If women ruled the world would it be better?

[enchanted]

Alot of feminists claim that all the world problems are created by men.  If men never existed what would the world look like? 

Would women have taken on all the male roles? Male roles throughout history include construction, engineering, inventing, war, crime, murder.

I think all progress is a form of violence on nature and women are less violent. Therefore in a world where only women exist society would be similar to pre-colonial native American lifestyles focusing more on harmony and community. 

Edited August 25 by enchanted

[Keryo Koffa]

We are nature, we evolve, we violate ourselves, we heal

The masculine expands, the feminine harmonizes

It's a balance issue or in slang: skill issue

But women aren't feminine and men aren't masculine

Those are just psychological gender splits for specialization

Specialization is for insects, we're caught up in redundant cultural artifacts

Edited August 25 by Keryo Koffa

[enchanted]

19 minutes ago, Keryo Koffa said:

We are nature, we evolve, we violate ourselves, we heal

The masculine expands, the feminine harmonizes

It's a balance issue or in slang: skill issue

But women aren't feminine and men aren't masculine

Those are just psychological gender splits for specialization

Specialization is for insects, we're caught up in redundant cultural artifacts

Thanks buddy

[Schizophonia]

Women with higher prenatal testosterone would automatically rise to the top of the pyramid, in fact that is already what is happening.

Look at the head and physical structure of women of power.

[LifeEnjoyer]

6 hours ago, enchanted said:

Alot of feminists claim that all the world problems are created by men.  If men never existed what would the world look like? 

Would women have taken on all the male roles? Male roles throughout history include construction, engineering, inventing, war, crime, murder.

I think all progress is a form of violence on nature and women are less violent. Therefore in a world where only women exist society would be similar to pre-colonial native American lifestyles focusing more on harmony and community. 

In one piece there exists an island only with women. there is no conflict, so idk maybe the one piece author was trying to tell us something lol

[Raze]

I think overall it won’t be much different, most of the people with power in the world don’t behave based on their beliefs but rather behave based on their elite social bubbles / corporate interests who privately control their campaigns / their own personal dynastic power / fear of a popular revolt. Whether the leader is male or female they’ll be run by the same incentives.

I think if there is a difference, all female leadership would worsen domestic policies but improve foreign policies. Womens perspective from what I’ve seen leans more towards emotive compassionate left values, regarding domestic policies this is overall bad because it damages social structures, but regarding foreign policies it is good because they take into account human suffering more and will be less aggressive which is vital for the modern era where military conflict is far deadlier.

[aurum]

6 hours ago, enchanted said:

Alot of feminists claim that all the world problems are created by men.  If men never existed what would the world look like? 

To be fair, most serious feminists do not claim that. Their perspective is more nuanced.

Obviously the modern world could not exist without both men and women contributing in their own ways.

[Keryo Koffa]

6 minutes ago, LifeEnjoyer said:

In one piece there exists an island only with women.
there is no conflict, so idk maybe the one piece author
was trying to tell us something lol

They did kinda try to kill Luffy when he arrived though lol
Wonder Woman also has an Island full of Women, hmm...
There's also a Futurama episode, do I see a pattern?
I bet ChatGPT could mention dozen others

[LifeEnjoyer]

2 hours ago, Keryo Koffa said:

They did kinda try to kill Luffy when he arrived though lol
Wonder Woman also has an Island full of Women, hmm...
There's also a Futurama episode, do I see a pattern?
I bet ChatGPT could mention dozen others

OH YE lmao I forgot about that. I’m only on punk hazard rn, you caught up?

[Basman]

The worlds problems are created as a result of finitude. Saying men cause all the worlds problems is sexist and reductive.

I believe that patriarchal societies tend rise because they are better equipped to deal with inter-species competition where resources are more scarce. The disparity  between chimpanzees and bonobos illustrate this well, both being patriarchal/matriarchal respectively. The bonobos only manage to survive in so far that they are isolated from chimps, who will otherwise easily overrun bonobos. I'd rather be a bonobo but chimps are better at raw survival.

On 25/08/2024 at 1:44 PM, enchanted said:

I think all progress is a form of violence on nature and women are less violent. Therefore in a world where only women exist society would be similar to pre-colonial native American lifestyles focusing more on harmony and community. 

Pre-colonial native American tribes where no hippie communes. They where warlike and even genocidal towards each other. Practicing human sacrifice, scalping, cannibalism and other barbaric acts depending on the tribes culture and environmental pressures. Just look at the Aztecs or the plains tribes like the Comanche. The Black Hills which the Lakota tribe say was stolen from them by colonizers they themselves stole after kicking out the tribes that where there prior. Hippie communes themselves tend to eventually be overrun by drug addicts and criminals, like Christiania in Copenhagen. Don't romanticize tribal cultures.

The underlying assumption here is that it is possible to survive without engaging in any from of violence. It is not and it has never been. People have a twisted sense of what living in harmony with nature means. Living in harmony with nature means you don't have direct control over the resources you need to survive and that you live at the mercy of the elements more or less. It means you have to give your all to meet the bare minimum of survival, where only the most well adapted live, pushing the genetically weak to die. Survival is a brutal and limiting affair. Most animals only live in harmony with nature because they will die if they don't. Then they still die in gruesome ways in natures "web". Most animals die by being eaten alive. Don't romanticize nature.

Humans breaking harmony with nature is them acing survival relatively speaking. And as a result you live in the most prosperous age in human history. Think about what that takes. You zoomers love to complain.

[PurpleTree]

no but it would be cuter and better decorated 

 

 

 

but then I would claim to be a woman and just rule the world

[enchanted]

22 hours ago, aurum said:

To be fair, most serious feminists do not claim that. Their perspective is more nuanced.

Obviously the modern world could not exist without both men and women contributing in their own ways.

Great point