Juan

AI Cloned Voice Actor’s Voices

8 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

It’s good to see some concrete evidence of AI affecting people’s jobs or LP. What are you guys thoughts on the manner?

Not to call out @integral but what you would said to these people? I know you’ve commented in the past that artists should do more than one thing aside of their LP, what if AI takeover all their other options? 

Edited by Juan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jobs Will not exist in the late future. Short term you can adapt depending on the occupation.


How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Juan we will loose all our jobs because of ai.

It's just some years left of work then it begins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using artists data without their consent is obviously problematic. And to be exact, it is the lack of consent or compensation that is the problem. The future is AI but that doesn't make unfair exploitation OK. It makes it impossible for small business to be able to compete. Currently, AI is enabling the worst tendencies of SD Stage Orange and the technology is  largely being used to further dehumanize society.

Many tech companies bank on the political system being slow to adept, so they "move fast and break things" to establish market dominance before new laws and regulations are put in. The gig economy is perfect example of this as it uses tech to effectively compete in preexisting industries while circumventing regulations and workers rights for maximum profit. It is only recently that just talk of regulation of the gig economy has started.

I'm worried though that because AI is so seemingly complicated it will be very hard to make laws for it. I'm afraid we'll probably get a situation where it is kind of "too late" for new rules to be most effective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Juan

On 2024-06-26 at 7:07 AM, Juan said:

It’s good to see some concrete evidence of AI affecting people’s jobs or LP. What are you guys thoughts on the manner?

Not to call out @integral but what you would said to these people? I know you’ve commented in the past that artists should do more than one thing aside of their LP, what if AI takeover all their other options? 

   One thing I can agree on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@integral

On 2024-06-26 at 10:28 AM, integral said:

Jobs Will not exist in the late future. Short term you can adapt depending on the occupation.

   True, some degree of adaptation is there, but at what cost? And if there are no more jobs in the future, how will you deal with the rise of homelessness and nihilism in the future caused by A.I tech run amok?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Basman

On 2024-06-26 at 10:35 PM, Basman said:

Using artists data without their consent is obviously problematic. And to be exact, it is the lack of consent or compensation that is the problem. The future is AI but that doesn't make unfair exploitation OK. It makes it impossible for small business to be able to compete. Currently, AI is enabling the worst tendencies of SD Stage Orange and the technology is  largely being used to further dehumanize society.

Many tech companies bank on the political system being slow to adept, so they "move fast and break things" to establish market dominance before new laws and regulations are put in. The gig economy is perfect example of this as it uses tech to effectively compete in preexisting industries while circumventing regulations and workers rights for maximum profit. It is only recently that just talk of regulation of the gig economy has started.

I'm worried though that because AI is so seemingly complicated it will be very hard to make laws for it. I'm afraid we'll probably get a situation where it is kind of "too late" for new rules to be most effective.

   True, main problem is excess stage orange and blue run amok, and corporate greed and culture exploiting workers and artists with A.I tech, stealing and ruining their job opportunities. Frankly IMO this is blatant left brain S.T.E.M types wanting to extinct artists and humanities roles and make them irrelevant because they cannot handle how they themselves are apathetic and boring and robotic and cold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

@Basman

   True, main problem is excess stage orange and blue run amok, and corporate greed and culture exploiting workers and artists with A.I tech, stealing and ruining their job opportunities. Frankly IMO this is blatant left brain S.T.E.M types wanting to extinct artists and humanities roles and make them irrelevant because they cannot handle how they themselves are apathetic and boring and robotic and cold.

It is just the nature of the beast I think. Stage Orange reduces survival down to its essential mechanics. Its effective but also dehumanizing. The problem is short-term goals and incentives inherent in Stage Orange culture and not valuing connection, art and humanity intrinsically.

Art commercially often ends up being a means to an end instead of something that wanted to be made. Hence why it doesn't matter to them if an AI made it or not, even if its marginally a worse artist and is exploitative in its design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now