Absurd or not?

[Spiritual Warfare]

I am convinced that there is no limitation at all.  What's the problem here?  We say: there are things we can't even imagine, therefore we are limited.  We say: there are so many possibilities for things, including possibilities we can't even imagine, therefore we are limited.  Hogwash.  Although we certainly can look at things in terms of possibilities, it seems to me like the only things we "can't even imagine" are more than just possibilities, they are fantastical or fantasy-like.  Why would I judge my knowledge and understanding based on fantastical things that are not supported or implied by any real thing or experience I am aware of?  Remember, we're talking about things "I can't even imagine".  So let me get this right, I am limited because there could be realities and worlds that exist so different from what I know that it would destroy my brain etc etc.  I am limited because there could an infinite amount of versions of myself, some doing things I can't even imagine, lol?  Come on.  How about: we can do the exact same things as everything else, since we are all interacting in a shared time and space through the interaction.  We can do exactly what stars are doing and we can do exactly what any molecular cell does.  We all express each other's behaviors, even if we do it by building machines and writing programs.  One way or another I do not see a sever limitation at all.  After all, we can talk to ourselves; we can view our selves in a 3rd-person perspective.  That is a big deal!  We're state-of-the-art baby.  It is impossible for there to be a reality that I can't even imagine in at least a fundamental sense.  Meaning: if it exists, even if I have no idea what it actually is, I still know it must have certain qualities or natures that equal whatever it means for it to exist.  Nothing defies the definition of its own existence because if it did then it would equal having no existence; it would not exist.  If something is said to exist then it will equal whatever it means for it to exist, which includes any fantastical nature or nature we can't even imagine. The idea that we are limited is very popular.  You'll find it used all the time as an escape or clause that allows us to stop thinking about things we can't easily answer.  Once anyone accepts that there are things we will never understand and things we can't even imagine, exactly who is the judge that determines which one is the case for any particular situation?  When is it a case of something you do know or can know and when is it the case where it's something you can't even imagine?  If there are things I can't even imagine, then maybe one of the things I can't even imagine is that nothing is as it seems.

[Spiritual Warfare]

[Keryo Koffa]

 

[Spiritual Warfare]

1 minute ago, Keryo Koffa said:

 

Hmmmm..

[Keryo Koffa]

 As you quoted, "Nothing is impossible, the word itself says "I'm possible" "

Our psyches arouse in synchronicity with our environment's nature and pace

That's why we're tuned into limitation, to interact and perceive nature's order

Without this step, nothing would be significant, limitations create strong vivid emotions, desires, drives

In truth, nothing can limit the infinity of consciousness, except itself for its own purposes as it arises gestalts

Infinity exists irregardless of our ability to perceive it, why? Because why not?!

[ICURBlessings]

2 hours ago, MarioGabrielJ said:

I am convinced that there is no limitation at all.  ...

By this statement do you mean "I am convinced that there is no limitation to imagination - at all"?

[Hojo]

your limited by where you are on the spectrum of infinity. The spectrums of each thing are infinite so yes we can say we experience something along the lines greif but that dosent know we know every experience of grief and going down the spectrum they become totally different experiences. We are unlimited in the sense that we can experience one of everything but not the entire spectrum so we cant know. If someone pinched my balls its an experience, if someone cut my balls off its an experience,on the spectrum both are a pinch but wildly different experiences.

Edited August 23 by Hojo

[Spiritual Warfare]

57 minutes ago, ICURBlessings said:

By this statement do you mean "I am convinced that there is no limitation to imagination - at all"?

Yes

[Spiritual Warfare]

43 minutes ago, Hojo said:

your limited by where you are on the spectrum of infinity. The spectrums of each thing are infinite so yes we can say we experience something along the lines greif but that dosent know we know every experience of grief and going down the spectrum they become totally different experiences. We are unlimited in the sense that we can experience one of everything but not the entire spectrum so we cant know. If someone pinched my balls it’s an experience, if someone cut my balls off it’s an experience,on the spectrum both are a pinch but wildly different experiences.

I enjoyed reading this, you made good points