No Other, so you have no experience.

[integral]

It’s 1000% clear That I AM experiencing so the rest of you are not because that would mean something is outside my direct experience. 

This experience is absolute, there can’t be anything outside of it. Why or how can you be experiencing and if you’re not why are you unable to communicate that.

There is no Separate OTHER experiencing at this moment, why can’t we be in agreement that this person writing this message is the only experiencer?

Are you all unaware that I AM occupying all of existence? 

Edited June 4 by integral

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, integral said:

It’s 1000% clear That I AM experiencing so the rest of you are not because that would mean something is outside my direct experience. 

This experience is absolute, there can’t be anything outside of it. Why or how can you be experiencing and if you’re not why are you unable to communicate that.

There is no Separate OTHER experiencing at this moment, why can’t we be in agreement that this person writing this message is the only experiencer?

Are you all unaware that I AM occupying all of existence? 

Its precisely like a dream.  It's the juiciest dream you ever had.  

You ARE GOD.  You are manifesting everything and then hiding it from yourself.

[Inliytened1]

1 hour ago, tuku747 said:

It's the tone. It's the denial. Why deny?

Because it's the highest truth.  No one wants to admit it but if one reaches mystical states of consciousness there is zero denying it after that.

Edited June 5 by Inliytened1

[tuku747]

5 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

Because it's the highest truth.  No one wants to admit it but if one reaches mystical states of consciousness there is zero denying it after that.

I have reached such states of mind.

I realized that I Am All That Is, then I felt and comprehended the horror existential loneliness that I, as God, cope with.

I accepted that I Am All That Is, that All is One, and All is Self.

But at some point, I realized that I was doing extra work by actively denying the reality of other-selves.

It is the energy of the active denial of other that I sought to drop, and opened myself up again to the mystery of the other-self.

So I considered, that both modes are true and in play, and that God is not limited nor bothered by the supposed "paradox" of self and other.

So I chose to deny neither solipsism nor the existence of other. I accept that I Am All That Is, and that You Are Too, and though you are me, you are also a unique facet of me.

The energy of denial, in general, gets old, and is what I am trying to point to.

Total gnosis lacks faith in that which is beyond the known. If you have no faith in that which is beyond yourself, then you are limiting yourself to what you believe yourself to be (the solipsistic bubble God)

In the end, all bubbles (thoughts) must pop.

Solipsism is a big bubble.

Edited June 5 by tuku747

[Inliytened1]

@tuku747 yes.  That is it.  Solipsism doesn't mean that others don't exist. The dream is other.   But also you should not forget that it is still a dream.  That is what makes it more enjoyable.   Because here in this paradigm you realize that death too must be an illusion.  So while you can embrace other you still know that ultimately it is all you this allows you to both experience the fullness and the reality of the dream as reality.  But also knowing that it is a dream and that you are God.

 

Edited June 5 by Inliytened1

[Osaid]

There is no such thing as "no experience." This is an intellectual conclusion, like "non-existence."

Awareness/consciousness is not something had by people.

It is exactly like saying "there are no unicorns in my experience so unicorns have no experience."

Who has no experience? Unicorns? Your conclusion is still imaginary. The entire thing is imaginary. Your mind isn't describing anything.

You can't describe reality through non-existence. Saying something doesn't exist says nothing about what exists. That is pretty much the crux of "solipsism." It's another intellectual form of non-duality.

Edited June 5 by Osaid

[Breakingthewall]

12 hours ago, integral said:

It’s 1000% clear That I AM experiencing so the rest of you are not because that would mean something is outside my direct experience. 

This experience is absolute, there can’t be anything outside of it. Why or how can you be experiencing and if you’re not why are you unable to communicate that.

There is no Separate OTHER experiencing at this moment, why can’t we be in agreement that this person writing this message is the only experiencer?

Are you all unaware that I AM occupying all of existence? 

Let's see, Let's say you're right and you exist and I don't, I'm just a figment of your imagination. You would agree that in the infinite movement of the cosmos, at a given moment it will happen that you will be me and I will be imagining you, right? So, what difference does it make if I am real now or in x time, if time is a relative creation?

If reality is infinite, its manifestations are infinite, so the person you are imagining will at some point exist, and since "some moment" is always now, the conclusion is obvious: there are infinite dimensions of reality superimposed, and you cannot understand it because infinity is not understandable

Edited June 5 by Breakingthewall

[Malekakisioannis]

@integral i am aware that I occupy all of existence. Pr

[Water by the River]

13 hours ago, integral said:

It’s 1000% clear That I AM experiencing so the rest of you are not because that would mean something is outside my direct experience. 

This experience is absolute, there can’t be anything outside of it. Why or how can you be experiencing and if you’re not why are you unable to communicate that.

There is no Separate OTHER experiencing at this moment, why can’t we be in agreement that this person writing this message is the only experiencer?

Are you all unaware that I AM occupying all of existence? 

 

“Solipsism is the idea that you are the only person who exists and everybody else is your dream. Nobody can prove this isn’t so, except I’d like to see a congress of solipsists arguing as to which one of them is really there.” — Alan Watts

Maybe that would be the "Infinity-of-Gods"-conference?

 

 

Edited June 5 by Water by the River

[Inliytened1]

@Water by the River "there's no person its just Being! A collection of senses- but the idea that there is a you is entirely constructed 😀  kind of amazing that God can create the entire universe out of a collection of sensations!" -- the drowning Buddah

[Water by the River]

20 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

@Water by the River "there's no person its just Being! A collection of senses- but the idea that there is a you is entirely constructed 😀  kind of amazing that God can create the entire universe out of a collection of sensations!" -- the drowning Buddah

 

[integral]

10 hours ago, Osaid said:

There is no such thing as "no experience." This is an intellectual conclusion, like "non-existence."

Awareness/consciousness is not something had by people.

It is exactly like saying "there are no unicorns in my experience so unicorns have no experience."

Who has no experience? Unicorns? Your conclusion is still imaginary. The entire thing is imaginary. Your mind isn't describing anything.

You can't describe reality through non-existence. Saying something doesn't exist says nothing about what exists. That is pretty much the crux of "solipsism." It's another intellectual form of non-duality.

Hold on I think this miss represents what I was saying, existence, experience, awareness, consciousness are all absolutes. There is no dualistic counterpart. No one else can have experience because that would imply that my experience is not total and whole. This experience is total and whole and complete there can’t be anything outside of it.

Direct experience is the whole thing. It’s the Shapeshifting object. Dancing and mesmerizing in front of me, it is me changing my body into all kinds of crazy shapes. It’s all one whole complete shape, me! I can’t be anything outside of my shape. Because shape is all there is and shape is what I am. Self absolute, whole and complete, and it’s just right now so of course there can’t be anything outside of it because that’s just more dualistic nonsense ideas I’m thinking about and not part of my direct experience.

So I’m describing reality through existence not nonexistent.

This is the whole thing so there can’t be anything that isn’t this.

Edited June 5 by integral

[integral]

11 hours ago, tuku747 said:

Total gnosis lacks faith in that which is beyond the known. If you have no faith in that which is beyond yourself, then you are limiting yourself to what you believe yourself to be (the solipsistic bubble God)

There can’t be anything unknown there can’t be anything  Beyond  the known because God is all knowing and God is you.

This is it, this is all knowing. The Experience of acquiring something new is a trick. New knowledge is a trick. Unknown is a trick. Unknown is duality. This is the whole thing all the time in every moment.

When you learn something new and you experience that sensation of acquiring something that is just your body changing shape.

It’s like playing with Play-Doh.

How can there be anything beyond the self (unknown) when this is Self! It’s the whole thing it’s the whole self! One shape that is you.

This is all knowing!

Edited June 5 by integral

[integral]

1 hour ago, Malekakisioannis said:

@integral i am aware that I occupy all of existence. Pr

Im gaslighting myself 😂

[Malekakisioannis]

@integral or i am 

[Osaid]

5 hours ago, integral said:

No one else can have experience because that would imply that my experience is not total and whole. This experience is total and whole and complete there can’t be anything outside of it.

Direct experience is the whole thing. It’s the Shapeshifting object. Dancing and mesmerizing in front of me, it is me changing my body into all kinds of crazy shapes. It’s all one whole complete shape, me! I can’t be anything outside of my shape. Because shape is all there is and shape is what I am. Self absolute, whole and complete, and it’s just right now so of course there can’t be anything outside of it because that’s just more dualistic nonsense ideas I’m thinking about and not part of my direct experience.

So I’m describing reality through existence not nonexistent.

This is the whole thing so there can’t be anything that isn’t this.

Ah ok, got it.

Intellect gets tricky with its conclusions, so I wanted to be anal I guess.