Shots Fired At Trump on Stage, At Rally..

[Joshe]

What about a website that has the receipts of all Trump devilry and you could search the database for “Christian manipulation” or “Violent rhetoric” or “fuck” , lol. Show Christian’s Trump saying the fuck word. They hate that.

Maybe have a “featured” section where the most damning receipts are made prominent. Like that time Steve Bannon was recorded articulating how trump was going to act if he lost. 

Basically, a website with a nice UI, easy to use and one-stop shop for all Trump degeneracy. I think that’d actually be a big hit if it was done right. 

[Rafael Thundercat]

2 minutes ago, Joshe said:

What about a website that has the receipts of all Trump devilry and you could search the database for “Christian manipulation” or “Violent rhetoric” or “fuck” , lol. Show Christian’s Trump saying the fuck word. They hate that.

Maybe have a “featured” section where the most damning receipts are made prominent. Like that time Steve Bannon was recorded articulating how trump was going to act if he lost. 

Basically, a website with a nice UI, easy to use and one-stop shop for all Trump degeneracy. I think that’d actually be a big hit if it was done right. 

Trump Naugthy Trumphets ( TNT) 

 

[Joshe]

1 minute ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Trump Naugthy Trumphets ( TNT) 

😂

[Merkabah Star]

@Rafael Thundercat you quoted raze but have Leo’s name in the quote as if Leo said that. 

Edit to add.. that’s a cheap fake, man. 😂

Edited July 18 by Merkabah Star

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, Joshe said:

What about a website that has the receipts of all Trump devilry and you could search the database for “Christian manipulation” or “Violent rhetoric” or “fuck” , lol. Show Christian’s Trump saying the fuck word. They hate that.

Maybe have a “featured” section where the most damning receipts are made prominent. Like that time Steve Bannon was recorded articulating how trump was going to act if he lost. 

Basically, a website with a nice UI, easy to use and one-stop shop for all Trump degeneracy. I think that’d actually be a big hit if it was done right. 

Tell @FlyingLotus to whip that up for us.

[Davino]

On 17/7/2024 at 5:26 AM, BlessedLion said:

Do you really think Democracy is at stake here? @Leo Gura What solid evidence do you have of this?

Bruh,

You blind?

America has a nuclear bomb in the ass right now and they better get the shit out of the stove real quick 

What solid evidence do you have that Democracy is not at stake with Trump in office?

Edited July 18 by Davino

[Davino]

On 17/7/2024 at 6:09 AM, kguirnela said:

Don't forget he also took a lot of high classified documents & never returned them

True, I had forgot about that. Trump stole some high secrets for his own benefit before leaving office. How many crimes more has Trump need to commit to say enough is enough? Like there are so many red flags that if it were a plane everything would be beeping and flashing with signals:

☢️Danger Catastrophic Failure☠️

But they are just signals true, the American plane hasn't crashed.

Yet

 

Generally speaking, avoid catastrophic and end of the world type of speeches. However, specifically speaking maybe it is the case and fits the situation.

Edited July 18 by Davino

[Danioover9000]

@mrPixel

13 hours ago, mrPixel said:

Stop that. Body language is not a good way of gauging whether or not someone is right.

The point of the video was not the vaccine. She was articulating her point about facts being irrelevant in a disagreement.

Lastly, she was saying that it’s not about winning, not even through persuasion . It’s about coming to a mutual understanding.

   Body language analysis and tonality is a good way to measure how right you are, and how much confidence and conviction you have in believing that. It's also a good way to socialize calibrate, to detect defensiveness, and lying. Take this for example:

   Now apply body language techniques and tell me, is the YT guy lying or genuine with his take? look at the people on the panel too, are they lying or genuine? Give yourself like 5 minutes, then come back and tell me what was your take from how manipulative the panel was, or what your impressions were? That's body language reading for you, and voice reading for you.

   For starters, let me give you my impressions, generally. That clip Piers Morgan played, and how it showed Destiny talking to his live saying that if there's a conservative Destiny fan, who was shielding their wife and daughter and died that he'd make fun of them on Tweeter...and you look at his face, head, hands, how he moved, and listen to his words and his tone. IMHO Destiny is performing in his internet persona, but there's like a 30% chance of genuine belief there, that he'd really make fun of his fan that died protecting their child...this coming from a Father who has a son, who is sociopathic. Do you see how valuable body language reading is if you know the indicators and non-verbal tells to look for?

Edited July 18 by Danioover9000

[Danioover9000]

@Leo Gura

9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Tell @FlyingLotus to whip that up for us.

   Is this evidence of incitement to something?

[Danioover9000]

@Nemra

14 hours ago, Nemra said:

@Danioover9000

It showed that he didn't learn anything from it. When you are under attack, you must follow the orders of your bodyguards to be safe. He was thinking about how to milk that moment to make him seem brave. The shooter, ironically, made him a hero in front of his fans.

   Maybe. But when you're under distress, when life flashes before your eyes, when you are getting attacked, that flight/fight/freeze response kicks in, and when you're under shock you can still do acts or actions that are mostly irrational. Sure that maybe Trump wanted to 'milk the moment' but when I was attacked I wasn't thinking of 'milking the moment', when my hands shot up to guard and defend myself with martial arts techniques. I can bet on average those who fought for survival were not thinking of how they're perceived but were acting on instinct, to preserve their life. And it seems to me you're so biased and hateful to Trump you even deny him those human instincts of preserving his own life, thinking he's very likely 'milking the moment' and still manipulating. Chill down dude.

[mrPixel]

14 hours ago, Nemra said:

He was thinking about how to milk that moment to make him seem brave. The shooter, ironically, made him a hero in front of his fans.

Exactly

[mrPixel]

@Danioover9000 I think you misjudged the body language on this one. Lol

[Danioover9000]

@mrPixel

Just now, mrPixel said:

@Danioover9000 I think you misjudged the body language on this one. Lol

   You didn't even watched that video didn't you?

[mrPixel]

@Danioover9000 Sorry, I was unclear. I was talking about Trump's intentions when he was pumping his fist on stage. He was clearly trying to look tough in front of his fanbase. You seemed to miss that.

[Danioover9000]

@mrPixel

23 minutes ago, mrPixel said:

@Danioover9000 Sorry, I was unclear. I was talking about Trump's intentions when he was pumping his fist on stage. He was clearly trying to look tough in front of his fanbase. You seemed to miss that.

 Oh that moment? What about it?  Like I said, if you were attacked, you'd do irrational things to when the fight/flight/freeze response kicks in. Under stress and under shock anything can happen. Yes Trump pumped his fist but understand he JUST GOT GRAZED BY A BULLET! HE NARROWLY SURVIVED THAT! And anyone who has been through a survival event will know what I'm talking about. I'm just questioning your assumption of him 'milking the moment', like why just that? Why not Trump pumping his fist to show us he's fine? Or why not Trump pump his fist out of instinct for his life? 

[Schizophonia]

I wish anyone would debate me or anyone else about Trump on video rather than spitting on him while hidden behind their computer.

[Danioover9000]

@Schizophonia

2 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

I wish anyone would debate me or anyone else about Trump on video rather than spitting on him while hidden behind their computer.

?

[ryandesreu]

3 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

@mrPixel

 Oh that moment? What about it?  Like I said, if you were attacked, you'd do irrational things to when the fight/flight/freeze response kicks in. Under stress and under shock anything can happen. Yes Trump pumped his fist but understand he JUST GOT GRAZED BY A BULLET! HE NARROWLY SURVIVED THAT! And anyone who has been through a survival event will know what I'm talking about. I'm just questioning your assumption of him 'milking the moment', like why just that? Why not Trump pumping his fist to show us he's fine? Or why not Trump pump his fist out of instinct for his life? 

The U.S. President and their security detail undergo various drills and training exercises to prepare for potential threats, including assassination attempts. The Secret Service, responsible for the president's protection, conducts these exercises to ensure readiness for a wide range of scenarios. These drills can include evacuation procedures, motorcade ambush simulations, and coordinated responses to active shooter situations. The aim is to ensure that both the president and their protective team are well-prepared to handle any emergency.

If these drills are done regularly and properly one's instincts becomes to rely on one's training during an emergency, like an EMT or police officer. The training would be to stay covered in that scenario I would think.

[Hatfort]

2 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

I wish anyone would debate me or anyone else about Trump on video rather than spitting on him while hidden behind their computer.

You or anyone else? Who would be anyone else? Your cousin?

In what setting? You accuse others like you are not hidden behind your computer yourself.

[Joshe]

3 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

I wish anyone would debate me or anyone else about Trump on video rather than spitting on him while hidden behind their computer.

I'm interested in your motives here and rather than spend an hour digging through my intuition and fumbling my way through articulating them, I've used ChatGPT to outline them. 

"Your interpretation adds an interesting layer to the discussion, highlighting a possible strategic motive behind preferring video debates. It suggests a focus on the performative aspects of debate rather than purely on the merit of ideas themselves. Here are a few points that unpack this perspective further:

1. Strategic Advantage: By shifting the debate to a video format, the individual may be looking to exploit the common difficulties associated with spontaneous speech, such as hesitation, repetition, and less precise language. These can be portrayed as weaknesses or inconsistencies in an opponent's argument, even if they might simply reflect the normal challenges of real-time thinking.
2. Dominance in Communication: Some individuals thrive in live interaction settings where they can use charisma, assertiveness, or even aggressive tactics that wouldn’t be as effective in written form. This can overshadow the actual strength of their arguments but create a perception of victory based on delivery and confidence.
3. Pressure and Stress: Live debates, especially on video, introduce elements of performance pressure that can fluster even well-prepared individuals. Someone advocating for this format might believe they can handle this pressure better than their opponents, thereby making the opponents appear less capable or credible.
4. Control Over Narrative: In real-time debates, controlling the narrative can sometimes be easier than in written debates, where each party has more time to consider and craft their responses. Quick thinkers can redirect discussions or evade tough questions more fluidly in live interactions, which can be advantageous if the goal is to undermine the other side’s position rather than to engage deeply with the content.

"

The most charitable interpretation I can give you here is that maybe you believe anti-Trump people such as myself are just dumb ideologues who parrot any talking point we can find to serve our cause. If that's the case and you think you are going to shine a light onto that in real-time, thus reveal there is no substance or merit to any of it, I just don't even know what the fuck to say. 

I'm currently building a model of Trump apologists and you've helped me to identify another cohort. Thank you.

Edited July 18 by Joshe