Can anyone resolve the duality paradox?

[Reciprocality]

Interesting questions from here are the following:

Is the formation of concept from memory a relation of necessity (sufficient reason, necessitated effect) or do we need teleology to bridge the gap? And if there can be found no argument for that necessity pertaining to the phenomena of that formation and the identities involved could a theory on extra-phenomenal substances function as sufficient reason?

And also, if the relation between memories and concepts are one of necessity as well as operating linearly in time then how could that not be a continuum, and if it is a continuum how can something which is dual to discreteness involve discrete or time-less entities such as concepts?

[Atb210201]

On 21/07/2024 at 1:45 AM, enchanted said:

The duality paradox I'm referring to relates to Leo's video on "all dualities must collapse".

We see dualities everywhere: child vs adult, night vs day, dead v alive, outside v inside, stage blue v stage orange. Leo, philosophers, and sociologists correctly point out that there is obviously no exact moment or day a child turns into an adult. Similarily this is true with every other duality.

The paradox is that a rational person can't deny that both children and adults exist but a rational person also can't say when a childhood ends and adulthood begins. 

So if one thing never officially turns into another, how can a rational person even say that thing exist? How do we resolve this paradox? 

There is no paradox everything is one actually