and genuine spiritual phenomena. Scientists like Tesla
were clearly aware of this, at least on some level.

It all went downhill when Alchemy was phased out and wizards exchanged their dope robes for labcoats 😞

But then we had a psychedelic revolution! 🤩 But then love and peace were made illegal 😞


    Iridescent       💥        Living Rent-Free in        🥳 Liminal 😁 Psychic 🥰 
❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤      Synergy     Your Fractal 💗 Heart     Hyper-Space !  𓂙 𓃦 𓂀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always had the feeling that New Agers just co-opted scientific words to make their ideas sound legitimate and rigorous. You get the same with the word "quantum". 


57% paranoid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone's gangsta until their body dissolves into Light. 


I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think parts of the spiritual world love scientific ideas like: everything is energy, even matter is transformed energy/ energy in a condensed state. This would then somehow confirm Advaita Vedanta/monism etc. And it is a small step then to the New Age creed that 'everything is connected' (everything is just desubstantized flux).
 
Similarly, basic physics ideas that vibrations carry energy and that higher frequencies correspond to higher energy levels can bolster more metaphysical/spiritual ideas. Though it's easy to take those conceps out of context.  

Perhaps the reason that Leo and Tolle don't talk about this is that ultimately spirituality (in their view) is not so much about propositional knowledge as it is about direct experience (of truth).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The most basic duality:    0 and 1     or     yes and no     etc. however you want to call it.
The play of this is what vibration is. Everything is based on this interplay.

Im pretty sure i heard Eckhart Tolle talk about it, but it is not a part of his usual language.

You can find it in the teaching of Leo too, altough he does not speak of it directly if i remember correctly.

Cant bring up examples, because it would make me think about it hours and hours on end. lol

Edit: when I say vibration, I'm talking about waves. Same thing really

Edited by Sandroew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/25/2024 at 3:14 PM, Sincerity said:

You are a good thinker. Respect. 

Thanks for the good "vibe" man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/08/2024 at 6:27 PM, Wizardking said:

I was wondering why a big part of the spiritual community talk about frequencies and vibrations whilst another big part does not. I don't think I've ever heard Leo talk about it, neither Eckhart Tolle. Are they using different terms for the same thing or why is it that some talk about it and some don't? What are your thoughts on frequencies and vibrations? 

It's basically pointing towards what you are putting out into the universe. If you are putting out limited beliefs, then what you will receive are thoughts and ideas which might not be very effective at creating a good life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now